IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15775-d1276875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Dimensions of an Incentive-Based Urban Recycling Program: A Case-Study from Istanbul, Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Betul Hande Gursoy Haksevenler

    (Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Faculty of Political Science, Marmara University, Kadıköy, Istanbul 34722, Türkiye)

  • Aydin Akpinar

    (Department of Local Governments, Faculty of Political Science, Marmara University, Kadıköy, Istanbul 34722, Türkiye)

  • Hiroshan Hettiarachchi

    (Independent Researcher, 650 Trailwood Path, Unit D, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301, USA)

Abstract

Incentive-based programs are increasingly becoming common in recycling promotion. These programs are usually designed on the premise that the incentives will nudge the participants’ behavior to be more pro-recycling so that they may continue to support recycling even if there is no reward presented anymore. The technical and economic aspects receive a great deal of attention, while the social elements do not usually receive the same level of attention as above. In this study, a survey was conducted to recognize the recycling consciousness of participants in an urban recycling promotional program. The urban recycling program analyzed in this study was administered by Zeytinburnu Municipality in Istanbul, Turkey. This program had about 10,000 active users at the time of this face-to-face survey conducted among 428 participants in 2021. Zeytinburnu is a densely populated municipality, with a greater majority residing in apartment buildings. The results revealed that about half of the survey population was spontaneous recyclers, and they would like to continue even if there was no reward, while the other half was in the program just for the reward. However, the findings also displayed the potential of the incentive mechanism to be used to enhance the pro-recycling behavior of its participants. This may be achieved through educational tools and providing solutions to ease the burden most apartment-dwelling participants carry with storage/transportation issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Betul Hande Gursoy Haksevenler & Aydin Akpinar & Hiroshan Hettiarachchi, 2023. "The Social Dimensions of an Incentive-Based Urban Recycling Program: A Case-Study from Istanbul, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15775-:d:1276875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15775/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15775/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timlett, R.E. & Williams, I.D., 2008. "Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 622-634.
    2. Hiroshan Hettiarachchi & Jay N. Meegoda & Sohyeon Ryu, 2018. "Organic Waste Buyback as a Viable Method to Enhance Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kawther Saeedi, 2024. "Promoting Sustainable Household Engagement in Recycling via Blockchain-Based Loyalty Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Hancong Ma & Mei Li & Xin Tong & Ping Dong, 2023. "Community-Level Household Waste Disposal Behavior Simulation and Visualization under Multiple Incentive Policies—An Agent-Based Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Muise, Isaac & Adams, Michelle & Côté, Ray & Price, G.W., 2016. "Attitudes to the recovery and recycling of agricultural plastics waste: A case study of Nova Scotia, Canada," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 137-145.
    4. Dhokhikah, Yeny & Trihadiningrum, Yulinah & Sunaryo, Sony, 2015. "Community participation in household solid waste reduction in Surabaya, Indonesia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 153-162.
    5. Fontecha, John E. & Nikolaev, Alexander & Walteros, Jose L. & Zhu, Zhenduo, 2022. "Scientists wanted? A literature review on incentive programs that promote pro-environmental consumer behavior: Energy, waste, and water," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    6. Sabbir Ahmed & Sameera Mubarak & Jia Tina Du & Santoso Wibowo, 2022. "Forecasting the Status of Municipal Waste in Smart Bins Using Deep Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Zhang, Suopeng & Zhang, Mingli & Yu, Xueying & Ren, Hao, 2016. "What keeps Chinese from recycling: Accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 176-186.
    8. Shira Daskal & Omar Asi & Isam Sabbah & Ofira Ayalon & Katie Baransi-Karkaby, 2022. "Decentralized Composting Analysis Model—Benefit/Cost Decision-Making Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Sarah Cotterill & Liz Richardson, 2010. "Expanding the Use of Experiments on Civic Behavior: Experiments with Local Government as a Research Partner," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 628(1), pages 148-164, March.
    10. Shalfoh, Ehsan & Ahmad, Mardiana Idayu & Binhweel, Fozy & Shaah, Marwan Abdulhakim & Senusi, Wardah & Hossain, Md Sohrab & Alsaadi, Sami, 2024. "Fish waste oil extraction using supercritical CO2 extraction for biodiesel production: Mathematical, and kinetic modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Arbués, Fernando & Villanúa, Inmaculada, 2016. "Determinants of behavior toward selective collection of batteries in Spain. A bivariate probit model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-8.
    12. S. Bhuvaneshwari & Hiroshan Hettiarachchi & Jay N. Meegoda, 2019. "Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Khandoker M. Maniruzzaman & Umar Lawal Dano & Faez S. AlShihri & Maher S. AlShammari & Sayed Mohammed S. Ahmed & Wadee Ahmed Ghanem Al-Gehlani & Tareq I. Alrawaf, 2022. "Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-26, October.
    14. Navarro Ferronato & Vincenzo Torretta, 2019. "Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    15. Willman, Kenneth W., 2015. "Information sharing and curbside recycling: A pilot study to evaluate the value of door-to-door distribution of informational literature," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 162-171.
    16. Nazatul Haron & Shaufique F. Sidique & Alias Radam, 2017. "Examining the Attributes of Electronic Waste Recycling Service: A Choice Modelling Approach," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Meetha Ram & Enrico Bracci, 2024. "Waste Management, Waste Indicators and the Relationship with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Waite, Steve & Cox, Paul & Tudor, Terry, 2015. "Strategies for local authorities to achieve the EU 2020 50% recycling, reuse and composting target: A case study of England," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 18-28.
    19. Boonrod, K. & Towprayoon, S. & Bonnet, S. & Tripetchkul, S., 2015. "Enhancing organic waste separation at the source behavior: A case study of the application of motivation mechanisms in communities in Thailand," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 77-90.
    20. Bernstad, A. & la Cour Jansen, J. & Aspegren, A., 2013. "Door-stepping as a strategy for improved food waste recycling behaviour – Evaluation of a full-scale experiment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 94-103.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15775-:d:1276875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.