IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v121y2009i1p112-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of 4PL operating models: A decision making approach based on 2-additive Choquet integral

Author

Listed:
  • Büyüközkan, Gülçin
  • Feyzioglu, Orhan
  • Sakir Ersoy, Mehmet

Abstract

By being a supply chain integrator who can assemble and manage the resources, capabilities, and technology of its own organization with those of complementary service providers, fourth party logistics (4PL) providers deliver comprehensive supply chain solutions and form an important option for business outsourcing. The adequate design of the partnership between companies in this type of outsourcing activities is essential. In order to support the effective usage of 4PL services, this paper proposes an analytical multiple criteria decision making approach to evaluate 4PL operating models. While decision criteria and their hierarchy were identified, it is observed that there exist interactions, e.g. simultaneous satisfaction of two or criteria is sometimes required. This situation can not be handled with traditional multi-criteria decision making methods which assume criteria independence. 2-additive Choquet integral is appropriate to model criteria interactions by pairs and is used in this study. The proposed framework is applied for a logistics company willing to expand its operations. Finally, an application is provided to demonstrate the potential of the methodology for 4PL operating model selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Feyzioglu, Orhan & Sakir Ersoy, Mehmet, 2009. "Evaluation of 4PL operating models: A decision making approach based on 2-additive Choquet integral," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 112-120, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:1:p:112-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(09)00110-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marichal, Jean-Luc & Roubens, Marc, 2000. "Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 641-650, August.
    2. Swafford, Patricia M. & Ghosh, Soumen & Murthy, Nagesh, 2008. "Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 288-297, December.
    3. Jharkharia, Sanjay & Shankar, Ravi, 2007. "Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 274-289, June.
    4. Cruijssen, Frans & Cools, Martine & Dullaert, Wout, 2007. "Horizontal cooperation in logistics: Opportunities and impediments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 129-142, March.
    5. Huang, Samuel H. & Keskar, Harshal, 2007. "Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 510-523, February.
    6. Cliville, Vincent & Berrah, Lamia & Mauris, Gilles, 2007. "Quantitative expression and aggregation of performance measurements based on the MACBETH multi-criteria method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 171-189, January.
    7. Krakovics, Fabio & Eugenio Leal, José & Mendes Jr., Paulo & Lorenzo Santos, Rafael, 2008. "Defining and calibrating performance indicators of a 4PL in the chemical industry in Brazil," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 502-514, October.
    8. Marasco, Alessandra, 2008. "Third-party logistics: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 127-147, May.
    9. Berrah, L. & Mauris, G. & Montmain, J., 2008. "Monitoring the improvement of an overall industrial performance based on a Choquet integral aggregation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 340-351, June.
    10. Barad, M. & Even Sapir, D., 2003. "Flexibility in logistic systems--modeling and performance evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 155-170, August.
    11. Grabisch, Michel, 1996. "The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 445-456, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hans-Joachim Schramm & Carolin Nicole Czaja & Michael Dittrich & Matthias Mentschel, 2019. "Current Advancements of and Future Developments for Fourth Party Logistics in a Digital Future," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Feng, Bo & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Li, Yanzhi, 2011. "A decision method for supplier selection in multi-service outsourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 240-250, August.
    3. Jili Kong & Ziyu Chen & Xiaoping Liu, 2022. "A Review of Logistics Pricing Research Based on Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Vukašin Pajić & Milorad Kilibarda & Milan Andrejić, 2023. "A Novel Hybrid Approach for Evaluation of Resilient 4PL Provider for E-Commerce," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, January.
    5. YU, Jie & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Ning, Kun & Edwards, David, 2015. "Product delivery service provider selection and customer satisfaction in the era of internet of things: A Chinese e-retailers’ perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 104-116.
    6. Maria Vodenicharova, 2016. "Application of Quality Management Systems in the Logistics Sector in Bulgaria," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 515-528, December.
    7. Valerio Elia & Maria Grazia Gnoni & Fabiana Tornese, 2024. "On-Demand Warehousing Platforms: Evolution and Trend Analysis of an Industrial Sharing Economy Model," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Luping & Zhou, Peng & Zhou, Dequn, 2015. "A non-additive multiple criteria analysis method for evaluation of airline service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 154-161.
    9. Aydin, Nezir & Celik, Erkan & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2015. "A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 61-81.
    10. Meimei Xia & Jian Chen & Xiao-Jun Zeng, 2018. "Decision Analysis on Choquet Integral-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Imprecise Information," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 677-704, March.
    11. Xiqin Wen & Mingchao Yan & Jieyu Xian & Rui Yue & Anhua Peng, 2016. "Supplier selection in supplier chain management using Choquet integral-based linguistic operators under fuzzy heterogeneous environment," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 307-330, September.
    12. Meimei Xia & Zeshui Xu & Na Chen, 2013. "Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 259-279, March.
    13. Xiaohu Qian & Min Huang & Qingyu Zhang & Mingqiang Yin & Xingwei Wang, 2018. "Mechanism design of incentive-based reverse auctions with loss-averse 3PLs under incomplete attributes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Cherneva, Denitsa & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2015. "Outsourcing to 4PLs – Opportunities, Challenges, Future Outlook," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 20, pages 231-255, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    15. Friedrich, Anne & Lange, Anne & Elbert, Ralf, 2022. "How additive manufacturing drives business model change: The perspective of logistics service providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    16. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2015. "A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 76-92.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2011. "Assessing performance factors for a 3PL in a value chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 441-452, June.
    2. Mayag, Brice & Bouyssou, Denis, 2020. "Necessary and possible interaction between criteria in a 2-additive Choquet integral model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 308-320.
    3. Angilella, Silvia & Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto, 2010. "Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 277-288, February.
    4. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2010. "A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 247-286, March.
    5. Silvia Bortot & Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira, 2011. "Inconsistency and non-additive Choquet integration in the Analytic Hierarchy Process," DISA Working Papers 2011/06, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 29 Jul 2011.
    6. Silvia Bortot & Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira & Anastasia Stamatopoulou, 2020. "Shapley and superShapley aggregation emerging from consensus dynamics in the multicriteria Choquet framework," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 583-611, December.
    7. Bottero, M. & Ferretti, V. & Figueira, J.R. & Greco, S. & Roy, B., 2018. "On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 120-140.
    8. Belieres, Simon & Hewitt, Mike & Jozefowiez, Nicolas & Semet, Frédéric, 2021. "A time-expanded network reduction matheuristic for the logistics service network design problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    9. Brice Mayag & Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2011. "A representation of preferences by the Choquet integral with respect to a 2-additive capacity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 297-324, September.
    10. Berrah, L. & Mauris, G. & Montmain, J., 2008. "Monitoring the improvement of an overall industrial performance based on a Choquet integral aggregation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 340-351, June.
    11. Wang, Chun-Hsien & Lu, Iuan-Yuan & Chen, Chin-Bein, 2010. "Integrating hierarchical balanced scorecard with non-additive fuzzy integral for evaluating high technology firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 413-426, November.
    12. Xiaoyang Yao & Enmeng Liu & Xiaolei Sun & Wei Le & Jianping Li, 2024. "Integrating external representations and internal patterns into dynamic multiple-criteria decision making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(1), pages 149-172, October.
    13. Erik Hofmann & Florin Osterwalder, 2017. "Third-Party Logistics Providers in the Digital Age: Towards a New Competitive Arena?," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-28, November.
    14. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2016. "Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 2-18.
    15. Yeung, Kwong & Zhou, Honggeng & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2012. "The impact of third-party logistics providers' capabilities on exporters' performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 741-753.
    16. Pelegrina, Guilherme Dean & Duarte, Leonardo Tomazeli & Grabisch, Michel & Romano, João Marcos Travassos, 2020. "The multilinear model in multicriteria decision making: The case of 2-additive capacities and contributions to parameter identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 945-956.
    17. Paul Alain Kaldjob Kaldjob & Brice Mayag & Denis Bouyssou, 2023. "On the interpretation of the interaction index between criteria in a Choquet integral model," Post-Print hal-03766372, HAL.
    18. Cruciani, Caterina & Giove, Silvio & Pinar, Mehmet & Sostero, Matteo, 2012. "Constructing the FEEM Sustainability Index: A Choquet-Integral Application," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 130550, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    19. Bayraktar, Erkan & Demirbag, Mehmet & Koh, S.C. Lenny & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Zaim, Halil, 2009. "A causal analysis of the impact of information systems and supply chain management practices on operational performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs in Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 133-149, November.
    20. Abastante, Francesca & Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Lami, Isabella M., 2018. "Choice architecture for architecture choices: Evaluating social housing initiatives putting together a parsimonious AHP methodology and the Choquet integral," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 748-762.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:1:p:112-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.