IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v183y2017ipcp654-666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Yingjie
  • Schwartz, Frank
  • Voß, Stefan

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of diverse transportation modes for a global supply chain (SC) in stochastic environments. The motivation of our paper is to investigate the idea of enabling a global flexible SC with disruptive risks in making it less vulnerable by applying diverse transportation modes which is also our first contribution. The flexibility stems from the fact that transportation modes with a low-speed transportation contain latent time buffers that can be used by accelerating transport activities. This represents a promising approach to make supply chains (SCs) more flexible and to establish an additional degree of freedom in order to manage stochastic events like minor disruptions or serious catastrophes. In this paper, a stochastic programming model for a multi-stage multi-product SC is developed. SC partners, including multiple suppliers, a processing center, two assembling centers, multiple distribution centers and retailers, are incorporated into the model. The second contribution of this paper is that different types of possible future catastrophic disruptions are quantified and included in the model. SC catastrophic disruptions like transportation delays or the fact that a SC node is disrupted by a serious catastrophe are stochastic factors of our model. The model is solved by using PySP, a specific modeling and stochastic programming framework. In order to show the quality of solutions of the stochastic programming model (SP solutions), a large amount of scenarios is generated to simulate the real case for each instance. The expected SC costs for these scenarios will be evaluated based on SP solutions and wait-and-see solutions, which are benchmarks. In addition, decision makers with neutral, optimistic and pessimistic attitudes regarding the occurrence of disruptions are also simulated and evaluated in the computational experiments. Managerial insights are concluded from computational results. The most important conclusion is that proper transportation mode planning enables a flexible global supply chain. Further conclusions like the quality of stochastic solutions and solutions of simulating decision makers with neutral, optimistic and pessimistic attitudes, as well as the most beneficial transportation modes in SCs with uncertain environments are proposed based on the computational results.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Yingjie & Schwartz, Frank & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 654-666.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:183:y:2017:i:pc:p:654-666
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527316302134
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Paul Watson & David Woodruff, 2011. "Progressive hedging innovations for a class of stochastic mixed-integer resource allocation problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 355-370, November.
    2. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    3. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    4. R. T. Rockafellar & Roger J.-B. Wets, 1991. "Scenarios and Policy Aggregation in Optimization Under Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 119-147, February.
    5. Yueyue Fan & Changzheng Liu, 2010. "Solving Stochastic Transportation Network Protection Problems Using the Progressive Hedging-based Method," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 193-208, June.
    6. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    7. Michael Maloni & Jomon Aliyas Paul & David M Gligor, 2013. "Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(2), pages 151-171, June.
    8. Haugen, Kjetil K. & Lokketangen, Arne & Woodruff, David L., 2001. "Progressive hedging as a meta-heuristic applied to stochastic lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 116-122, July.
    9. John M. Mulvey & Hercules Vladimirou, 1992. "Stochastic Network Programming for Financial Planning Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(11), pages 1642-1664, November.
    10. Stefan Voß & David L. Woodruff, 2006. "Introduction to Computational Optimization Models for Production Planning in a Supply Chain," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-29879-3, July.
    11. Fan, Yingjie & Schwartz, Frank & Voß, Stefan, 2014. "Flexible Supply Chain Design under Stochastic Catastrophic Risks," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18, volume 18, pages 379-406, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    12. Julia Pahl & Stefan Voß & David Woodruff, 2007. "Production planning with load dependent lead times: an update of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 297-345, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rubén Jesús Pérez-López & Jesús Everardo Olguín Tiznado & María Mojarro Magaña & Claudia Camargo Wilson & Juan Andrés López Barreras & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz, 2019. "Information Sharing with ICT in Production Systems and Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Engebrethsen, Erna & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane, 2019. "Transportation mode selection in inventory models: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 1-25.
    3. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Ahmadi, Hossein & Gastélum-Chavira, Diego & Ahumada-Valenzuela, Omar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel, 2023. "Humanitarian logistics optimization models: An investigation of decision-maker involvement and directions to promote implementation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yingjie Fan & Frank Schwartz & Stefan Voß & David L. Woodruff, 2017. "Stochastic programming for flexible global supply chain planning," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 601-633, December.
    2. Yongxi (Eric) Huang & Yueyue Fan & Chien-Wei Chen, 2014. "An Integrated Biofuel Supply Chain to Cope with Feedstock Seasonality and Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 540-554, November.
    3. Fan, Yueyue & Huang, Yongxi & Chen, Chien-Wei, 2012. "Multistage Infrastructure System Design: An Integrated Biofuel Supply Chain against Feedstock Seasonality and Uncertainty," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9g8413m5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Serhat Gul & Brian T. Denton & John W. Fowler, 2015. "A Progressive Hedging Approach for Surgery Planning Under Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 755-772, November.
    5. Lanza, Giacomo & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Rei, Walter & Ricciardi, Nicoletta, 2021. "Scheduled service network design with quality targets and stochastic travel times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 30-46.
    6. Wu, Dexiang & Wu, Desheng Dash, 2020. "A decision support approach for two-stage multi-objective index tracking using improved lagrangian decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Wei Xu & Dong-Ping Song, 2022. "Integrated optimisation for production capacity, raw material ordering and production planning under time and quantity uncertainties based on two case studies," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2343-2371, July.
    8. Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Sanei Bajgiran, Omid & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2016. "A hybrid scenario cluster decomposition algorithm for supply chain tactical planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 466-476.
    9. Sodhi, ManMohan S. & Tang, Christopher S., 2009. "Modeling supply-chain planning under demand uncertainty using stochastic programming: A survey motivated by asset-liability management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 728-738, October.
    10. Huang, Zhouchun & Zheng, Qipeng Phil, 2020. "A multistage stochastic programming approach for preventive maintenance scheduling of GENCOs with natural gas contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1036-1051.
    11. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    12. Tobias Rebs & Marcus Brandenburg & Stefan Seuring & Margarita Stohler, 2018. "Stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chain management: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative studies," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(2), pages 197-237, September.
    13. Chen, Chien-Wei & Fan, Yueyue, 2012. "Bioethanol supply chain system planning under supply and demand uncertainties," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 150-164.
    14. Poudel, Sushil Raj & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan, 2016. "A hybrid decomposition algorithm for designing a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-25.
    15. Weskamp, Christoph & Koberstein, Achim & Schwartz, Frank & Suhl, Leena & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "A two-stage stochastic programming approach for identifying optimal postponement strategies in supply chains with uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 123-138.
    16. Sheng, Xiaoming & Chew, Ek Peng & Lee, Loo Hay, 2015. "(s,S) policy model for liner shipping refueling and sailing speed optimization problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 76-92.
    17. Zhaomiao Guo & Yueyue Fan, 2017. "A Stochastic Multi-agent Optimization Model for Energy Infrastructure Planning under Uncertainty in An Oligopolistic Market," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 581-609, June.
    18. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    19. Bendul, Julia C. & Skorna, Alexander C.H., 2016. "Exploring impact factors of shippers’ risk prevention activities: A European survey in transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 206-223.
    20. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:183:y:2017:i:pc:p:654-666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.