IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v205y2018icp47-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain coordination and innovativeness: A social contagion and learning perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Siyu
  • Zhao, Xiande
  • Huo, Baofeng

Abstract

This study investigates relationships among various types of supply chain coordination, innovativeness, and financial performance. Social contagion theory is mainly used to construct a research framework. Two underlining contagion mechanisms, cohesion and structural equivalence, were identified for various supply chain relationships. Data was collected from 617 Chinese manufacturers and employed to test the theoretical model. The results show that supplier coordination positively influences manufacturer, customer coordination, and supplier innovativeness. Manufacturer coordination promotes customer coordination and manufacturer innovativeness. Supplier innovativeness directly improves manufacturer innovativeness and indirectly enhances financial performance through manufacturer innovativeness. Customer coordination and manufacturer innovativeness positively influence financial performance. This study contributes significantly to theories and practices of supply chain coordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Siyu & Zhao, Xiande & Huo, Baofeng, 2018. "Supply chain coordination and innovativeness: A social contagion and learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 47-61.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:205:y:2018:i:c:p:47-61
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527318302986
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhiqiang Wang & Baofeng Huo & Yu Tian & Zhongsheng Hua, 2015. "Effects of external uncertainties and power on opportunism in supply chains: evidence from China," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6294-6307, October.
    2. Ai-Hsuan Chiang & Wun-Hwa Chen & Soushan Wu, 2015. "Does high supply chain integration enhance customer response speed?," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1-2), pages 24-43, January.
    3. Clifford W. Scherer & Hichang Cho, 2003. "A Social Network Contagion Theory of Risk Perception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 261-267, April.
    4. Rebecca A. Grant & Chris A. Higgins, 1991. "The Impact of Computerized Performance Monitoring on Service Work: Testing a Causal Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 116-142, June.
    5. Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela & Marin-Garcia, Juan A. & Medina-Lopez, Carmen, 2015. "An analysis of the direct and mediated effects of employee commitment and supply chain integration on organisational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 242-257.
    6. He, Yuanqiong & Keung Lai, Kin & Sun, Hongyi & Chen, Yun, 2014. "The impact of supplier integration on customer integration and new product performance: The mediating role of manufacturing flexibility under trust theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 260-270.
    7. Jeremiah J Sullivan & Ikujiro Nonaka, 1986. "The Application of Organizational Learning Theory to Japanese and American Management," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 17(3), pages 127-147, September.
    8. Disney, S. M. & Towill, D. R. & van de Velde, W., 2004. "Variance amplification and the golden ratio in production and inventory control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 295-309, August.
    9. Ronald S. Burt, 1978. "Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence as a Basis for Network Subgroups," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 7(2), pages 189-212, November.
    10. Huo, Baofeng & Han, Zhaojun & Zhao, Xiande & Zhou, Honggeng & Wood, Craig H. & Zhai, Xin, 2013. "The impact of institutional pressures on supplier integration and financial performance: Evidence from China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 82-94.
    11. Kim, Minkyun & Chai, Sangmi, 2017. "The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 42-52.
    12. Clayton M. Christensen & Fernando F. Suárez & James M. Utterback, 1998. "Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-2), pages 207-220, December.
    13. Midlarsky, Manus I., 1978. "Analyzing Diffusion and Contagion Effects: The Urban Disorders of the 1960s," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 996-1008, September.
    14. Fan, Huan & Li, Gang & Sun, Hongyi & Cheng, T.C.E., 2017. "An information processing perspective on supply chain risk management: Antecedents, mechanism, and consequences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 63-75.
    15. Argote, Linda & Ingram, Paul, 2000. "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 150-169, May.
    16. Barbara B. Flynn & Xenophon Koufteros & Guanyi Lu, 2016. "On Theory in Supply Chain Uncertainty and its Implications for Supply Chain Integration," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 3-27, July.
    17. Erlend Nybakk, 2012. "Learning Orientation, Innovativeness And Financial Performance In Traditional Manufacturing Firms: A Higher-Order Structural Equation Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1-28.
    18. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    19. Rajdeep Grewal & Gary L. Lilien & Girish Mallapragada, 2006. "Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1043-1056, July.
    20. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Wong, Chee Yew & Boon-itt, Sakun, 2013. "The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 566-574.
    21. Matsuo, Makoto, 2006. "Customer orientation, conflict, and innovativeness in Japanese sales departments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 242-250, February.
    22. Peter V. Marsden & Noah E. Friedkin, 1993. "Network Studies of Social Influence," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 22(1), pages 127-151, August.
    23. Arshinder & Kanda, Arun & Deshmukh, S.G., 2008. "Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 316-335, October.
    24. Gu, Qiannong & Jitpaipoon, Thawatchai & Yang, Jie, 2017. "The impact of information integration on financial performance: A knowledge-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 221-232.
    25. Yu, Wantao & Jacobs, Mark A. & Salisbury, W. David & Enns, Harvey, 2013. "The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 346-358.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Zhiqiang & Chen, Xiaoli & Zhang, Shanshan & Yin, Ying & Zhao, Xiande, 2022. "The impact of political ties on firm innovativeness: Testing a mediation and moderation model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 523-534.
    2. Xiue Zhang & Yuan Le & Qiao Meng & Xinyu Teng, 2023. "Green entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance in Chinese firms: The role of stakeholder engagement and green absorptive capacity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1082-1095, May.
    3. Fei Jiang & Filzah Md Isa & Sin Pei Ng & Mariam Bhatti, 2023. "The Impact of Supply Chain Integration to Supply Chain Responsiveness in Chinese Electronics Manufacturing Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    4. Ting Kong & Taiwen Feng & Baofeng Huo, 2021. "Green supply chain integration and financial performance: A social contagion and information sharing perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2255-2270, July.
    5. Sabari R. Prasanna, 2022. "The role of supplier innovativeness in the humanitarian context," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1359-1377, December.
    6. Wenwen Zhao & Taiwen Feng & Xuexiang Xin & Guangyi Hao, 2021. "How to respond to competitors' green success for improving performance: The moderating role of organizational ambidexterity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 489-506, January.
    7. Ahmad Fadavi & Fariborz Jolai & Ata Allah Taleizadeh, 2022. "Green product design in a supply chain with considering marketing under competition and coordination," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11721-11759, October.
    8. Stolze, Hannah J. & Brusco, Michael J. & Smith, Jeffery S., 2021. "Exploring the social mechanisms for variation reduction for direct store delivery (DSD) and vendor managed inventory performance: An integrated network governance and coordination theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Ming Zhang & Jianjun Zhu & Ponnambalam Kumaraswamy & Hehua Wang, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Effects of Problem Size and the Problem Proposing Mechanism on the Problem Processing Mechanism in a New Main Manufacturer–Supplier Collaborative System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Siyu & Huo, Baofeng & Han, Zhaojun, 2022. "A literature review towards theories and conceptual models of empirical studies on supply chain integration and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    2. Acar, Yavuz & Atadeniz, Sukran Nilvana, 2015. "Comparison of integrated and local planning approaches for the supply network of a globally-dispersed enterprise," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 204-219.
    3. Chen, Meng & Tang, Xinlin & Liu, Hefu & Gu, Jibao, 2023. "The impact of supply chain concentration on integration and business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Ataseven, Cigdem & Nair, Anand, 2017. "Assessment of supply chain integration and performance relationships: A meta-analytic investigation of the literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 252-265.
    5. Prajogo, Daniel & Toy, Jordan & Bhattacharya, Ananya & Oke, Adegoke & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "The relationships between information management, process management and operational performance: Internal and external contexts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 95-103.
    6. Franck Brulhart & Uche Okongwu & Btissam Moncef, 2015. "Causal linkages between supply chain management practices and performance: a balanced scorecard strategy map perspective," Post-Print halshs-01239670, HAL.
    7. Shivam Gupta & Vinayak A. Drave & Surajit Bag & Zongwei Luo, 2019. "Leveraging Smart Supply Chain and Information System Agility for Supply Chain Flexibility," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 547-564, June.
    8. Hotlan Siagian & Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan & Ferry Jie, 2021. "Supply Chain Integration Enables Resilience, Flexibility, and Innovation to Improve Business Performance in COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Cong Wang & Zongbao Zou & Shidao Geng, 2021. "Green Technology Investment in a Decentralized Supply Chain under Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Awe, Olajumoke A. & Woodside, Arch G. & Nerur, Sridhar & Prater, Edmund, 2020. "Capturing heterogeneities in orchestrating resources for accurately forecasting high (separately low) project management performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    11. Miklós Pakurár & Hossam Haddad & János Nagy & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2019. "The Impact of Supply Chain Integration and Internal Control on Financial Performance in the Jordanian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Amalesh Sharma & V. Kumar & Sourav Bikash Borah & Anirban Adhikary, 2022. "Complexity in a multinational enterprise’s global supply chain and its international business performance: A bane or a boon?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(5), pages 850-878, July.
    13. Sener, Abdurrezzak & Barut, Mehmet & Oztekin, Asil & Avcilar, Mutlu Yuksel & Yildirim, Mehmet Bayram, 2019. "The role of information usage in a retail supply chain: A causal data mining and analytical modeling approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 87-104.
    14. Abdurrezzak Sener & Mehmet Barut & Ali Dag & Mehmet Bayram Yildirim, 2021. "Impact of commitment, information sharing, and information usage on supplier performance: a Bayesian belief network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 125-158, August.
    15. Bimpizas-Pinis, Meletios & Calzolari, Tommaso & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "Exploring the transition towards circular supply chains through the arcs of integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    16. Qi, Yinan & Huo, Baofeng & Wang, Zhiqiang & Yeung, Hoi Yan Jeff, 2017. "The impact of operations and supply chain strategies on integration and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 162-174.
    17. Ting Kong & Taiwen Feng & Baofeng Huo, 2021. "Green supply chain integration and financial performance: A social contagion and information sharing perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2255-2270, July.
    18. Watabaji, Mulugeta D. & Molnar, Adrienn & Dora, Manoj K. & Gellynck, Xavier, 2016. "The influence of value chain integration on performance: an empirical study of the malt barley value chain in Ethiopia," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(4), August.
    19. Wong, Chee Yew & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Boon-itt, Sakun, 2017. "Do arcs of integration differ across industries? Methodology extension and empirical evidence from Thailand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 223-234.
    20. Sabari R. Prasanna, 2022. "The role of supplier innovativeness in the humanitarian context," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1359-1377, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:205:y:2018:i:c:p:47-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.