IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v7y2020ics2214716019300570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic order quantity for perishables with decreasing willingness to purchase during their life cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Díaz, Ronald David Suárez
  • Paternina-Arboleda, Carlos D.
  • Martínez-Flores, José Luis
  • Jimenez-Barros, Miguel A.

Abstract

In an inventory management model for perishables, depletion due to interacting with the demand is of importance, but also, damage to products is a relevant variable. This article considers that demand and sales phenomena do not always go hand-in-hand. The demand process relates to the willingness to acquire products in good condition, giving the customer the power to evaluate the quality of the product before an effective purchase takes place. We also considered the cost of disposing of unsold units, besides the conventional costs for storage and procurement. We then proposed a mathematical model to derive the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) under specific conditions, in order to minimize the expected management cost of perishables, assuming constant demand and linearly decreasing purchase probability during the product life cycle. We proposed several random instances and validate the mathematical model using simulation. We then found the optimal parameters for the inventory policy using a third-order numerical approximation. Last, we developed a sensitivity analysis over the product life cycle to prove that the proposed model approximates to a traditional EOQ model for perishables when life cycle is sufficiently large.

Suggested Citation

  • Díaz, Ronald David Suárez & Paternina-Arboleda, Carlos D. & Martínez-Flores, José Luis & Jimenez-Barros, Miguel A., 2020. "Economic order quantity for perishables with decreasing willingness to purchase during their life cycle," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:7:y:2020:i:c:s2214716019300570
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2020.100146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716019300570
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2020.100146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saha, S. & Goyal, S.K., 2015. "Supply chain coordination contracts with inventory level and retail price dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 140-152.
    2. Boulaksil, Youssef, 2016. "Safety stock placement in supply chains with demand forecast updates," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 27-31.
    3. Wang, Xiaojun & Li, Dong, 2012. "A dynamic product quality evaluation based pricing model for perishable food supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 906-917.
    4. Diana G. Ramírez; & Julio Mario Daza-Escorcia & Javier Visbal Martinez & Carlos D. Paternina-Arboleda & Alfredo Garcia, 2012. "The dynamic demand game: a Markov state fictitious play approach to a two-echelon supply chain problem under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 319-335.
    5. Gan, Shu-San & Pujawan, I Nyoman & Suparno, & Widodo, Basuki, 2018. "Pricing decisions for short life-cycle product in a closed-loop supply chain with random yield and random demands," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 174-190.
    6. Steven Nahmias, 1982. "Perishable Inventory Theory: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 680-708, August.
    7. Xu, Haiping & (Ben) Wang, Hsu-Pin, 1990. "An economic ordering policy model for deteriorating items with time proportional demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 21-27, May.
    8. Lee, Chang-Yong & Lee, Dongju, 2018. "An efficient method for solving a correlated multi-item inventory system," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 13-21.
    9. Goyal, S. K. & Giri, B. C., 2001. "Recent trends in modeling of deteriorating inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Hariga, Moncer A. & Benkherouf, Lakdere, 1994. "Optimal and heuristic inventory replenishment models for deteriorating items with exponential time-varying demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 123-137, November.
    11. Liming Liu & Din‐Hua Shi, 1999. "An (s, S) model for inventory with exponential lifetimes and renewal demands," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 39-56, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guowei Liu & Jianxiong Zhang & Wansheng Tang, 2015. "Joint dynamic pricing and investment strategy for perishable foods with price-quality dependent demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 397-416, March.
    2. Govindan, K. & Jafarian, A. & Khodaverdi, R. & Devika, K., 2014. "Two-echelon multiple-vehicle location–routing problem with time windows for optimization of sustainable supply chain network of perishable food," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 9-28.
    3. Goyal, S. K. & Giri, B. C., 2001. "Recent trends in modeling of deteriorating inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Cenk Çalışkan, 2022. "A Comparison of Simple Closed-Form Solutions for the EOQ Problem for Exponentially Deteriorating Items," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Ruibin Bai & Graham Kendall, 2008. "A Model for Fresh Produce Shelf-Space Allocation and Inventory Management with Freshness-Condition-Dependent Demand," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 78-85, February.
    6. V. Radhamani & B. Sivakumar & G. Arivarignan, 2022. "A Comparative Study on Replenishment Policies for Perishable Inventory System with Service Facility and Multiple Server Vacation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 229-265, March.
    7. Ketzenberg, M.E. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M., 2009. "The Value of RFID Technology Enabled Information to Manage Perishables," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-020-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Alamri, Adel A. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2018. "Beyond LIFO and FIFO: Exploring an Allocation-In-Fraction-Out (AIFO) policy in a two-warehouse inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 33-45.
    9. Lodree Jr., Emmett J. & Uzochukwu, Benedict M., 2008. "Production planning for a deteriorating item with stochastic demand and consumer choice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 219-232, December.
    10. Ketzenberg, Michael & Oliva, Rogelio & Wang, Yimin & Webster, Scott, 2023. "Retailer inventory data sharing in a fresh product supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 680-693.
    11. Janssen, Larissa & Diabat, Ali & Sauer, Jürgen & Herrmann, Frank, 2018. "A stochastic micro-periodic age-based inventory replenishment policy for perishable goods," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 445-465.
    12. Li‐Ming Chen & Amar Sapra, 2013. "Joint inventory and pricing decisions for perishable products with two‐period lifetime," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(5), pages 343-366, August.
    13. Omar Ahumada & J. Villalobos, 2011. "A tactical model for planning the production and distribution of fresh produce," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 339-358, October.
    14. Nita H. Shah & Chetansinh R. Vaghela, 2017. "Economic order quantity for deteriorating items under inflation with time and advertisement dependent demand," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(1), pages 168-180, March.
    15. R Bai & E K Burke & G Kendall, 2008. "Heuristic, meta-heuristic and hyper-heuristic approaches for fresh produce inventory control and shelf space allocation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(10), pages 1387-1397, October.
    16. Rong, Aiying & Akkerman, Renzo & Grunow, Martin, 2011. "An optimization approach for managing fresh food quality throughout the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 421-429, May.
    17. J-M Chen & L-T Chen, 2004. "Pricing and lot-sizing for a deteriorating item in a periodic review inventory system with shortages," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(8), pages 892-901, August.
    18. Wang, X. & Li, D. & O'brien, C. & Li, Y., 2010. "A production planning model to reduce risk and improve operations management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 463-474, April.
    19. Stratos Ioannidis & Oualid Jouini & Angelos Economopoulos & Vassilis Kouikoglou, 2013. "Control policies for single-stage production systems with perishable inventory and customer impatience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 115-138, October.
    20. S. Panda & S. Saha & M. Basu, 2009. "An EOQ model for perishable products with discounted selling price and stock dependent demand," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 17(1), pages 31-53, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:7:y:2020:i:c:s2214716019300570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.