IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v46y2006i4p377-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economics and GHG emission reduction of a PLA bio-refinery system—Combining bottom-up analysis with price elasticity effects

Author

Listed:
  • Dornburg, V.
  • Faaij, A.
  • Patel, M.
  • Turkenburg, W.C.

Abstract

This paper analyses energy savings, GHG emission reductions and costs of bio-refinery systems for polylactic acid (PLA) production. The systems comprise ‘multi-functional’ uses of biomass resources, i.e. use of agricultural residues for energy consumption, use of by-products, and recycling and waste-to-energy recovery of materials. We evaluate the performance of these systems per kg of bio-based polymer produced and per ha of biomass production. The evaluation is done using data of Poland assuming that biomass and PLA production is embedded in a European energy and material market. First, the performance of different bio-refinery systems is investigated by means of a bottom-up chain analysis. Second, an analysis is applied that derives market prices of products and land depending on the own-price elasticity of demand. Thus, the costs of bio-refinery systems depending on the demand of land and material are determined. It is found that all PLA bio-refinery systems considered lead to net savings of non-renewable energy consumption of 70–220GJ/(hayr) and net GHG emission reductions of 3–17MgCO2eq/(hayr). Most of these PLA bio-refinery systems lead to net costs for the overall system of up to 4600€/(hayr). PLA production from short rotation wood leads to net benefits of about 1100€/(hayr) if a high amount of a high value product, i.e. fibres, is produced. Multi-functionality is necessary to ensure the viability of PLA bio-refinery systems from biomass with regard to energy savings and GHG emission reduction. However, the multi-functional use of biomass does not contribute much to overall incomes. Multifunctional biomass use – especially the use of biomass residues for energy consumption – contributes significantly to savings of non-renewable energy sources. Own-price elasticity of the demand for materials influences the overall costs of the bio-refinery system strongly. The own-price elasticity of land demand markets could become important if bio-refineries are introduced on a large scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Dornburg, V. & Faaij, A. & Patel, M. & Turkenburg, W.C., 2006. "Economics and GHG emission reduction of a PLA bio-refinery system—Combining bottom-up analysis with price elasticity effects," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 377-409.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:46:y:2006:i:4:p:377-409
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.08.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134490500128X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.08.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annetts, J. E. & Audsley, E., 2003. "Modelling the value of a rural biorefinery--part II: analysis and implications," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 61-76, April.
    2. Pavel Ciaian, 2002. "The impact of the Common Agricultural Policy on income distribution and welfare in Central and Eastern European Countries," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2002_02, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    3. Veronika Dornburg & Iris Lewandowski & Martin Patel, 2003. "Comparing the Land Requirements, Energy Savings, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction of Biobased Polymers and Bioenergy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 7(3‐4), pages 93-116, July.
    4. Audsley, E. & Annetts, J. E., 2003. "Modelling the value of a rural biorefinery--part I: the model description," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 39-59, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kudakasseril Kurian, Jiby & Raveendran Nair, Gopu & Hussain, Abid & Vijaya Raghavan, G.S., 2013. "Feedstocks, logistics and pre-treatment processes for sustainable lignocellulosic biorefineries: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 205-219.
    2. Anja Hansen & Jörn Budde & Annette Prochnow, 2016. "Resource Usage Strategies and Trade-Offs between Cropland Demand, Fossil Fuel Consumption, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions—Building Insulation as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Tao Xiang & Jikun Huang & d’Artis Kancs & Scott Rozelle & Jo Swinnen, 2012. "Food Standards and Welfare: General Equilibrium Effects," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 223-244, June.
    4. Emilia Jankowska & Miranda R. Gorman & Chad J. Frischmann, 2022. "Transforming the Plastic Production System Presents Opportunities to Tackle the Climate Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Sebastian Lubjuhn & Sandra Venghaus, 2024. "Unlocking the potential of the bioeconomy for climate change reduction: The optimal use of lignocellulosic biomass in Germany," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(1), pages 144-159, February.
    6. Hiremath, R.B. & Shikha, S. & Ravindranath, N.H., 2007. "Decentralized energy planning; modeling and application--a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(5), pages 729-752, June.
    7. Broeren, Martijn L.M. & Kuling, Lody & Worrell, Ernst & Shen, Li, 2017. "Environmental impact assessment of six starch plastics focusing on wastewater-derived starch and additives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 246-255.
    8. repec:lic:licosd:26310 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:46:y:2006:i:4:p:377-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.