IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v156y2014icp124-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yield and allocation management in a continuous make-to-stock system with demand upgrade substitution

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Guanghua
  • Dong, Ming
  • Liu, Shaoxuan

Abstract

Yield management is crucial for high-tech industries to reduce over-production. However, it is very challenging for a manufacturer to make a yield decision under the circumstance of uncertain demand and stochastic product quality. For example, in semiconductor manufacturing industry, products are produced in batches within certain production cycle time. Even if the same raw material is put into the production system, the product qualities (measured by performance) usually are not identical due to random yield in the manufacturing process. Since products have overlapped performance specifications, products of the same batch are classified into different classes according to their qualities at the allocation stage. Products with higher performance can substitute for demand for products with lower performance. This type of production and allocation system can be specified as a make-to-stock system with single material, multi-products, multi-periods, upward demand substitution under random yield and uncertain demands. In order to maximize profit, the manufacturer needs to decide on the optimal input material quantity and the optimal allocation policy. The problem is formulated as a stochastic dynamic programming model. Because manufacturer׳s profit is affected by the allocation policies, ATP-r allocation policy is proposed to help manufacturer make real time allocation decisions. A numerical experiment shows that ATP-r allocation policy performs better than the traditional Myopic allocation policy. To reduce the computation burden involved in ATP-r allocation policy, we further propose a simplified algorithm and our experimental studies provide proof of the effectiveness of the proposed simple algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Guanghua & Dong, Ming & Liu, Shaoxuan, 2014. "Yield and allocation management in a continuous make-to-stock system with demand upgrade substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 124-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:156:y:2014:i:c:p:124-131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527314001765
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mart, Turgut & Duran, Serhan & Bakal, İsmail Serdar, 2013. "Tactical inventory and backorder decisions for systems with predictable production yield," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 294-303.
    2. Tan, Baris & Karabati, Selcuk, 2013. "Retail inventory management with stock-out based dynamic demand substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 78-87.
    3. Arthur Hsu & Yehuda Bassok, 1999. "Random Yield and Random Demand in a Production System with Downward Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 277-290, April.
    4. Sayın, F. & Karaesmen, F. & Özekici, S., 2014. "Newsvendor model with random supply and financial hedging: Utility-based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 178-189.
    5. Gabriel R. Bitran & Thin-Yin Leong, 1992. "Deterministic Approximations to Co-Production Problems with Service Constraints and Random Yields," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 724-742, May.
    6. Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Ait-Kadi, Daoud & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2010. "Robust production planning in a manufacturing environment with random yield: A case in sawmill production planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 882-891, March.
    7. Donald M. Topkis, 1968. "Optimal Ordering and Rationing Policies in a Nonstationary Dynamic Inventory Model with n Demand Classes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 160-176, November.
    8. Stavrulaki, Euthemia, 2011. "Inventory decisions for substitutable products with stock-dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 65-78, January.
    9. Cheaitou, Ali & van Delft, Christian, 2013. "Finite horizon stochastic inventory problem with dual sourcing: Near myopic and heuristics bounds," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 371-378.
    10. Liu, Wei & Song, Shiji & Wu, Cheng, 2013. "Impact of loss aversion on the newsvendor game with product substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 352-359.
    11. Gabriel R. Bitran & Stephen M. Gilbert, 1994. "Co-Production Processes with Random Yields in the Semiconductor Industry," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 476-491, June.
    12. Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2014. "Batch scheduling with a rate-modifying maintenance activity to minimize total flowtime," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 238-242.
    13. Tsai, Kune-muh & Wang, Shan-chi, 2009. "Multi-site available-to-promise modeling for assemble-to-order manufacturing: An illustration on TFT-LCD manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 174-184, January.
    14. Edward Ignall & Arthur F. Veinott, Jr., 1969. "Optimality of Myopic Inventory Policies for Several Substitute Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 284-304, January.
    15. Xiong, Mohua & Tor, Shu Beng & Khoo, Li Pheng & Chen, Chun-Hsien, 2003. "A web-enhanced dynamic BOM-based available-to-promise system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 133-147, May.
    16. Katia C. Frank & Rachel Q. Zhang & Izak Duenyas, 2003. "Optimal Policies for Inventory Systems with Priority Demand Classes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 993-1002, December.
    17. Long Gao & Susan H. Xu & Michael O. Ball, 2012. "Managing an Available-to-Promise Assembly System with Dynamic Short-Term Pseudo-Order Forecast," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(4), pages 770-790, April.
    18. As'ad, Rami & Demirli, Kudret, 2010. "Production scheduling in steel rolling mills with demand substitution: Rolling horizon implementation and approximations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 361-369, August.
    19. Cetinkaya, S. & Parlar, M., 1998. "Optimal myopic policy for a stochastic inventory problem with fixed and proportional backorder costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 20-41, October.
    20. G. R. Bitran & S. Dasu, 1992. "Ordering Policies in an environment of Stochastic Yields and Substitutable Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 999-1017, October.
    21. Chen-Ritzo, Ching-Hua & Ervolina, Tom & Harrison, Terry P. & Gupta, Barun, 2011. "Component rationing for available-to-promise scheduling in configure-to-order systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 57-65, May.
    22. Pan, Kewen & Lai, K.K. & Liang, L. & Leung, Stephen C.H., 2009. "Two-period pricing and ordering policy for the dominant retailer in a two-echelon supply chain with demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 919-929, August.
    23. Ali Cheaitou & Christian van Delft, 2013. "Finite horizon stochastic inventory problem with dual sourcing: Near myopic and heuristics bounds," Post-Print hal-00989433, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rezaei Somarin, Aghil & Chen, Songlin & Asian, Sobhan & Wang, David Z.W., 2017. "A heuristic stock allocation rule for repairable service parts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 131-140.
    2. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lai, Hsing-Hua, 2017. "Capacity allocation with differentiated product demands under dual sourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 757-769.
    3. Lu, Fen & Xu, He & Chen, Pengyu & Zhu, Stuart X., 2018. "Joint pricing and production decisions with yield uncertainty and downconversion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 52-62.
    4. Simon Thevenin & Yossiri Adulyasak & Jean-François Cordeau, 2022. "Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming for Multiechelon Lot Sizing with Component Substitution," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3151-3169, November.
    5. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lai, Hsing-Hua, 2020. "Pricing and ordering decisions in a supply chain with downward substitution and imperfect process yield," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shin, Hojung & Park, Soohoon & Lee, Euncheol & Benton, W.C., 2015. "A classification of the literature on the planning of substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 686-699.
    2. Tao Lu & Ying‐Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2019. "Selling Co‐Products through a Distributor: The Impact on Product Line Design," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 1010-1032, April.
    3. Ng, Tsan Sheng, 2013. "Robust regret for uncertain linear programs with application to co-production models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 483-493.
    4. Lu, Fen & Xu, He & Chen, Pengyu & Zhu, Stuart X., 2018. "Joint pricing and production decisions with yield uncertainty and downconversion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 52-62.
    5. Lee, Deishin & Tongarlak, Mustafa Hayri, 2017. "Converting retail food waste into by-product," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 944-956.
    6. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2008. "Pricing and Operational Recourse in Coproduction Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 522-537, March.
    7. Ying-Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2013. "Coproduct Technologies: Product Line Design and Process Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(12), pages 2772-2789, December.
    8. Deishin Lee, 2012. "Turning Waste into By-Product," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 115-127, January.
    9. Roni, Mohammad S. & Jin, Mingzhou & Eksioglu, Sandra D., 2015. "A hybrid inventory management system responding to regular demand and surge demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 190-200.
    10. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Joseph Geunes, 2000. "Requirements Planning with Substitutions: Exploiting Bill-of-Materials Flexibility in Production Planning," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 166-185, January.
    11. Vidal-Carreras, Pilar I. & Garcia-Sabater, Jose P. & Coronado-Hernandez, Jairo R., 2012. "Economic lot scheduling with deliberated and controlled coproduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 396-404.
    12. Ye, Taofeng, 2014. "Inventory management with simultaneously horizontal and vertical substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 316-324.
    13. He, Shuang & Zhang, Jian & Zhang, Juliang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Production/inventory competition between firms with fixed-proportions co-production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 497-509.
    14. Itir Karaesmen & Garrett van Ryzin, 2004. "Overbooking with Substitutable Inventory Classes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 83-104, February.
    15. Tim Noparumpa & Burak Kazaz & Scott Webster, 2015. "Wine Futures and Advance Selling Under Quality Uncertainty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 411-426, July.
    16. Lingxiu Dong & Panos Kouvelis & Xiaole Wu, 2014. "The Value of Operational Flexibility in the Presence of Input and Output Price Uncertainties with Oil Refining Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2908-2926, December.
    17. Mou, Shandong & Robb, David J. & DeHoratius, Nicole, 2018. "Retail store operations: Literature review and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 399-422.
    18. Roni, Mohammad S. & Eksioglu, Sandra D. & Jin, Mingzhou & Mamun, Saleh, 2016. "A hybrid inventory policy with split delivery under regular and surge demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 126-136.
    19. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lai, Hsing-Hua, 2020. "Pricing and ordering decisions in a supply chain with downward substitution and imperfect process yield," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    20. Jin, Minyue & Li, Baoyong & Xiong, Yu & Chakraborty, Ratula & Zhou, Yu, 2023. "Implications of coproduction technology on waste management: Who can benefit from the coproduct made of leftover materials?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1248-1259.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:156:y:2014:i:c:p:124-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.