IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v607y2022ics0378437122007889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of general unit hydrograph model for marathon finish time distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Junke
  • Mohebbi, Amin
  • Zhang, Tian C.

Abstract

The marathon finish time distribution is the probability distribution of the time a group of runners completes a marathon race. The knowledge of this distribution is required to optimize a running process when planning and operating a marathon; it is also required to compare different marathons and evaluate individual running performance. This research demonstrated that the marathon finish time distribution can be described by the general unit hydrograph model from applied hydrology. Specifically, we found that marathon finish time data, in terms of distribution density, often show a positively skewed distribution, which implies that a few runners are superfast, many runners are very slow, and most runners are between the two extremes. This asymmetrical feature is similar to a unit hydrograph that describes rainfall-runoff processes in watersheds. We thus hypothesized that the marathon finish time distribution follows Guo’s three-parameter general unit hydrograph model. To test this hypothesis, we fit the general unit hydrograph model to the 2013–2021 New York City (NYC) Marathon finish time distribution data, resulting in determination coefficients r2≥0.9997. We next validated the proposed model with the world marathon database including 35 million results in 2000–2021 from more than 28,000 long-distance foot races, which was then compared with the NYC marathon data. According to the two inflection times of the finish time density function (asymmetrical bell curve) of the world marathons, we classified all marathoners into three categories: super runners who finish before the left inflection time; endurable runners who finish after the right inflection time; and fast runners who finish between the two inflection times. Finally, we compared the general unit hydrograph model and two typical asymmetrical distribution functions with the world marathon data and found that the proposed model describes the data better.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Junke & Mohebbi, Amin & Zhang, Tian C., 2022. "Application of general unit hydrograph model for marathon finish time distributions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:607:y:2022:i:c:s0378437122007889
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.128230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437122007889
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2022.128230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodriguez, E. & Espinosa-Paredes, G. & Alvarez-Ramirez, J., 2014. "Convection–diffusion effects in marathon race dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 498-507.
    2. Lin, Zhenquan & Meng, Fan, 2018. "Empirical analysis on the runners’ velocity distribution in city marathons," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 533-541.
    3. Billat, Véronique & Carbillet, Thomas & Correa, Matthieu & Pycke, Jean-Renaud, 2019. "Detecting the marathon asymmetry with a statistical signature," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 240-247.
    4. Kwong, Hok Shing & Nadarajah, Saralees, 2019. "Modelling dynamics of marathons – A mixture model approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    5. Eric J. Allen & Patricia M. Dechow & Devin G. Pope & George Wu, 2017. "Reference-Dependent Preferences: Evidence from Marathon Runners," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1657-1672, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gündüz, Güngör & Kuzucuoğlu, Mahmut & Gündüz, Yalın, 2022. "Entropic characterization of Gross Domestic Product per capita (GDP) values of countries," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    2. Kwong, Hok Shing & Nadarajah, Saralees, 2019. "Modelling dynamics of marathons – A mixture model approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    3. Joshua Goodman & Oded Gurantz & Jonathan Smith, 2020. "Take Two! SAT Retaking and College Enrollment Gaps," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 115-158, May.
    4. Mariya Burdina & Scott Hiller, 2021. "When Falling Just Short is a Good Thing: The Effect of Past Performance on Improvement," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 22(7), pages 777-798, October.
    5. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2022. "On the axiomatic approach to sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(2), pages 321-347, February.
    6. Stefano Della & Jörg Heining & Johannes F Schmieder & Simon Trenkle, 2023. "Evidence on Job Search Models from a Survey of Unemployed Workers in Germany," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(2), pages 1181-1232.
    7. Meng, Charlotte C., 2023. "The price paid: Heuristic thinking and biased reference points in the housing market," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Phillip J. Quinn, 2018. "Shifting corporate culture: executive stock ownership plan adoptions and incentives to meet or just beat analysts’ expectations," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 654-685, June.
    9. Kovács, Balázs & Lehman, David W. & Carroll, Glenn R., 2020. "Grade inflation in restaurant hygiene inspections: Repeated interactions between inspectors and restaurateurs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. Aurélien Baillon & Han Bleichrodt & Vitalie Spinu, 2020. "Searching for the Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 93-112, January.
    11. Marinho Bertanha & Andrew H. McCallum & Alexis Payne & Nathan Seegert, 2022. "Bunching estimation of elasticities using Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 22(3), pages 597-624, September.
    12. González-Jiménez, Víctor, 2024. "Incentive design for reference-dependent preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 493-518.
    13. Stefano DellaVigna & Attila Lindner & Balázs Reizer & Johannes F. Schmieder, 2017. "Reference-Dependent Job Search: Evidence from Hungary," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1969-2018.
    14. Park, Hyeon, 2023. "A general equilibrium model of dynamic loss aversion," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    15. Bertanha, Marinho & McCallum, Andrew H. & Seegert, Nathan, 2023. "Better bunching, nicer notching," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    16. Guo, Feiyu & Cao, Erbao, 2021. "Can reference points explain vaccine hesitancy? A new perspective on their formation and updating," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Evan Weingarten & Sudeep Bhatia & Barbara Mellers, 2019. "Multiple Goals as Reference Points: One Failure Makes Everything Else Feel Worse," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3337-3352, July.
    18. Qi Ge & Ignacio Sarmiento Barbieri & Rodrigo Schneider, 2021. "Sporting Events, Emotional Cues, And Crime: Spatial And Temporal Evidence From Brazilian Soccer Games," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 59(1), pages 375-395, January.
    19. Bouke Klein Teeselink & Martijn J. van den Assem & Dennie van Dolder, 2023. "Does Losing Lead to Winning? An Empirical Analysis for Four Sports," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 513-532, January.
    20. Koch, Alexander K. & Nafziger, Julia, 2021. "Motivational goal bracketing with non-rational goals," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:607:y:2022:i:c:s0378437122007889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.