IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v69y2012icp17-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability assessment of industrial waste treatment processes: The case of automotive shredder residue

Author

Listed:
  • Vermeulen, Isabel
  • Block, Chantal
  • Van Caneghem, Jo
  • Dewulf, Wim
  • Sikdar, Subhas K.
  • Vandecasteele, Carlo

Abstract

To date numerous environmental, economic and societal indicators have been applied to evaluate and compare the sustainability of products and processes. This study presents a set of ad hoc sustainability indicators suitable for assessing and comparing processes for the treatment of industrial waste streams and for allowing to address efficiently all aspects of sustainability. This set consists of the following indicators: energy intensity, material intensity, water consumption, land use, global warming, human toxicity and treatment cost. The application of these indicators to industrial waste treatment processes is discussed in depth. A distinction is made between direct contributions to sustainability, occurring at the process level itself, and indirect contributions related to the production of auxiliaries and the recovery of end products. The proposed sustainability assessment method is applied to treatment processes for automotive shredder residue (ASR), a complex and heterogeneous waste stream with hazardous characteristics. Although different strategies for recycling and valorization of ASR were developed, with some of them already commercialized, large quantities of ASR are still commonly landfilled. This study concludes that for ASR the most sustainable alternative to the present landfill practice, both in short and long term perspective, consists of recycling combined with energetic valorization of the residual fraction.

Suggested Citation

  • Vermeulen, Isabel & Block, Chantal & Van Caneghem, Jo & Dewulf, Wim & Sikdar, Subhas K. & Vandecasteele, Carlo, 2012. "Sustainability assessment of industrial waste treatment processes: The case of automotive shredder residue," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 17-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:69:y:2012:i:c:p:17-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344912001486
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forton, O.T. & Harder, M.K. & Moles, N.R., 2006. "Value from shredder waste: Ongoing limitations in the UK," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 104-113.
    2. Boughton, Bob, 2007. "Evaluation of shredder residue as cement manufacturing feedstock," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 621-642.
    3. Simic, Vladimir & Dimitrijevic, Branka, 2012. "Production planning for vehicle recycling factories in the EU legislative and global business environments," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 78-88.
    4. Paulo Ferrão & Pedro Nazareth & José Amaral, 2006. "Strategies for Meeting EU End‐of‐Life Vehicle Reuse/Recovery Targets," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 10(4), pages 77-93, October.
    5. Boughton, Bob & Horvath, Arpad, 2006. "Environmental assessment of shredder residue management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 1-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Li & Shiyu Huang & Yanhui Liu & Yiyi Ju, 2021. "Recycling Potential of Plastic Resources from End-of-Life Passenger Vehicles in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Berzi, Lorenzo & Delogu, Massimo & Pierini, Marco & Romoli, Filippo, 2016. "Evaluation of the end-of-life performance of a hybrid scooter with the application of recyclability and recoverability assessment methods," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 140-155.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simic, Vladimir & Dimitrijevic, Branka, 2012. "Production planning for vehicle recycling factories in the EU legislative and global business environments," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 78-88.
    2. Boughton, Bob, 2007. "Evaluation of shredder residue as cement manufacturing feedstock," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 621-642.
    3. Pegoretti, Thaís dos Santos & Mathieux, Fabrice & Evrard, Damien & Brissaud, Daniel & Arruda, José Roberto de França, 2014. "Use of recycled natural fibres in industrial products: A comparative LCA case study on acoustic components in the Brazilian automotive sector," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Berzi, Lorenzo & Delogu, Massimo & Pierini, Marco & Romoli, Filippo, 2016. "Evaluation of the end-of-life performance of a hybrid scooter with the application of recyclability and recoverability assessment methods," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 140-155.
    5. Reddy, Mallampati Srinivasa & Kurose, Keisuke & Okuda, Tetsuji & Nishijima, Wataru & Okada, Mitsumasa, 2008. "Selective recovery of PVC-free polymers from ASR polymers by ozonation and froth flotation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 941-946.
    6. Malcolm Richard, Gent & Mario, Menendez & Javier, Toraño & Susana, Torno, 2011. "Optimization of the recovery of plastics for recycling by density media separation cyclones," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 472-482.
    7. Simic, Vladimir & Dimitrijevic, Branka, 2013. "Risk explicit interval linear programming model for long-term planning of vehicle recycling in the EU legislative context under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 197-210.
    8. Huaixi Song & Quanxi Li & Kailing Liu & Yi Li, 2022. "The Recycling Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering CSR under the Government’s Reward–Penalty Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Coates, Gareth & Rahimifard, Shahin, 2007. "Assessing the economics of pre-fragmentation material recovery within the UK," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 286-302.
    10. T. V. Krishna Mohan & R. K. Amit, 2020. "Dismantlers’ dilemma in end-of-life vehicle recycling markets: a system dynamics model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 591-619, July.
    11. Simic, Vladimir, 2015. "A two-stage interval-stochastic programming model for planning end-of-life vehicles allocation under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 19-29.
    12. Dinler, Esra & Güngör, Zülal, 2017. "Planning decisions for recycling products containing hazardous and explosive substances: A fuzzy multi-objective model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 93-101.
    13. Nakatani, Jun & Konno, Kiyoto & Moriguchi, Yuichi, 2017. "Variability-based optimal design for robust plastic recycling systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 53-60.
    14. Santini, Alessandro & Herrmann, Christoph & Passarini, Fabrizio & Vassura, Ivano & Luger, Tobias & Morselli, Luciano, 2010. "Assessment of Ecodesign potential in reaching new recycling targets," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1128-1134.
    15. Jain, K.P. & Pruyn, J.F.J. & Hopman, J.J., 2016. "Quantitative assessment of material composition of end-of-life ships using onboard documentation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-9.
    16. Simic, Vladimir, 2016. "End-of-life vehicles allocation management under multiple uncertainties: An interval-parameter two-stage stochastic full-infinite programming approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-17.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:69:y:2012:i:c:p:17-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.