IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v214y2023icp204-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance analysis of a multi server retrial queueing system with unreliable server, discouragement and vacation model

Author

Listed:
  • V., Saravanan
  • V., Poongothai
  • P., Godhandaraman

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate a Markovian multi server retrial queueing system with unreliable servers, discouraged customers and vacation. The model is explored with a view to reduce the impact of unreliable servers on the system performance. This is attained by providing regular maintenance to the servers through synchronised vacation. Further, the customer facing service interruption on account of server breakdown is directed to the orbit from where the customer can retry seeking service. In this study, the stationary system size distribution is framed by quasi-birth–death (QBD) process. The rate matrix and steady state probabilities are established using matrix geometric method (MGM). The performance measures are derived by using matrix form expressions. The effects induced by the system parameters on the performance metrics are numerically and graphically analysed. Through numerical investigation, we provide insightful information that enables to manage the system to give enhanced system performance.

Suggested Citation

  • V., Saravanan & V., Poongothai & P., Godhandaraman, 2023. "Performance analysis of a multi server retrial queueing system with unreliable server, discouragement and vacation model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 204-226.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:214:y:2023:i:c:p:204-226
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475423002884
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2023.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shan Gao & Hua Dong & Xianchao Wang, 2021. "Correction to: Equilibrium and pricing analysis for an unreliable retrial queue with limited idle period and single vacation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 645-646, March.
    2. Yu, Senlin & Liu, Zaiming & Wu, Jinbiao, 2016. "Equilibrium strategies of the unobservable M/M/1 queue with balking and delayed repairs," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 56-65.
    3. Economou, Antonis & Logothetis, Dimitrios & Manou, Athanasia, 2022. "The value of reneging for strategic customers in queueing systems with server vacations/failures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 960-976.
    4. B. Krishna Kumar & R. Rukmani & A. Thanikachalam & V. Kanakasabapathi, 2018. "Performance analysis of retrial queue with server subject to two types of breakdowns and repairs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 521-559, July.
    5. R. Sudhesh & A. Azhagappan, 2019. "Analysis of an M/M/c queue with heterogeneous servers, balking and reneging," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 36(3), pages 293-309.
    6. D. Arivudainambi & P. Godhandaraman, 2015. "Retrial queueing system with balking, optional service and vacation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 67-84, June.
    7. Amit Choudhury & Pallabi Medhi, 2011. "Balking and reneging in multiserver Markovian queuing system," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 377-394.
    8. Rakesh Kumar & Sapana Sharma, 2018. "Transient analysis of an M/M/c queuing system with balking and retention of reneging customers," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 1318-1327, March.
    9. Kaustav Dutta & Amit Choudhury, 2020. "Estimation of performance measures of M/M/1 queues – a simulation-based approach," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 265-279.
    10. Shan Gao & Hua Dong & Xianchao Wang, 2021. "Equilibrium and pricing analysis for an unreliable retrial queue with limited idle period and single vacation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 621-643, March.
    11. Jeongsim Kim & Bara Kim, 2016. "A survey of retrial queueing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(1), pages 3-36, December.
    12. Anatoly Nazarov & János Sztrik & Anna Kvach & Ádám Tóth, 2020. "Asymptotic sojourn time analysis of finite-source M/M/1 retrial queueing system with collisions and server subject to breakdowns and repairs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 417-434, May.
    13. Jinting Wang & Yu Zhang & Zhe George Zhang, 2021. "Strategic joining in an M/M/K queue with asynchronous and synchronous multiple vacations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 161-179, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabi Hanukov & Uri Yechiali, 2024. "Orbit while in service," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Wang, Kuo-Hsiung & Wu, Chia-Huang & Yen, Tseng-Chang, 2022. "Comparative cost-benefit analysis of four retrial systems with preventive maintenance and unreliable service station," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Gabi Hanukov & Michael Hassoun & Oren Musicant, 2021. "On the Benefits of Providing Timely Information in Ticket Queues with Balking and Calling Times," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Anatoly Nazarov & János Sztrik & Anna Kvach & Tamás Bérczes, 2019. "Asymptotic analysis of finite-source M/M/1 retrial queueing system with collisions and server subject to breakdowns and repairs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 213-229, June.
    5. S. M. Qasim & Jamal A. Farooquie, 2024. "Economics of secondary queue of Indian railways passenger reservation system: a queueing science approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(4), pages 1795-1824, December.
    6. Wu, Chia-Huang & Yen, Tseng-Chang & Wang, Kuo-Hsiung, 2021. "Availability and Comparison of Four Retrial Systems with Imperfect Coverage and General Repair Times," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Fan Xu & Ruiling Tian & Qi Shao, 2024. "Optimal Pricing Strategy in an Unreliable M/M/1 Retrial Queue with Delayed Repair and Breakdown Deterioration," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Bin Liu & Jie Min & Yiqiang Q. Zhao, 2023. "Refined tail asymptotic properties for the $$M^X/G/1$$ M X / G / 1 retrial queue," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 65-105, June.
    9. Yang, Dong-Yuh & Tsao, Chih-Lung, 2019. "Reliability and availability analysis of standby systems with working vacations and retrial of failed components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 46-55.
    10. Anatoly Nazarov & János Sztrik & Anna Kvach & Ádám Tóth, 2022. "Asymptotic Analysis of Finite-Source M/GI/1 Retrial Queueing Systems with Collisions and Server Subject to Breakdowns and Repairs," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1503-1518, September.
    11. P. Vijaya Laxmi & E. Girija Bhavani, 2024. "Strategic behavior of customers in a second optional service queue with service interruptions," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(2), pages 762-784, June.
    12. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Hoseinpour, Pooya, 2019. "Service system design for managing interruption risks: A backup-service risk-mitigation strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 417-431.
    13. Faruk Akın & E. Lerzan Örmeci, 2022. "Optimal control of a loss system with feedback," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 381-383, April.
    14. Bin Liu & Yiqiang Q. Zhao, 2020. "Tail asymptotics for the $$M_1,M_2/G_1,G_2/1$$ M 1 , M 2 / G 1 , G 2 / 1 retrial queue with non-preemptive priority," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 169-199, October.
    15. Zaiming Liu & Can Cao & Shan Gao, 2019. "Equilibrium Joining Strategies in the Geo / Geo K /1 Queueing System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Tang Tang & Lijuan Jia & Jin Hu & Yue Wang & Cheng Ma, 2022. "Reliability analysis and selective maintenance for multistate queueing system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 3-17, February.
    17. Velika I. Dragieva & Tuan Phung-Duc, 2020. "A finite-source M/G/1 retrial queue with outgoing calls," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(1), pages 101-121, October.
    18. Vaishnawi Shree & Shweta Upadhyaya & Rakhee Kulshrestha, 2024. "Cost scrutiny of discrete-time priority queue with cluster arrival and Bernoulli feedback," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(4), pages 2312-2345, December.
    19. Raina Raj & Vidyottama Jain, 2024. "Resource optimization for MMAP[c]/PH[c]/S catastrophic queueing model with PH retrial times," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(3), pages 1192-1223, September.
    20. Vijay Rajan Lumb & Indra Rani, 2022. "Analytically simple solution to discrete-time queue with catastrophes, balking and state-dependent service," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 783-817, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:214:y:2023:i:c:p:204-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.