IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v102y2015icp113-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cumulative Overall Resource Efficiency Assessment (COREA) for comparing bio-based products with their fossil-derived counterparts

Author

Listed:
  • Huysveld, Sophie
  • De Meester, Steven
  • Van linden, Veerle
  • Muylle, Hilde
  • Peiren, Nico
  • Lauwers, Ludwig
  • Dewulf, Jo

Abstract

Bio-based products potentially decrease consumption of non-renewable fossil resources compared to their fossil-derived counterparts, but are more demanding for bio-productive land use. Although thermodynamics-based resource accounting methods are available for calculating overall resource efficiency from a life cycle perspective, their accounting for bio-productive land resources as an input during quantification of efficiencies is unclear. This paper aims to fill the gap in scientific literature about how to calculate a cumulative overall resource efficiency indicator by developing a framework, called Cumulative Overall Resource Efficiency Assessment (COREA). COREA (i) takes into account bio-productive land resources and (ii) addresses the non-renewable character of fossil resources. To account for bio-productive land resources, two methodological questions need to be addressed: (1) “how to define the system boundary of the solar energy input in the primary biomass production system?” and (2) “how to choose the temporal system boundary of this system?”. Resource efficiencies are calculated for three cases at crop level and two cases at bio-based product level. To account for the non-renewable character of fossil resources, we propose an accounting approach that includes the ancient solar energy consumption of fossil resources. This methodological choice is illustrated through comparing the resource efficiencies of the two bio-based products with their fossil-based counterparts. The results showed that the bio-based products only had a higher resource efficiency than their fossil-derived counterparts if fossil resources were considered as ancient consumers of solar energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Huysveld, Sophie & De Meester, Steven & Van linden, Veerle & Muylle, Hilde & Peiren, Nico & Lauwers, Ludwig & Dewulf, Jo, 2015. "Cumulative Overall Resource Efficiency Assessment (COREA) for comparing bio-based products with their fossil-derived counterparts," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 113-127.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:102:y:2015:i:c:p:113-127
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915300264
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dewulf, Jo & Van Langenhove, Herman, 2005. "Integrating industrial ecology principles into a set of environmental sustainability indicators for technology assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 419-432.
    2. Taelman, Sue Ellen & De Meester, Steven & Schaubroeck, Thomas & Sakshaug, Egil & Alvarenga, Rodrigo A.F. & Dewulf, Jo, 2014. "Accounting for the occupation of the marine environment as a natural resource in life cycle assessment: An exergy based approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Wagendorp, Tim & Gulinck, Hubert & Coppin, Pol & Muys, Bart, 2006. "Land use impact evaluation in life cycle assessment based on ecosystem thermodynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 112-125.
    4. Huysman, Sofie & Sala, Serenella & Mancini, Lucia & Ardente, Fulvio & Alvarenga, Rodrigo A.F. & De Meester, Steven & Mathieux, Fabrice & Dewulf, Jo, 2015. "Toward a systematized framework for resource efficiency indicators," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 68-76.
    5. Pawelzik, P. & Carus, M. & Hotchkiss, J. & Narayan, R. & Selke, S. & Wellisch, M. & Weiss, M. & Wicke, B. & Patel, M.K., 2013. "Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 211-228.
    6. Font de Mora, Emilio & Torres, César & Valero, Antonio, 2012. "Assessment of biodiesel energy sustainability using the exergy return on investment concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 474-480.
    7. Van der Vorst, Geert & Swart, Pilar & Aelterman, Wim & Van Brecht, Andres & Graauwmans, Eddy & Van Langenhove, Herman & Dewulf, Jo, 2010. "Resource consumption of pharmaceutical waste solvent valorization alternatives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1386-1392.
    8. Huysveld, Sophie & Van linden, Veerle & De Meester, Steven & Peiren, Nico & Muylle, Hilde & Lauwers, Ludwig & Dewulf, Jo, 2015. "Resource use assessment of an agricultural system from a life cycle perspective – a dairy farm as case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 77-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Risse, Michael & Weber-Blaschke, Gabriele & Richter, Klaus, 2017. "Resource efficiency of multifunctional wood cascade chains using LCA and exergy analysis, exemplified by a case study for Germany," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 141-152.
    2. Miao, Chenglin & Fang, Debin & Sun, Liyan & Luo, Qiaoling, 2017. "Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 153-161.
    3. Ul-Durar, Shajara & Arshed, Noman & Anwar, Awais & Sharif, Arshian & Liu, Wei, 2023. "How does economic complexity affect natural resource extraction in resource rich countries?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Risse, Michael & Weber-Blaschke, Gabriele & Richter, Klaus, 2017. "Resource efficiency of multifunctional wood cascade chains using LCA and exergy analysis, exemplified by a case study for Germany," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 141-152.
    2. Hsing-Fu Kuo & Ko-Wan Tsou, 2017. "Modeling and Simulation of the Future Impacts of Urban Land Use Change on the Natural Environment by SLEUTH and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Colombo, Emanuela & Rocco, Matteo V. & Toro, Claudia & Sciubba, Enrico, 2015. "An exergy-based approach to the joint economic and environmental impact assessment of possible photovoltaic scenarios: A case study at a regional level in Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 64-74.
    4. Hu, Nan & Zheng, Bing, 2023. "Natural resources, education, and green economic development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    5. Huysveld, Sophie & Van Meensel, Jef & Van linden, Veerle & De Meester, Steven & Peiren, Nico & Muylle, Hilde & Dewulf, Jo & Lauwers, Ludwig, 2017. "Communicative farm-specific diagnosis of potential simultaneous savings in costs and natural resource demand of feed on dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 34-45.
    6. Susana Garrido Azevedo & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2017. "Proposal of a Sustainable Circular Index for Manufacturing Companies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Torres, César & Valero, Antonio & Valero, Alicia, 2013. "Exergoecology as a tool for ecological modelling. The case of the US food production chain," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 21-28.
    8. Chen, Minpeng & Sun, Fu & Shindo, Junko, 2016. "China’s agricultural nitrogen flows in 2011: Environmental assessment and management scenarios," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 10-27.
    9. Cambero, Claudia & Hans Alexandre, Mariane & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2015. "Life cycle greenhouse gas analysis of bioenergy generation alternatives using forest and wood residues in remote locations: A case study in British Columbia, Canada," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 59-72.
    10. Buytaert, V. & Muys, B. & Devriendt, N. & Pelkmans, L. & Kretzschmar, J.G. & Samson, R., 2011. "Towards integrated sustainability assessment for energetic use of biomass: A state of the art evaluation of assessment tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3918-3933.
    11. Hu, Yun & Wen, Zongguo & Lee, Jason C.K. & Luo, Enhua, 2017. "Assessing resource productivity for industrial parks using adjusted raw material consumption (ARMC)," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 42-49.
    12. Tedla, Abeje & Minale, Mesafint & Eshetu, Reta, 2020. "Determination of the Upper Limit Age of Jatropha Curcas Plantation for Optimum Yield Production," Asian Business Review, Asian Business Consortium, vol. 10(1), pages 37-42.
    13. Kuisma, Miia & Kahiluoto, Helena, 2017. "Biotic resource loss beyond food waste: Agriculture leaks worst," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 129-140.
    14. Kai Whiting & Luis Gabriel Carmona & Angeles Carrasco & Tânia Sousa, 2017. "Exergy Replacement Cost of Fossil Fuels: Closing the Carbon Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Taelman, Sue Ellen & De Meester, Steven & Schaubroeck, Thomas & Sakshaug, Egil & Alvarenga, Rodrigo A.F. & Dewulf, Jo, 2014. "Accounting for the occupation of the marine environment as a natural resource in life cycle assessment: An exergy based approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-10.
    16. Emilio Font de Mora & César Torres & Antonio Valero, 2015. "Thermoeconomic Analysis of Biodiesel Production from Used Cooking Oils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Godadaw Misganaw & Robert Baars & Marco Verschuur & Biruh Tesfahun & Sara Endale & Demeke Haile, 2021. "Carbon footprint in the downstream dairy value chain in Ziway-Hawassa milk shed, Ethiopia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8348-8364, June.
    18. Liu, Jian & Zuo, Jian & Sun, Zhiyu & Zillante, George & Chen, Xianming, 2013. "Sustainability in hydropower development—A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 230-237.
    19. Rocco, Matteo V. & Di Lucchio, Alberto & Colombo, Emanuela, 2017. "Exergy Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production from Waste-to-Energy technology: A Hybrid Input-Output approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 832-844.
    20. Zhao, Linhai & Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan, 2023. "Role of natural resources utilization efficiency in achieving green economic recovery: Evidence from BRICS countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:102:y:2015:i:c:p:113-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.