IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v87y2024ics0927538x24002609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Buffer or substitute? Corporate financialization and leverage manipulation

Author

Listed:
  • Liao, Yinchao
  • Wang, Jun
  • Liao, Wenru
  • Shu, Xiaoyang
  • Li, Zhiyong

Abstract

This study examines the impact of financialization on leverage manipulation for nonfinancial companies in China from 2011 to 2021. Using the XLT-LEVM measurement method, we find that corporate financialization can inhibit leverage manipulation. Mechanism analysis suggests that corporate financialization deters leverage manipulation by crowding out debt financing in a substantive way. According to heterogeneity analysis, the inhibitory effect is less pronounced in firms with short-term solvency pressure and intensive external attention. Our findings extend the literature on corporate financialization and demonstrate its role in mitigating leverage manipulation, with implications for both financial practice and public policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Liao, Yinchao & Wang, Jun & Liao, Wenru & Shu, Xiaoyang & Li, Zhiyong, 2024. "Buffer or substitute? Corporate financialization and leverage manipulation," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:87:y:2024:i:c:s0927538x24002609
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X24002609
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate financialization; Leverage manipulation; Precautionary saving; Speculative motive;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:87:y:2024:i:c:s0927538x24002609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.