IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v179y2016icp228-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain complexity and risk mitigation – A hybrid optimization–simulation model

Author

Listed:
  • Ge, Houtian
  • Nolan, James
  • Gray, Richard
  • Goetz, Stephan
  • Han, Yicheol

Abstract

With food safety a growing concern in agriculture, the structure and management of agricultural supply chains has become a significant policy issue. In turn, agricultural supply chains are often analytically complex, characterized by feedback and time sensitive, often random parameters. Modern commodity chains such as wheat handling in Canada are no exception. Recently, the Canadian government classes of wheat, replacing it by a new wheat segregation system that relies on trust and self-declaration of wheat type by individual farmers. To maintain food safety as well as operate cost-effectively in this new trust-based system, wheat handlers may be forced to develop a set of contamination testing strategies to maintain historical wheat quality and consistency. In contrast to much of the extant literature, this research builds a hybrid optimization-simulation model representing the new Canadian wheat supply chain, with the goal of identifying cost efficient varietal testing strategies. After solving for a base scenario, sensitivity analysis is conducted on key variables that influence wheat quality testing strategies. Our results validate the utility of currently employed wheat quality testing strategies in the Canadian supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Ge, Houtian & Nolan, James & Gray, Richard & Goetz, Stephan & Han, Yicheol, 2016. "Supply chain complexity and risk mitigation – A hybrid optimization–simulation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 228-238.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:179:y:2016:i:c:p:228-238
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527316301190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hung, Wing Yan & Samsatli, Nouri J. & Shah, Nilay, 2006. "Object-oriented dynamic supply-chain modelling incorporated with production scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 1064-1076, March.
    2. S. Andrew Starbird, 2005. "Moral Hazard, Inspection Policy, and Food Safety," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(1), pages 15-27.
    3. Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2008. "Procurement Strategies to Improve Quality Consistency in Wheat Shipments," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Musshoff, Oliver & Hirschauer, Norbert, 2007. "What benefits are to be derived from improved farm program planning approaches? - The role of time series models and stochastic optimization," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 95(1-3), pages 11-27, December.
    5. Sébastien Pouliot & Daniel A. Sumner, 2008. "Traceability, Liability, and Incentives for Food Safety and Quality," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(1), pages 15-27.
    6. Akanle, O.M. & Zhang, D.Z., 2008. "Agent-based model for optimising supply-chain configurations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 444-460, October.
    7. Starbird, S. Andrew, 2000. "Designing Food Safety Regulations: The Effect Of Inspection Policy And Penalties For Noncompliance On Food Processor Behavior," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Tanure, Soraya & Nabinger, Carlos & Becker, João Luiz, 2013. "Bioeconomic model of decision support system for farm management. Part I: Systemic conceptual modeling," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 104-116.
    9. Fraser, Rob & Monteiro, Diogo Souza, 2009. "A conceptual framework for evaluating the most cost-effective intervention along the supply chain to improve food safety," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 477-481, October.
    10. Starbird, S. Andrew & Amanor-Boadu, Vincent, 2006. "Do Inspection and Traceability Provide Incentives for Food Safety?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(1), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2002. "Costs And Risks Of Testing And Segregating Gm Wheat," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23480, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    12. Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2008. "The consequences of voluntary traceability system for supply chain relationships. An application of transaction cost economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 560-569, December.
    13. William W. Wilson & Bruce Dahl, 2006. "Costs and Risks of Segregating GM Wheat in Canada," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 54(3), pages 341-359, September.
    14. Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2002. "Costs And Risks Of Testing And Segregating Gm Wheat - Summary," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23502, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    15. Johnson, D. Demcey & Lin, William W., 2005. "The Economics of Testing for Biotech Grain: Application to StarLink Corn," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Houtian Ge & James Nolan & Richard Gray, 2015. "Identifying Strategies to Mitigate Handling Risks in the Canadian Grain Supply Chain," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(1), pages 101-128, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Esteso & M. M. E. Alemany & Fernando Ottati & Ángel Ortiz, 2023. "System dynamics model for improving the robustness of a fresh agri-food supply chain to disruptions," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1-53, June.
    2. Mehran Gharye Mirzaei & Saiedeh Gholami & Donya Rahmani, 2024. "A mathematical model for the optimization of agricultural supply chain under uncertain environmental and financial conditions: the case study of fresh date fruit," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20807-20840, August.
    3. Ágota Bányai & Tamás Bányai & Béla Illés, 2017. "Optimization of Consignment-Store-Based Supply Chain with Black Hole Algorithm," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, September.
    4. Zhong, Ling & Nie, Jiajia & Yue, Xiaohang & Jin, Minyue, 2023. "Optimal design of agricultural insurance subsidies under the risk of extreme weather," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    5. Zhou, Quan Spring & Olsen, Tava Lennon, 2018. "Rotating the medical supplies for emergency response: A simulation based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1-11.
    6. repec:ags:aaea22:335580 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh & Mohammad Reza Ghatreh Samani & Firoozeh Abbasi Saadi, 2021. "Strategic optimization of wheat supply chain network under uncertainty: a real case study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1487-1527, September.
    8. Houtian Ge & Patrick Canning & Stephan Goetz & Agnes Perez, 2018. "Effects of scale economies and production seasonality on optimal hub locations: the case of regional fresh produce aggregation," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(2), pages 157-169, March.
    9. De, Arijit & Mogale, D.G. & Zhang, Mengdi & Pratap, Saurabh & Kumar, Sri Krishna & Huang, George Q., 2020. "Multi-period multi-echelon inventory transportation problem considering stakeholders behavioural tendencies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Csilla Bartucz & László Buics & Edit Süle, 2023. "Lack of Collaboration on the CEP Market and the Underlying Reasons—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Guihua Wang & Quan Guo & Qiong Jiang & Butong Li, 2022. "A Study on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Supply Chain Profit Distribution in the Context of Common Prosperity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Rodrigues, Daniel & Teixeira, Rafael & Shockley, Jeff, 2019. "Inspection agency monitoring of food safety in an emerging economy: A multilevel analysis of Brazil's beef production industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Kingwell, Ross & Loxton, Ryan & Mardaneh, Elham, 2020. "Factors and scenarios affecting a farmer’s grain harvest logistics," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(2), April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ge, Houtian & Gray, Richard & Nolan, James, 2015. "Agricultural supply chain optimization and complexity: A comparison of analytic vs simulated solutions and policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 208-220.
    2. William, Wilson & Dahl, Bruce & Hertsgaard, David, 2020. "Soybean quality differentials, blending, testing and spatial arbitrage," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    3. Xiongyong Zhou & Madeleine Pullman & Zhiduan Xu, 2022. "The impact of food supply chain traceability on sustainability performance," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 93-115, June.
    4. Rouvière, Elodie, 2016. "Small is beautiful: firm size, prevention and food safety," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 12-22.
    5. Zhou, Xiongyong & Zhu, Qinghua & Xu, Zhiduan, 2023. "The role of contractual and relational governance for the success of digital traceability: Evidence from Chinese food producers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Rouviere, Elodie & Soubeyran, Raphael, 2012. "Small is Beautiful? Firm's Size, Prevention & Food Safety," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 123410, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Bulut, Harun & Lawrence, John D., 2007. "Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa," 2007 Conference, April 16-17, 2007, Chicago, Illinois 37576, NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    8. Soraya Tanure & Carlos Nabinger & João Luiz Becker, 2015. "Bioeconomic Model of Decision Support System for Farm Management: Proposal of a Mathematical Model," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 658-671, November.
    9. Prithviraj Lakkakula & David W. Bullock & William W. Wilson, 2022. "Asymmetric information and blockchains in soybean commodity markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 273-298, March.
    10. Wisner, Robert N., 2004. "Round-Up® Ready Spring Wheat: Its Potential Short-Term Impacts on U.S. Wheat Exports Markets and Prices," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12205, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Ng, Desmond W. & Salin, Victoria, 2012. "An Institutional Approach to the Examination of Food Safety," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, May.
    12. David J. Hertsgaard & William W. Wilson & Bruce Dahl, 2019. "Costs and risks of testing and blending for essential amino acids in soybeans," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 265-280, April.
    13. Souza Monteiro, Diogo M. & Caswell, Julie A., 2008. "Optimal choice of Voluntary traceability as a food risk management tool," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44394, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Mark R. Powell, 2014. "Optimal Food Safety Sampling Under a Budget Constraint," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 93-100, January.
    15. Zhu, Manhong & Schmitz, Andrew & Schmtiz, Troy G., 2016. "Why Has not Genetically Modified Wheat Been Commercialized: A Game Theoretical Perspective," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230796, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Li, Kai & Zhou, Jie-hong & Liang, Qiao & Huang, Zuhui, 2015. "Food safety controls and governance structure varieties in China's vegetable and fruit sector," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212046, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Cristina Grazia & Abdelhakim Hammoudi & Oualid Hamza, 2012. "Sanitary and phytosanitary standards: Does consumers’ health protection justify developing countries’ producers’ exclusion? [Standards sanitaires et phytosanitaires : la protection de la santé des ," Post-Print hal-02642925, HAL.
    18. Cristina Grazia & Abdelhakim Hammoudi & Oualid Hamza, 2012. "Sanitary and phytosanitary standards: Does consumers’ health protection justify developing countries’ producers’ exclusion?," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 93(2), pages 145-170.
    19. Huffman, Wallace E. & Shogren, Jason F. & Rousu, Matthew C. & Tegene, Abebayehu, 2003. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Food Labels in a Market with Diverse Information: Evidence from Experimental Auctions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Saak, Alexander E., 2016. "Traceability and reputation in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 149-162.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:179:y:2016:i:c:p:228-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.