IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v426y2015icp16-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of persuasion power on the consensus formation

Author

Listed:
  • Gündüç, Semra
  • Eryiğit, Recep

Abstract

An opinion dynamics model which is based on a version of two dimensional Sznajd model is introduced. According to this model the dynamics is governed by the interactions between four agents which live on the corners of a plaquette and their neighbors. The distinctive feature of the model is that each individual is identified by two parameters, namely, opinion and persuasion ability. The united group may persuade the individuals living at the neighboring sites according to both the number and their persuasion ability. This form of the model is used to discuss opinion dynamics processes in societies where a campaign is conducted by the principle being united and putting forward arguments which are commonly accepted by the members of the society. It is seen that persuasion parameter plays the major role in the societies where a minority opinion gains ground to be the major opinion of the society. The model has been applied to the Scottish referendum opinion poles data since 2011. The model in its simplicity, predicts that the arguments of the minority opinion (“YES” votes) are more appealing despite the observed win of the “NO” votes. This result may be due to the abundance of the “NO” opinion supporters at the beginning of the campaign.

Suggested Citation

  • Gündüç, Semra & Eryiğit, Recep, 2015. "The role of persuasion power on the consensus formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 426(C), pages 16-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:426:y:2015:i:c:p:16-24
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.01.040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437115000424
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2015.01.040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guillaume Deffuant & Frederic Amblard & Gérard Weisbuch, 2002. "How Can Extremism Prevail? a Study Based on the Relative Agreement Interaction Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5(4), pages 1-1.
    2. Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron, 2005. "Sznajd model and its applications," HSC Research Reports HSC/05/04, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Technology.
    3. Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Józef Sznajd, 2000. "Opinion Evolution In Closed Community," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(06), pages 1157-1165.
    4. B. M. Roehner & D. Sornette & J. V. Andersen, 2004. "Response Functions To Critical Shocks In Social Sciences: An Empirical And Numerical Study," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 809-834.
    5. Lorenzo Sabatelli & Peter Richmond, 2003. "Phase Transitions, Memory And Frustration In A Sznajd-Like Model With Synchronous Updating," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(09), pages 1223-1229.
    6. Sznajd-Weron, K. & Weron, R., 2003. "How effective is advertising in duopoly markets?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 437-444.
    7. Sabatelli, Lorenzo & Richmond, Peter, 2004. "Non-monotonic spontaneous magnetization in a Sznajd-like consensus model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 334(1), pages 274-280.
    8. Christian Schulze, 2003. "Advertising In The Sznajd Marketing Model," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 95-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sznajd-Weron, Katarzyna & Sznajd, Józef & Weron, Tomasz, 2021. "A review on the Sznajd model — 20 years after," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    2. Quanbo Zha & Gang Kou & Hengjie Zhang & Haiming Liang & Xia Chen & Cong-Cong Li & Yucheng Dong, 2020. "Opinion dynamics in finance and business: a literature review and research opportunities," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Catherine A. Glass & David H. Glass, 2021. "Social Influence of Competing Groups and Leaders in Opinion Dynamics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 799-823, October.
    4. Sabatelli, Lorenzo & Richmond, Peter, 2004. "A consensus-based dynamics for market volumes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 344(1), pages 62-66.
    5. Gary Mckeown & Noel Sheehy, 2006. "Mass Media and Polarisation Processes in the Bounded Confidence Model of Opinion Dynamics," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11.
    6. Krzysztof Urbanowicz & Peter Richmond & Janusz A. Ho{l}yst, 2014. "A simple model of local prices and associated risk evaluation," Papers 1408.1352, arXiv.org.
    7. Song, Xiao & Shi, Wen & Tan, Gary & Ma, Yaofei, 2015. "Multi-level tolerance opinion dynamics in military command and control networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 437(C), pages 322-332.
    8. Song, Xiao & Zhang, Shaoyun & Qian, Lidong, 2013. "Opinion dynamics in networked command and control organizations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(20), pages 5206-5217.
    9. Agnieszka Kowalska-Styczen, 2009. "Simulation model ofconsumer decision making," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Technology, Institute of Organization and Management, vol. 4, pages 47-60.
    10. Fan, Kangqi & Pedrycz, Witold, 2015. "Emergence and spread of extremist opinions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 87-97.
    11. Agnieszka Kowalska-Styczeń, 2009. "Simulation model of consumer decision making," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 19(4), pages 47-60.
    12. Dimitris Tsintsaris & Milan Tsompanoglou & Evangelos Ioannidis, 2024. "Dynamics of Social Influence and Knowledge in Networks: Sociophysics Models and Applications in Social Trading, Behavioral Finance and Business," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.
    13. Hang-Hyun Jo & Jeoung-Yoo Kim, 2012. "Competitive Targeted Marketing," ISER Discussion Paper 0834, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    14. Piotr Przybyła & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Rafał Weron, 2014. "Diffusion Of Innovation Within An Agent-Based Model: Spinsons, Independence And Advertising," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-22.
    15. Guzmán-Vargas, L. & Hernández-Pérez, R., 2006. "Small-world topology and memory effects on decision time in opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 372(2), pages 326-332.
    16. AskariSichani, Omid & Jalili, Mahdi, 2015. "Influence maximization of informed agents in social networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 254(C), pages 229-239.
    17. Dahlan, Rolan Mauludy & Situngkir, Hokky, 2010. "Evolution of Consumers’ Preferences due to Innovation," MPRA Paper 24159, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Song, Xiao & Shi, Wen & Ma, Yaofei & Yang, Chen, 2015. "Impact of informal networks on opinion dynamics in hierarchically formal organization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 916-924.
    19. Sabatelli, Lorenzo & Richmond, Peter, 2004. "Non-monotonic spontaneous magnetization in a Sznajd-like consensus model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 334(1), pages 274-280.
    20. Juliette Rouchier & Emily Tanimura, 2012. "When overconfident agents slow down collective learning," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00623966, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:426:y:2015:i:c:p:16-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.