IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v221y2020ics0925527319302993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive description of the Product-Service Systems’ cost estimation process: An integrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Rodríguez, Arturo Estrada
  • Pezzotta, Giuditta
  • Pinto, Roberto
  • Romero, David

Abstract

The transition from the traditional product-centric approach to the offering of integrated product service solutions, such as Product-Service Systems (PSS), has represented a major managerial challenge for companies. A major contributor to such challenge has been the inability of the Cost Estimation Process to deal with the novelty and complexity of PSS solutions, where in particular, cost under-estimation has triggered inadequate contract decisions such as under-pricing. To this end, the academic literature has extensively investigated how the PSS context has modified the cost estimation process and how it has exacerbated cost unpredictability. However, research contributions are limited to specific elements within the estimation process, where a picture of the whole process has not been yet investigated. This paper presents a comprehensive description of the whole PSS Cost Estimation Process derived from an Integrative Review that summarizes and subsumes current empirical/theoretical advancements and methodological approaches in literature. This study evidences how the PSS Cost Estimation Process differs from traditional cost estimation frameworks such as Life Cycle Costing (LCC) at various degrees, and how it is related to other interdependent processes such as PSS Engineering and PSS Contract Design. Moreover, this work suggests that cost unpredictability represents an inherent property of the PSS context, and discusses how identified properties at the process-level help to better investigate cost uncertainty. Finally, this paper evidences research gaps that inform future research, and provides a set of recommendations that call for the development of new bespoke cost estimation frameworks for the PSS context.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodríguez, Arturo Estrada & Pezzotta, Giuditta & Pinto, Roberto & Romero, David, 2020. "A comprehensive description of the Product-Service Systems’ cost estimation process: An integrative review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:221:y:2020:i:c:s0925527319302993
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527319302993
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin Shen & John Ahmet Erkoyuncu & Rajkumar Roy & Bin Wu, 2017. "A framework for cost evaluation in product service system configuration," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(20), pages 6120-6144, October.
    2. Settanni, Ettore & Newnes, Linda B. & Thenent, Nils E. & Parry, Glenn & Goh, Yee Mey, 2014. "A through-life costing methodology for use in product–service-systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 161-177.
    3. Batista, Luciano & Davis-Poynter, Simon & Ng, Irene & Maull, Roger, 2017. "Servitization through outcome-based contract – A systems perspective from the defence industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 133-143.
    4. Grubic, Tonci & Jennions, Ian, 2018. "Do outcome-based contracts exist? The investigation of power-by-the-hour and similar result-oriented cases," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 209-219.
    5. Kreye, M.E. & Goh, Y.M. & Newnes, L.B. & Goodwin, P., 2012. "Approaches to displaying information to assist decisions under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 682-692.
    6. Alexander Shapiro & Jos Berge, 2002. "Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 79-94, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farsi, Maryam & Erkoyuncu, John Ahmet, 2021. "An agent-based approach to quantify the uncertainty in Product-Service System contract decisions: A case study in the machine tool industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Nowak, Piotr Bolesław, 2016. "The MLE of the mean of the exponential distribution based on grouped data is stochastically increasing," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 49-54.
    3. Camilo Alberto Cárdenas-Hurtado & Aaron Levi Garavito-Acosta & Jorge Hernán Toro-Córdoba, 2018. "Asymmetric Effects of Terms of Trade Shocks on Tradable and Non-tradable Investment Rates: The Colombian Case," Borradores de Economia 1043, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    4. Anastasiou, Andreas, 2017. "Bounds for the normal approximation of the maximum likelihood estimator from m-dependent random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 171-181.
    5. Evelina Di Corso & Tania Cerquitelli & Daniele Apiletti, 2018. "METATECH: METeorological Data Analysis for Thermal Energy CHaracterization by Means of Self-Learning Transparent Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Silva, Ivair R., 2017. "Confidence intervals through sequential Monte Carlo," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 112-124.
    7. Denter, Philipp & Sisak, Dana, 2015. "Do polls create momentum in political competition?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Salgado Alfredo, 2018. "Incomplete Information and Costly Signaling in College Admissions," Working Papers 2018-23, Banco de México.
    9. Albrecht, James & Anderson, Axel & Vroman, Susan, 2010. "Search by committee," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(4), pages 1386-1407, July.
    10. Stegeman, Alwin, 2016. "A new method for simultaneous estimation of the factor model parameters, factor scores, and unique parts," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 189-203.
    11. Mauricio Romero & Ã lvaro Riascos & Diego Jara, 2015. "On the Optimality of Answer-Copying Indices," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(5), pages 435-453, October.
    12. Chen, Yunxiao & Moustaki, Irini & Zhang, H, 2020. "A note on likelihood ratio tests for models with latent variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107490, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Blier-Wong, Christopher & Cossette, Hélène & Marceau, Etienne, 2023. "Risk aggregation with FGM copulas," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 102-120.
    14. Zhu, Qiansheng & Lang, Joseph B., 2022. "Test-inversion confidence intervals for estimands in contingency tables subject to equality constraints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    15. van Bentum, Thomas & Cramer, Erhard, 2019. "Stochastic monotonicity of MLEs of the mean for exponentially distributed lifetimes under hybrid censoring," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-8.
    16. Yusuke Narita, 2021. "A Theory of Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of School Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4982-5010, August.
    17. Grant J. Cameron & Hai‐Anh H. Dang & Mustafa Dinc & James Foster & Michael M. Lokshin, 2021. "Measuring the Statistical Capacity of Nations," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(4), pages 870-896, August.
    18. Martinez, Veronica & Neely, Andy & Velu, Chander & Leinster-Evans, Stewart & Bisessar, Dav, 2017. "Exploring the journey to services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 66-80.
    19. Simon Bruhn & Thomas Grebel & Lionel Nesta, 2023. "The fallacy in productivity decomposition," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 797-835, July.
    20. Schaarschmidt, Frank & Gerhard, Daniel & Vogel, Charlotte, 2017. "Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparisons of several multinomial samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 65-76.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:221:y:2020:i:c:s0925527319302993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.