IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v24y2013icp301-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between satellite and home market volumes: Evidence from cross-listed Singapore futures contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Frino, Alex
  • Harris, Frederick H.deB.
  • Lepone, Andrew
  • Wong, Jin Boon

Abstract

This paper examines the order flow diversion hypothesis using cross-listed Singapore Exchange (SGX) futures contracts to test if the existence of an off-shore market causes the order migration of futures volume from the domestic to foreign markets. Using structural equation systems estimation based on daily turnover, we observe that a 10% increase in the turnover of the SGX traded Nikkei 225 leads to an increase of 6.6% for the Nikkei 225 traded on the OSE. Further examination of the cross-listed Nifty and the MSCI-Taiwan Index futures provide similar evidence of a positive and significant relationship. We also observe that off-shore index futures have a positive and significant impact on domestic component stocks' turnover. Evidence in this study supports the rejection of the order-flow hypothesis, and suggests that a mutually beneficial relationship exists between cross-border exchanges.

Suggested Citation

  • Frino, Alex & Harris, Frederick H.deB. & Lepone, Andrew & Wong, Jin Boon, 2013. "The relationship between satellite and home market volumes: Evidence from cross-listed Singapore futures contracts," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 301-311.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:24:y:2013:i:c:p:301-311
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X13000346
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chung, Huimin & Hseu, Mei-Maun, 2008. "Expiration day effects of Taiwan index futures: The case of the Singapore and Taiwan Futures Exchanges," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 107-120, April.
    2. Sie Ting Lau & Thomas H. McInish, 2002. "Cross‐Listings and Home Market Trading Volume: The Case of Malaysia and Singapore," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 25(4), pages 477-484, December.
    3. Huang, Yu Chuan, 2004. "The market microstructure and relative performance of Taiwan stock index futures: a comparison of the Singapore exchange and the Taiwan futures exchange," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 335-350, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanjay Sehgal & Mala Dutt, 2016. "Domestic and international information linkages between NSE Nifty spot and futures markets: an empirical study for India," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 43(3), pages 239-258, September.
    2. Lepone, Andrew & Wong, Jin Boon, 2017. "Pseudo market-makers, market quality and the minimum tick size," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 88-100.
    3. Kumar, S.S.S. & Sampath, Aravind, 2019. "What drives the off-shore futures market? Evidence from India and China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 394-402.
    4. Kao, Erin H. & Ho, Tsung-wu & Fung, Hung-Gay, 2015. "Price linkage between the US and Japanese futures across different time zones: An analysis of the minute-by-minute data," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 321-336.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, S.S.S. & Sampath, Aravind, 2019. "What drives the off-shore futures market? Evidence from India and China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 394-402.
    2. Edward Chow & Chung-Wen Hung & Christine Liu & Cheng-Yi Shiu, 2013. "Expiration day effects and market manipulation: evidence from Taiwan," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 441-462, October.
    3. Chin‐Ho Chen & Junmao Chiu & Huimin Chung, 2020. "Arbitrage opportunities, liquidity provision, and trader types in an index option market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 279-307, March.
    4. Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Alex Plastun, 2023. "Witching days and abnormal profits in the us stock market," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2182016-218, December.
    5. Yu Chuan Huang & Jian‐Hsin Chou, 2007. "Order Imbalance and Its Impact on Market Performance: Order‐driven vs. Quote‐driven Markets," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(9‐10), pages 1596-1614, November.
    6. Blasco, N. & Corredor, P. & Satrústegui, N., 2023. "Is there an expiration effect in the bitcoin market?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 647-663.
    7. Alex Plastun & Ludmila Khomutenko & Serhii Bashlai, 2022. "Is There Any Witching in the Cryptocurrency Market?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, February.
    8. repec:wyi:journl:002180 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Susan Thomas, 2010. "Call auctions: A Solution to some difficulties in Indian finance," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2010-006, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    10. Abdallah, Abed AL-Nasser & Abdallah, Wissam, 2019. "Does cross-listing in the US improve investment efficiency? Evidence from UK firms," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 215-231.
    11. Biao Guo & Qian Han & Maonan Liu & Doojin Ryu, 2013. "A Tale of Two Index Futures: The Intraday Price Discovery Process between the China Financial Futures Exchange and the Singapore Exchange," Working Papers 2013-10-14, Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Xiamen University.
    12. Lourdes Treviño, 2005. "Development and volume growth of organized derivatives trade in emerging markets," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 31-82, November.
    13. M. Kabir Hassan & Jung Suk-Yu, 2007. "Stock Exchange Alliances in Organization of Islamic Conferences (OIC) Countries," NFI Working Papers 2007-WP-18, Indiana State University, Scott College of Business, Networks Financial Institute.
    14. Chen, Chin-Ho, 2019. "Downside jump risk and the levels of futures-cash basis," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    15. Emily Lin & Carl R. Chen, 2019. "Settlement procedures and stock market efficiency," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 164-185, February.
    16. Yiuman Tse & Paramita Bandyopadhyay, 2006. "Multi-market trading in the Eurodollar futures market," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 321-341, May.
    17. Chng, Michael T., 2009. "Economic linkages across commodity futures: Hedging and trading implications," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 958-970, May.
    18. Milena Suliga & Tomasz Wójtowicz, 2019. "Expiration day effects of stock and index futures on the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 50(1), pages 45-82.
    19. Jain, Archana & Jain, Pankaj K. & McInish, Thomas H. & McKenzie, Michael, 2013. "Worldwide reach of short selling regulations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 177-197.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:24:y:2013:i:c:p:301-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.