IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v8y2024i4p93-d1484890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On-Demand Warehousing Platforms: Evolution and Trend Analysis of an Industrial Sharing Economy Model

Author

Listed:
  • Valerio Elia

    (Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Campus Ecotekne, Via per Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Maria Grazia Gnoni

    (Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Campus Ecotekne, Via per Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Fabiana Tornese

    (Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Campus Ecotekne, Via per Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

Abstract

Background : The on-demand warehousing (ODW) model is emerging as a platform-enabled logistics solution based on resource sharing for businesses needing storage space. It is based on a business-to-business marketplace where companies can provide (or request) storage services with an elevated level of flexibility. The literature focusing on this topic is still scarce, and while the potential advantages of such a model seem quite clear, challenges and criticalities need to be further explored. Methods : Starting from a state-of-the-art analysis of ODW, a two-step methodology was adopted: first, a SWOT analysis was conducted to help summarize the challenges related to this emerging model. Then, an exploratory analysis of multiple case studies was employed to provide a first discussion on the advantages and criticalities of this model, highlighting its latest evolution. Results : The ODW model is still evolving, as several former pure ODW platforms have been changing their business model to become on-demand 4PLs (defined as “mixed ODW-4PLs”), adapting their core activities to manage the criticalities of on-demand services. Conclusions : This study represents the first attempt to investigate benefits and criticalities of ODW models, outlining the latest trend of ODW and identifying two distinct types of ODW model currently present on the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerio Elia & Maria Grazia Gnoni & Fabiana Tornese, 2024. "On-Demand Warehousing Platforms: Evolution and Trend Analysis of an Industrial Sharing Economy Model," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:93-:d:1484890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/4/93/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/4/93/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:mrn000:01409170210782990 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Van der Heide, G. & Buijs, P. & Roodbergen, K.J. & Vis, I.F.A., 2018. "Dynamic shipments of inventories in shared warehouse and transportation networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 240-257.
    3. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Feyzioglu, Orhan & Sakir Ersoy, Mehmet, 2009. "Evaluation of 4PL operating models: A decision making approach based on 2-additive Choquet integral," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 112-120, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leogrande, Angelo, 2024. "Strategie innovative per la logistica: il valore del kitting e assembly nel settore idrotermosanitario," MPRA Paper 122746, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans-Joachim Schramm & Carolin Nicole Czaja & Michael Dittrich & Matthias Mentschel, 2019. "Current Advancements of and Future Developments for Fourth Party Logistics in a Digital Future," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Alavi Fard, Farzad & Sy, Malick & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2019. "Optimal overbooking strategies in the airlines using dynamic programming approach in continuous time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 384-399.
    3. Asadi, Amin & Nurre Pinkley, Sarah, 2021. "A stochastic scheduling, allocation, and inventory replenishment problem for battery swap stations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    4. Meimei Xia & Zeshui Xu & Na Chen, 2013. "Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 259-279, March.
    5. Afaf Haial & Loubna Benabbou & Abdelaziz Berrado, 2021. "Designing a Transportation-Strategy Decision-Making Process for a Supply Chain: Case of a Pharmaceutical Supply Chain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-29, February.
    6. Xiaohu Qian & Min Huang & Qingyu Zhang & Mingqiang Yin & Xingwei Wang, 2018. "Mechanism design of incentive-based reverse auctions with loss-averse 3PLs under incomplete attributes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Cherneva, Denitsa & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2015. "Outsourcing to 4PLs – Opportunities, Challenges, Future Outlook," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 20, pages 231-255, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    8. Vukašin Pajić & Milorad Kilibarda & Milan Andrejić, 2023. "A Novel Hybrid Approach for Evaluation of Resilient 4PL Provider for E-Commerce," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Luping & Zhou, Peng & Zhou, Dequn, 2015. "A non-additive multiple criteria analysis method for evaluation of airline service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 154-161.
    10. Kidd, Martin P. & Darvish, Maryam & Coelho, Leandro C. & Gendron, Bernard, 2024. "A relax-and-restrict matheuristic for supply chain network design with facility location and customer due date flexibility," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Maria Vodenicharova, 2016. "Application of Quality Management Systems in the Logistics Sector in Bulgaria," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 515-528, December.
    12. Aydin, Nezir & Celik, Erkan & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2015. "A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 61-81.
    13. Fatima Ezzahra Achamrah & Fouad Riane & Evren Sahin & Sabine Limbourg, 2022. "An Artificial-Immune-System-Based Algorithm Enhanced with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Solving Returnable Transport Item Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-29, May.
    14. Ting Qu & Tianxiang Huang & Duxian Nie & Yelin Fu & Lin Ma & George Q. Huang, 2022. "Joint Decisions of Inventory Optimization and Order Allocation for Omni-Channel Multi-Echelon Distribution Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Meimei Xia & Jian Chen & Xiao-Jun Zeng, 2018. "Decision Analysis on Choquet Integral-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Imprecise Information," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 677-704, March.
    16. Xiqin Wen & Mingchao Yan & Jieyu Xian & Rui Yue & Anhua Peng, 2016. "Supplier selection in supplier chain management using Choquet integral-based linguistic operators under fuzzy heterogeneous environment," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 307-330, September.
    17. Darvish, Maryam & Archetti, Claudia & Coelho, Leandro C. & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2019. "Flexible two-echelon location routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1124-1136.
    18. Friedrich, Anne & Lange, Anne & Elbert, Ralf, 2022. "How additive manufacturing drives business model change: The perspective of logistics service providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    19. Feng, Bo & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Li, Yanzhi, 2011. "A decision method for supplier selection in multi-service outsourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 240-250, August.
    20. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2015. "A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 76-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:93-:d:1484890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.