IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v86y2023ics0038012122002580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing return and secure disposal of prescription opioids to reduce the diversion to secondary users and black market

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan, Md Mahmudul
  • Faiz, Tasnim Ibn
  • Modestino, Alicia Sasser
  • Young, Gary J.
  • Noor-E-Alam, Md

Abstract

Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) has reached an epidemic level in the US. Diversion of unused prescription opioids to secondary users and black market significantly contributes to the abuse and misuse of these highly addictive drugs, leading to the increased risk of OUD and accidental opioid overdose within communities. Hence, it is critical to design effective strategies to reduce the non-medical use of opioids that can occur via diversion at the patient level. In this paper, we aim to address this critical public health problem by designing strategies for the return and safe disposal of unused prescription opioids. We propose a data-driven optimization framework to determine the optimal incentive disbursement plans and locations of easily accessible opioid disposal kiosks to motivate prescription opioid users of diverse profiles in returning their unused opioids. We develop a Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP) model to solve the decision problem, followed by a reformulation scheme using Benders Decomposition that results in a computationally efficient solution. We present a case study to show the benefits and usability of the model using a dataset created from Massachusetts All Payer Claims Data (MA APCD). Our proposed model allows the policymakers to estimate and include a penalty cost considering the economic and healthcare burden associated with prescription opioid diversion. Our numerical experiments demonstrate the model's ability and usefulness in determining optimal locations of opioid disposal kiosks and incentive disbursement plans for maximizing the disposal of unused opioids. The proposed optimization framework offers various trade-off strategies that can help government agencies design pragmatic policies for reducing the diversion of unused prescription opioids.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan, Md Mahmudul & Faiz, Tasnim Ibn & Modestino, Alicia Sasser & Young, Gary J. & Noor-E-Alam, Md, 2023. "Optimizing return and secure disposal of prescription opioids to reduce the diversion to secondary users and black market," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:86:y:2023:i:c:s0038012122002580
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012122002580
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weraikat, Dua & Zanjani, Masoumeh Kazemi & Lehoux, Nadia, 2016. "Two-echelon pharmaceutical reverse supply chain coordination with customers incentives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 41-52.
    2. V. Daniel R. Guide, Jr. & Ruud H. Teunter & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2003. "Matching Demand and Supply to Maximize Profits from Remanufacturing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 303-316, October.
    3. Tsan Sheng Ng & Shuming Wang, 2017. "Recycling systems design using reservation incentive data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1236-1258, October.
    4. Meina Hua & Huajun Tang & Ivan Ka Wai Lai, 2017. "Game Theoretic Analysis of Pricing and Cooperative Advertising in a Reverse Supply Chain for Unwanted Medications in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-31, October.
    5. Aras, Necati & Aksen, Deniz & Gönül Tanugur, Ayse, 2008. "Locating collection centers for incentive-dependent returns under a pick-up policy with capacitated vehicles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 1223-1240, December.
    6. de Figueiredo, João Neiva & Mayerle, Sérgio Fernando, 2008. "Designing minimum-cost recycling collection networks with required throughput," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 731-752, September.
    7. Aksen, Deniz & Aras, Necati & Karaarslan, Ayse Gönül, 2009. "Design and analysis of government subsidized collection systems for incentive-dependent returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 308-327, June.
    8. Stewart, H. & Malinowski, A. & Ochs, L. & Jaramillo, J. & McCall, K., III & Sullivan, M., 2015. "Inside Maine's medicine cabinet: Findings from the Drug Enforcement Administration's medication take-back events," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(1), pages 65-71.
    9. Harder, M.K. & Woodard, R., 2007. "Systematic studies of shop and leisure voucher incentives for household recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 732-753.
    10. Saibal Ray & Tamer Boyaci & Necati Aras, 2005. "Optimal Prices and Trade-in Rebates for Durable, Remanufacturable Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 208-228, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fontecha, John E. & Nikolaev, Alexander & Walteros, Jose L. & Zhu, Zhenduo, 2022. "Scientists wanted? A literature review on incentive programs that promote pro-environmental consumer behavior: Energy, waste, and water," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    2. Aksen, Deniz & Aras, Necati & Karaarslan, Ayse Gönül, 2009. "Design and analysis of government subsidized collection systems for incentive-dependent returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 308-327, June.
    3. Bagheri Hosseini, Mozhde & Dehghanian, Farzad & Salari, Majid, 2019. "Selective capacitated location-routing problem with incentive-dependent returns in designing used products collection network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 655-673.
    4. Sabbaghi, Mostafa & Behdad, Sara & Zhuang, Jun, 2016. "Managing consumer behavior toward on-time return of the waste electrical and electronic equipment: A game theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 545-563.
    5. Tsan Sheng Ng & Shuming Wang, 2017. "Recycling systems design using reservation incentive data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1236-1258, October.
    6. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    7. Das, Debabrata & Dutta, Pankaj, 2022. "Product return management through promotional offers: The role of consumers’ loss aversion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    8. Zhu, Xiaoxi & Wang, Miaomiao & Chen, Guofu & Chen, Xiaoshan, 2016. "The effect of implementing trade-in strategy on duopoly competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 856-868.
    9. Das, Kanchan & Chowdhury, Abdul H., 2012. "Designing a reverse logistics network for optimal collection, recovery and quality-based product-mix planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 209-221.
    10. He, Yuanjie, 2015. "Acquisition pricing and remanufacturing decisions in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 48-60.
    11. Zhang, Yanzi & Berenguer, Gemma & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2024. "A subsidized reverse supply chain in the Chinese electronics industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Wenyuan Wang & Daniel Y. Mo & Yue Wang & Mitchell M. Tseng, 2019. "Assessing the cost structure of component reuse in a product family for remanufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 575-587, February.
    13. Kleber, Rainer & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C. & Zhang, Weihua, 2020. "Two-sided competition with vertical differentiation in both acquisition and sales in remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 572-587.
    14. Xiao, Yongbo, 2017. "Choosing the right exchange-old-for-new programs for durable goods with a rollover," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 512-526.
    15. Pokharel, Shaligram & Mutha, Akshay, 2009. "Perspectives in reverse logistics: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 175-182.
    16. Miao, Zhaowei & Fu, Ke & Xia, Zhiqiang & Wang, Yu, 2017. "Models for closed-loop supply chain with trade-ins," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 308-326.
    17. Erzurumlu, S. Sinan, 2013. "The compatibility of durable goods with contingent generic consumables," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 574-585.
    18. Mohammad Fattahi & Kannan Govindan, 2017. "Integrated forward/reverse logistics network design under uncertainty with pricing for collection of used products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 193-225, June.
    19. Hua, Meina & Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Tang, Huajun, 2019. "Analysis of advertising and a points-exchange incentive in a reverse supply chain for unwanted medications in households based on Game Theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 259-268.
    20. Atalay Atasu & Charles J. Corbett & Ximin (Natalie) Huang & L. Beril Toktay, 2020. "Sustainable Operations Management Through the Perspective of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 146-157, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:86:y:2023:i:c:s0038012122002580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.