IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v208y2019icp140-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical analysis of productivity enhancement strategies in the North American automotive industry

Author

Listed:
  • Abolhassani, Amir
  • James Harner, E.
  • Jaridi, Majid

Abstract

Even though there is a pressing need for continuous productivity improvement, studies that employ robust empirical analysis of strategies and factors to enhance productivity in the North American Automotive Industry are very scarce. In this study, robust and hybrid models of the most popular productivity measurement in the automotive industry, Hours per Vehicle (HPV), is developed. Data examined in this research was compiled for a 9-year period, 1999–2007, for North American automotive manufacturers. Through practical considerations and a comprehensive literature review, 14 important variables that influence HPV were defined and developed. A hybrid method, the combination of multiple M-estimators and a lasso, was developed and was shown to be the best method to determine a robust regression model to estimate HPV. The vehicle variety, number of available working days in a year, car model types, new model launch, and car assembly and capacity utilization penalize HPV. However, annual production volume, flexible and lean manufacturing, platform sharing strategy, and year of production improve HPV. Using lean and flexible manufacturing, platform strategy, and reducing the percentage of hourly employees help improve productivity and reduce HPV while launching a new vehicle. Additionally, Japanese plants were appeared to be the benchmark with respect to HPV, followed by joint ventures and American plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Abolhassani, Amir & James Harner, E. & Jaridi, Majid, 2019. "Empirical analysis of productivity enhancement strategies in the North American automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 140-159.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:208:y:2019:i:c:p:140-159
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527318304535
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2007. "Complementarities in automobile production," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(7), pages 1315-1345.
    2. Sheikh Zahoor Sarwar & Azam Ishaque & Nadeem Ehsan & Danial Saeed Pirzada & Zafar Moeen Nasir, 2012. "Identifying productivity blemishes in Pakistan automotive industry: a case study," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(2), pages 173-193, January.
    3. Anandasivam Gopal & Manu Goyal & Serguei Netessine & Matthew Reindorp, 2013. "The Impact of New Product Introduction on Plant Productivity in the North American Automotive Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2217-2236, October.
    4. Harry C. Katz & Thomas A. Kochan & Jeffrey H. Keefe, 1987. "Industrial Relations and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 18(3, Specia), pages 685-728.
    5. Martin N. Baily & Diana Farrell & Ezra Greenberg & Jan-Dirk Henrich & Naoko Jinjo & Maya Jolles & Jaana Remes, 2005. "Increasing global competition and labor productivity: lessons from the U.S. automotive industry," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    6. Amir Abolhassani & James Harner & Majid Jaridi & Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan, 2018. "Productivity enhancement strategies in North American automotive industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 1414-1431, February.
    7. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Irani, Zahir & Choy, King-Lun & Filippi, Lionel & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2015. "Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: A review for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 153-166.
    8. Deqiang Liu & Yanyun Zhao, 2006. "Ownership, Foreign Investment and Productivity--A Case Study of the Automotive Industry in China," Microeconomics Working Papers 21892, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    9. Amir Abolhassani & Majid Jaridi, 2016. "Productivity enhancement in North American automotive industry," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(8), pages 1112-1136, November.
    10. Yu, Kangkang & Cadeaux, Jack & Luo, Ben Nanfeng, 2015. "Operational flexibility: Review and meta-analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 190-202.
    11. Aoki, Katsuki & Staeblein, Thomas & Tomino, Takahiro, 2014. "Monozukuri capability to address product variety: A comparison between Japanese and German automotive makers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 373-384.
    12. Kenyon, G.N. & Meixell, M.J. & Westfall, P.H., 2016. "Production outsourcing and operational performance: An empirical study using secondary data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P3), pages 336-349.
    13. Marvin B. Lieberman & Lieven Demeester, 1999. "Inventory Reduction and Productivity Growth: Linkages in the Japanese Automotive Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 466-485, April.
    14. Piran, Fabio Antonio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Camargo, Luis Felipe Riehs & Viero, Carlos Frederico & Dresch, Aline & Cauchick-Miguel, Paulo Augusto, 2016. "Product modularization and effects on efficiency: An analysis of a bus manufacturer using data envelopment analysis (DEA)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Koller, Manuel & Stahel, Werner A., 2011. "Sharpening Wald-type inference in robust regression for small samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(8), pages 2504-2515, August.
    16. Ortega Jimenez, Cesar H. & Machuca, Jose A.D. & Garrido-Vega, Pedro & Filippini, Roberto, 2015. "The pursuit of responsiveness in production environments: From flexibility to reconfigurability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 157-172.
    17. Shruti Gupta & Asha Prasad, 2011. "Productivity‐based hybrid model: learning from the Indo‐Japanese and Indian auto sector," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 158-171, May.
    18. Barbosa, Luziane Machado & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Piran, Fabio Antonio Sartori & Dresch, Aline, 2017. "Exploratory analysis of the variables prevailing on the effects of product modularization on production volume and efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 677-690.
    19. Staeblein, Thomas & Aoki, Katsuki, 2015. "Planning and scheduling in the automotive industry: A comparison of industrial practice at German and Japanese makers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 258-272.
    20. Jeffrey M. Alden & Lawrence D. Burns & Theodore Costy & Richard D. Hutton & Craig A. Jackson & David S. Kim & Kevin A. Kohls & Jonathan H. Owen & Mark A. Turnquist & David J. Vander Veen, 2006. "General Motors Increases Its Production Throughput," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 6-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bottmer, Lea & Croux, Christophe & Wilms, Ines, 2022. "Sparse regression for large data sets with outliers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 782-794.
    2. Maynard, M. Travis & Falcone, Ellie C. & Petersen, Kenneth J. & Fugate, Brian S. & Bonney, Leff, 2020. "Conflicting paradigms in manufacturing and marketing decisions: The effects of situational awareness on team performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Rubio, Francisco & Llopis-Albert, Carlos & Valero, Francisco, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization of costs and energy efficiency associated with autonomous industrial processes for sustainable growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Tero Rantala & Mina Nasiri & Hannu Rantanen, 2020. "Preceding operational capabilities as antecedents for productivity and innovation performance," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 537-561, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Antonio Sartori Piran & Alaércio De Paris & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Luis Felipe Riehs Camargo & Rosiane Serrano & Ricardo Augusto Cassel, 2020. "Overall Equipment Effectiveness: Required but not Enough—An Analysis Integrating Overall Equipment Effect and Data Envelopment Analysis," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(2), pages 191-206, June.
    2. Soledad Giardili & Kamalini Ramdas & Jonathan W. Williams, 2023. "Leadership and Productivity: A Study of U.S. Automobile Assembly Plants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1500-1517, March.
    3. Seog-Chan Oh & Jaemin Shin, 2021. "The Assessment of Car Making Plants with an Integrated Stochastic Frontier Analysis Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Chuang, Chia-Hung & Zhao, Yabing, 2019. "Demand stimulation in finished-goods inventory management: Empirical evidence from General Motors dealerships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 208-220.
    5. DeCampos, Hugo A. & Rosales, Claudia R. & Narayanan, Sriram, 2022. "Supply chain horizontal complexity and the moderating impact of inventory turns: A study of the automotive component industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Rachna Shah & George P. Ball & Serguei Netessine, 2017. "Plant Operations and Product Recalls in the Automotive Industry: An Empirical Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(8), pages 2439-2459, August.
    7. Amir Abolhassani & Gale Boyd & Majid Jaridi & Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan & James Harner, 2023. "“Is Energy That Different from Labor?” Similarity in Determinants of Intensity for Auto Assembly Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-35, February.
    8. Pournader, Mehrdokht & Kach, Andrew & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph, 2019. "Outsourcing performance quality assessment using data envelopment analytics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 173-182.
    9. Wochner, Sina & Grunow, Martin & Staeblein, Thomas & Stolletz, Raik, 2016. "Planning for ramp-ups and new product introductions in the automotive industry: Extending sales and operations planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 372-383.
    10. Chuang, Chia-Hung & Chiang, Chung-Yean, 2016. "Dynamic and stochastic behavior of coefficient of demand uncertainty incorporated with EOQ variables: An application in finished-goods inventory from General Motors׳ dealerships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 95-109.
    11. Piran, Fabio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Camanho, Ana S. & Silva, Maria C.A., 2021. "Internal benchmarking to assess the cost efficiency of a broiler production system combining data envelopment analysis and throughput accounting," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    12. Stentoft, Jan & Mikkelsen, Ole Stegmann & Jensen, Jesper Kronborg & Rajkumar, Christopher, 2018. "Performance outcomes of offshoring, backshoring and staying at home manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 199-208.
    13. Chiang, Chung-Yean & Qian, Zhuang & Chuang, Chia-Hung & Tang, Xiao & Chou, Chia-Ching, 2023. "Examining demand and supply-chain antecedents of inventory dynamics: Evidence from automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    14. Garvan Whelan & Paul Hanly & Vincent O’Connell & Oldřich Ludwig Dittrich & Naser Abu Ghazalah, 2021. "Impact on Firm Liquidity Arising from Outsourcing Decisions as Evidenced by Off-Balance-Sheet Disclosures," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 27(1), pages 17-27, February.
    15. Visani, Franco & Boccali, Filippo, 2020. "Purchasing price assessment of leverage items: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. Fabricio Eidelwein & Fabio Antonio Sartori Piran & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Aline Dresch & Luis Henrique Rodrigues, 2018. "Exploratory Analysis of Modularization Strategy Based on the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 111-122, June.
    17. Anandasivam Gopal & Manu Goyal & Serguei Netessine & Matthew Reindorp, 2013. "The Impact of New Product Introduction on Plant Productivity in the North American Automotive Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2217-2236, October.
    18. Aoki, Katsuki & Staeblein, Thomas, 2018. "Monozukuri capability and dynamic product variety: An analysis of the design-manufacturing interface at Japanese and German automakers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 70, pages 33-45.
    19. Telles, Eduardo Santos & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Morandi, Maria Isabel Wolf Motta & Piran, Fabio Antonio Sartori, 2020. "Drum-buffer-rope in an engineering-to-order system: An analysis of an aerospace manufacturer using data envelopment analysis (DEA)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    20. Arana-Solares, Iván Andrés & Ortega-Jiménez, César H. & Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela & Pérez-Díez de los Ríos, José Luis, 2019. "Contextual factors intervening in the manufacturing strategy and technology management-performance relationship," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 81-95.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:208:y:2019:i:c:p:140-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.