IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v121y2009i1p57-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Particle swarm optimization: A study of particle displacement for solving continuous and combinatorial optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Kemmoé Tchomté, Sylverin
  • Gourgand, Michel

Abstract

This article addresses the particle swarm optimization (PSO) method. It is a recent proposed algorithm by Kennedy and Eberhart [1995. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (Perth, Australia), vol. IV, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1942-1948]. This optimization method is motivated by social behaviour of organisms such as bird flocking and fish schooling. PSO algorithm is not only a tool for optimization, but also a tool for representing socio-cognition of human and artificial agents, based on principles of social behaviour. Some scientists suggest that knowledge is optimized by social interaction and thinking is not only private but also interpersonal. PSO as an optimization tool, provides a population-based search procedure in which individuals called particles change their position (state) with time. In a PSO system, particles fly in a multidimensional search space. During flight, each particle adjusts its position according to its own experience, and according to the experience of neighbours, making use of the best position encountered by itself and its neighbours. In this paper, we propose firstly, an extension of the PSO system that integrates a new displacement of the particles (the balance between the intensification process and the diversification process) and we highlight a relation between the coefficients of update of each dimension velocity between the classical PSO algorithm and the extension. Secondly, we propose an adaptation of this extension of PSO algorithm to solve combinatorial optimization problem with precedence constraints in general and resource-constrained project scheduling problem in particular. The numerical experiments are done on the main continuous functions and on the resource-constrained project scheduling problem (RCPSP) instances provided by the psplib. The results obtained are encouraging and push us into accepting than both PSO algorithm and extensions proposed based on the new particles displacement are a promising direction for research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kemmoé Tchomté, Sylverin & Gourgand, Michel, 2009. "Particle swarm optimization: A study of particle displacement for solving continuous and combinatorial optimization problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 57-67, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:1:p:57-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(09)00104-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wong, W.K. & Leung, S.Y.S., 2008. "Genetic optimization of fabric utilization in apparel manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 376-387, July.
    2. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    3. J. Alcaraz & C. Maroto, 2001. "A Robust Genetic Algorithm for Resource Allocation in Project Scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 83-109, February.
    4. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    5. Liu, Shixin & Tang, Jiafu & Song, Jianhai, 2006. "Order-planning model and algorithm for manufacturing steel sheets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 30-43, March.
    6. Valls, Vicente & Ballestin, Francisco & Quintanilla, Sacramento, 2005. "Justification and RCPSP: A technique that pays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 375-386, September.
    7. Bouleimen, K. & Lecocq, H., 2003. "A new efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem and its multiple mode version," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 268-281, September.
    8. Pilar Tormos & Antonio Lova, 2001. "A Competitive Heuristic Solution Technique for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 65-81, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zühal Kartal & Mohan Krishnamoorthy & Andreas T. Ernst, 2019. "Heuristic algorithms for the single allocation p-hub center problem with routing considerations," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 99-145, March.
    2. Dongmin Wang & Xiangnan Liu, 2018. "Comparative Analysis of GF-1 and HJ-1 Data to Derive the Optimal Scale for Monitoring Heavy Metal Stress in Rice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Xiuhong Li & Chongxiang Sun & Huilong Fan & Jiale Yang, 2024. "Remote-Sensing Satellite Mission Scheduling Optimisation Method under Dynamic Mission Priorities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Albert Corominas & Alberto García-Villoria & Rafael Pastor, 2013. "Metaheuristic algorithms hybridised with variable neighbourhood search for solving the response time variability problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 296-312, July.
    5. Nearchou, Andreas C., 2011. "Maximizing production rate and workload smoothing in assembly lines using particle swarm optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 242-250, February.
    6. Mirko M. Stojiljković & Mladen M. Stojiljković & Bratislav D. Blagojević, 2014. "Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization of Trigeneration Plants Based on Metaheuristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dieter Debels & Mario Vanhoucke, 2007. "A Decomposition-Based Genetic Algorithm for the Resource-Constrained Project-Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 457-469, June.
    2. Moumene, Khaled & Ferland, Jacques A., 2009. "Activity list representation for a generalization of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 46-54, November.
    3. Valls, Vicente & Ballestin, Francisco & Quintanilla, Sacramento, 2008. "A hybrid genetic algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 495-508, March.
    4. Peteghem, Vincent Van & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 409-418, March.
    5. Kolisch, Rainer & Hartmann, Sonke, 2006. "Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: An update," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 23-37, October.
    6. D. Debels & M. Vanhoucke, 2005. "A Decomposition-Based Heuristic For The Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/293, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Tseng, Lin-Yu & Chen, Shih-Chieh, 2006. "A hybrid metaheuristic for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 707-721, December.
    8. Debels, Dieter & De Reyck, Bert & Leus, Roel & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2006. "A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 638-653, March.
    9. Colvin, Matthew & Maravelias, Christos T., 2011. "R&D pipeline management: Task interdependencies and risk management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 616-628, December.
    10. Van Peteghem, Vincent & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2014. "An experimental investigation of metaheuristics for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem on new dataset instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 62-72.
    11. Lova, Antonio & Tormos, Pilar & Cervantes, Mariamar & Barber, Federico, 2009. "An efficient hybrid genetic algorithm for scheduling projects with resource constraints and multiple execution modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 302-316, February.
    12. Valls, Vicente & Ballestin, Francisco & Quintanilla, Sacramento, 2005. "Justification and RCPSP: A technique that pays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 375-386, September.
    13. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    14. Coelho, José & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2011. "Multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling using RCPSP and SAT solvers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 73-82, August.
    15. André Schnabel & Carolin Kellenbrink & Stefan Helber, 2018. "Profit-oriented scheduling of resource-constrained projects with flexible capacity constraints," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(2), pages 329-356, September.
    16. Sepehr Proon & Mingzhou Jin, 2011. "A genetic algorithm with neighborhood search for the resource‐constrained project scheduling problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(2), pages 73-82, March.
    17. Chen, Jiaqiong & Askin, Ronald G., 2009. "Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 23-34, February.
    18. Zamani, Reza, 2013. "A competitive magnet-based genetic algorithm for solving the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 552-559.
    19. Ranjbar, Mohammad & De Reyck, Bert & Kianfar, Fereydoon, 2009. "A hybrid scatter search for the discrete time/resource trade-off problem in project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 35-48, February.
    20. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:1:p:57-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.