IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v102y2015icp9-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why doorstepping can increase household waste recycling

Author

Listed:
  • Dai, Y.C.
  • Gordon, M.P.R.
  • Ye, J.Y.
  • Xu, D.Y.
  • Lin, Z.Y.
  • Robinson, N.K.L.
  • Woodard, R.
  • Harder, M.K.

Abstract

In this study we report on a doorstepping intervention which produced a 12.5%, statistically significant, increase in the recycling capture rate. More importantly, we investigate why doorstepping caused the increase, through focus groups, structured interviews and questionnaires. By analyzing the findings with respect to a pragmatic set of eleven clusters of determinants of behaviour change, we find that social norms and emotion were important, with prompts as a more minor determinant. We can now plan further doorstepping knowing an emphasis on these is useful. Knowledge, skills, belief of consequences, belief of capability, action planning, role clarification, feedback, and motivation were determinant clusters found not to be important in this case.

Suggested Citation

  • Dai, Y.C. & Gordon, M.P.R. & Ye, J.Y. & Xu, D.Y. & Lin, Z.Y. & Robinson, N.K.L. & Woodard, R. & Harder, M.K., 2015. "Why doorstepping can increase household waste recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 9-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:102:y:2015:i:c:p:9-19
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915300215
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernstad, A. & la Cour Jansen, J. & Aspegren, A., 2013. "Door-stepping as a strategy for improved food waste recycling behaviour – Evaluation of a full-scale experiment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 94-103.
    2. Harder, M.K. & Woodard, R., 2007. "Systematic studies of shop and leisure voucher incentives for household recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 732-753.
    3. Timlett, R.E. & Williams, I.D., 2008. "Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 622-634.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zi Yin Lin & Xiao Wang & Chang Jun Li & Micheil P. R. Gordon & Marie K. Harder, 2016. "Visual Prompts or Volunteer Models: An Experiment in Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Krushna Chandra Sahoo & Rachna Soni & Madhanraj Kalyanasundaram & Surya Singh & Vivek Parashar & Ashish Pathak & Manju R. Purohit & Yogesh Sabde & Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg & Kristi Sidney Annerstedt &, 2022. "Dynamics of Household Waste Segregation Behaviour in Urban Community in Ujjain, India: A Framework Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Hancong Ma & Mei Li & Xin Tong & Ping Dong, 2023. "Community-Level Household Waste Disposal Behavior Simulation and Visualization under Multiple Incentive Policies—An Agent-Based Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Willman, Kenneth W., 2015. "Information sharing and curbside recycling: A pilot study to evaluate the value of door-to-door distribution of informational literature," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 162-171.
    5. Elena Borasino & Hanna Fuhrmann-Riebel, 2022. "New Kids on the Recycling Block: the Role of Supermarkets and Bodegas for Sustainable Consumer Behaviour in Lima," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 857-881, September.
    6. Caroline M. Y. Law & Ernest K. S. Lee & K. L. Au, 2022. "Hong Kong Citizens’ Socio-Demographic Dynamics of Urban Yard Waste Facilities Siting and Legislation Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Changjun Li & Firooz Firoozmand & Marie K. Harder, 2021. "The Impacts of Shanghai’s July 2019 Municipal Domestic Waste Management Regulations on Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Feiyu Chen & Fang Wang & Jing Hou, 2020. "Individual Preference Framework or Group Preference Framework? Which Will Regulate the Impact Path of Product Facilities on Residents’ Waste-Sorting Behavior Better," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Thanos Ioannou & Katerina Bazigou & Afroditi Katsigianni & Michalis Fotiadis & Christina Chroni & Thrassyvoulos Manios & Ioannis Daliakopoulos & Christos Tsompanidis & Eleni Michalodimitraki & Katia L, 2022. "The “A2UFood Training Kit”: Participatory Workshops to Minimize Food Loss and Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Zhang, Suopeng & Zhang, Mingli & Yu, Xueying & Ren, Hao, 2016. "What keeps Chinese from recycling: Accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 176-186.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fontecha, John E. & Nikolaev, Alexander & Walteros, Jose L. & Zhu, Zhenduo, 2022. "Scientists wanted? A literature review on incentive programs that promote pro-environmental consumer behavior: Energy, waste, and water," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    2. Zhang, Suopeng & Zhang, Mingli & Yu, Xueying & Ren, Hao, 2016. "What keeps Chinese from recycling: Accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 176-186.
    3. Willman, Kenneth W., 2015. "Information sharing and curbside recycling: A pilot study to evaluate the value of door-to-door distribution of informational literature," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 162-171.
    4. Boonrod, K. & Towprayoon, S. & Bonnet, S. & Tripetchkul, S., 2015. "Enhancing organic waste separation at the source behavior: A case study of the application of motivation mechanisms in communities in Thailand," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 77-90.
    5. Hancong Ma & Mei Li & Xin Tong & Ping Dong, 2023. "Community-Level Household Waste Disposal Behavior Simulation and Visualization under Multiple Incentive Policies—An Agent-Based Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Wadehra, Shivani & Nie, Zihan & Alpizar, Francisco, 2024. "Disentangling the chicken or egg causality dilemma of household waste sorting and segregated waste collection: A randomized controlled trial in India," EfD Discussion Paper 24-8, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    7. Muise, Isaac & Adams, Michelle & Côté, Ray & Price, G.W., 2016. "Attitudes to the recovery and recycling of agricultural plastics waste: A case study of Nova Scotia, Canada," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 137-145.
    8. Dhokhikah, Yeny & Trihadiningrum, Yulinah & Sunaryo, Sony, 2015. "Community participation in household solid waste reduction in Surabaya, Indonesia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 153-162.
    9. Wang, Xiaonan & Tzeng, Shian-Yang & Mardani, Abbas, 2022. "Spatial differentiation and driving mechanisms of urban household waste separation behavior in Shanghai, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Shira Daskal & Omar Asi & Isam Sabbah & Ofira Ayalon & Katie Baransi-Karkaby, 2022. "Decentralized Composting Analysis Model—Benefit/Cost Decision-Making Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Sarah Cotterill & Liz Richardson, 2010. "Expanding the Use of Experiments on Civic Behavior: Experiments with Local Government as a Research Partner," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 628(1), pages 148-164, March.
    12. Cole, Christine & Osmani, Mohamed & Quddus, Mohammed & Wheatley, Andrew & Kay, Kath, 2014. "Towards a Zero Waste Strategy for an English Local Authority," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 64-75.
    13. Ansink, Erik & Wijk, Louise & Zuidmeer, Frederiek, 2022. "No clue about bioplastics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Arbués, Fernando & Villanúa, Inmaculada, 2016. "Determinants of behavior toward selective collection of batteries in Spain. A bivariate probit model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-8.
    15. Hasan, Md Mahmudul & Faiz, Tasnim Ibn & Modestino, Alicia Sasser & Young, Gary J. & Noor-E-Alam, Md, 2023. "Optimizing return and secure disposal of prescription opioids to reduce the diversion to secondary users and black market," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    16. Betul Hande Gursoy Haksevenler & Aydin Akpinar & Hiroshan Hettiarachchi, 2023. "The Social Dimensions of an Incentive-Based Urban Recycling Program: A Case-Study from Istanbul, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Nazatul Haron & Shaufique F. Sidique & Alias Radam, 2017. "Examining the Attributes of Electronic Waste Recycling Service: A Choice Modelling Approach," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, August.
    18. Waite, Steve & Cox, Paul & Tudor, Terry, 2015. "Strategies for local authorities to achieve the EU 2020 50% recycling, reuse and composting target: A case study of England," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 18-28.
    19. Bernstad, A. & la Cour Jansen, J. & Aspegren, A., 2013. "Door-stepping as a strategy for improved food waste recycling behaviour – Evaluation of a full-scale experiment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 94-103.
    20. Yihan Zhao & Rong Chen & Mitsuyasu Yabe & Buxin Han & Pingping Liu, 2021. "I Am Better Than Others: Waste Management Policies and Self-Enhancement Bias," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:102:y:2015:i:c:p:9-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.