IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v12y2024ics2214716024000022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The decrease of ED patient boarding by implementing a stock management policy in hospital admissions

Author

Listed:
  • Jaén, Sebastián

Abstract

The presence of congestion is a common scenario in tertiary-level hospitals worldwide. Current research suggests that an increase in hospital bed capacity is not a long-term solution given that patient demand adapts to added capacity. Recent literature suggests the need for the implementation of a policy of inter-hospital transfers to divert patients to outpatient priority services or home care. This policy has proven to be effective in reducing ED boarding without compromising patient safety. However, determining the required number of patients to be admitted is key. The dynamic nature of hospital bed availability and discharges requires an admission process able to be in synchrony with those variations. A mismatch between patient demand and hospital admissions will result in either ED boarding or idle capacity. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a methodology to support the process of hospital admissions by providing as an input a threshold for the number of patients to be admitted. The methodology is tested using a system dynamics model that replicates one year of operations of a tertiary-level hospital. The simulations reveal the potential of the methodology to decrease the ED inpatient boarding rate as well as ED and hospital length of stay.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaén, Sebastián, 2024. "The decrease of ED patient boarding by implementing a stock management policy in hospital admissions," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:12:y:2024:i:c:s2214716024000022
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2024.100298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000022
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2024.100298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:12:y:2024:i:c:s2214716024000022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.