IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v43y2014icp236-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Back to square one? Fisheries allocation under pressure

Author

Listed:
  • Standal, Dag
  • Hersoug, Bjørn

Abstract

In Norway there is a long tradition of allocating fish resources among the fishers. In modern times this has been done through specific allocation keys. This article describes the development of the allocation system for the offshore (trawler) and coastal fleets. The allocation system is closely related to stock assessment and the fixing of global quotas (TACs) as well as structural policies to prevent “capacity creep”. All three systems can be seen as institutions, where the TAC-machine is firmly established while the two others are under pressure, largely due to competition on the global fish market. The established goal of maintaining a diversified fishing fleet is now gradually being dismantled, with repercussions for coastal employment and settlement patterns. The coastal fleet is per 2013 something entirely different from the situation in 1990, when the coastal fisheries were effectively closed. Sooner or later this development is bound to change also the management institutions, and in particular the allocation system and the closely related structural policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Standal, Dag & Hersoug, Bjørn, 2014. "Back to square one? Fisheries allocation under pressure," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 236-245.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:43:y:2014:i:c:p:236-245
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X13001309
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Standal, Dag & Aarset, Bernt, 2002. "The tragedy of soft choices: capacity accumulation and lopsided allocation in the Norwegian coastal cod fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 221-230, May.
    2. Standal, Dag, 2008. "The rise and fall of factory trawlers: An eclectic approach," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 326-332, May.
    3. Jentoft, Svein, 2004. "Institutions in fisheries: what they are, what they do, and how they change," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 137-149, March.
    4. Standal, Dag & Aarset, Bernt, 2008. "The IVQ regime in Norway: A stable alternative to an ITQ regime?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 663-668, July.
    5. Hannesson, Rögnvaldur, 2013. "Norway's experience with ITQs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 264-269.
    6. Joseph R.A Ayee, 2005. "Working Paper 82 - Public Sector Management in Africa," Working Paper Series 217, African Development Bank.
    7. Jentoft, Svein, 2007. "Limits of governability: Institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 360-370, July.
    8. Standal, Dag, 2007. "Institutional changes and fleet structure: Towards the final solution?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 94-100, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Standal, Dag & Annie Sønvisen, Signe, 2015. "Gear liberalization in the Northeast Arctic cod fisheries – Implications for sustainability, efficiency and legitimacy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 141-148.
    2. Standal, Dag & Sønvisen, Signe Annie & Asche, Frank, 2016. "Fishing in deep waters: The development of a deep-sea fishing coastal fleet in Norway," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-7.
    3. Tim Gray, 2024. "Fishing for Principles: The Fairness of Fishing Quota Allocations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Standal, Dag & Hersoug, Bjørn, 2015. "Shaping technology, building society; the industrialization of the Norwegian cod fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 66-74.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kahmann, Birte & Stumpf, Klara Helene & Baumgärtner, Stefan, 2015. "Notions of justice held by stakeholders of the Newfoundland fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 37-50.
    2. Standal, Dag & Hersoug, Bjørn, 2015. "Shaping technology, building society; the industrialization of the Norwegian cod fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 66-74.
    3. Eriksson, Hampus & Conand, Chantal & Lovatelli, Alessandro & Muthiga, Nyawira A. & Purcell, Steven W., 2015. "Governance structures and sustainability in Indian Ocean sea cucumber fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 16-22.
    4. Standal, Dag & Annie Sønvisen, Signe, 2015. "Gear liberalization in the Northeast Arctic cod fisheries – Implications for sustainability, efficiency and legitimacy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 141-148.
    5. Iori, Giulia & Renò, Roberto & De Masi, Giulia & Caldarelli, Guido, 2007. "Trading strategies in the Italian interbank market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 376(C), pages 467-479.
    6. Barbara Quimby & Arielle Levine, 2018. "Participation, Power, and Equity: Examining Three Key Social Dimensions of Fisheries Comanagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Song, Andrew, 2018. "Reconstructing Governability: How Fisheries Are Made Governable," MarXiv zavwc, Center for Open Science.
    8. Voyer, Michelle & Gollan, Natalie & Barclay, Kate & Gladstone, William, 2015. "‘It׳s part of me’; understanding the values, images and principles of coastal users and their influence on the social acceptability of MPAs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 93-102.
    9. Francis Y. Owusu, 2012. "Organizational culture and public sector reforms in a post–Washington consensus era: Lessons from Ghana’s good reformers," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 12(2-3), pages 135-151, July.
    10. H. Spencer Banzhaf & Yaqin Liu & Martin Smith & Frank Asche, 2019. "Non-Parametric Tests of the Tragedy of the Commons," NBER Working Papers 26398, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Fiona Nunan, 2007. "Reducing poverty through fisheries co-management: an analysis of design and intentions in Uganda," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(8), pages 1151-1164.
    12. Thomas, Alyssa S. & Milfont, Taciano L. & Gavin, Michael C., 2015. "What determines fishers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards regulations? A case study from the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 547-554.
    13. Standal, Dag & Sønvisen, Signe Annie, 2015. "Into the scrap iron business: Transaction costs for fleet sustainability in Norway," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 213-217.
    14. Popovic, G., 2010. "Theory And Practice Of Regional Economic Integrations," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 57(2).
    15. Herrera-Racionero, Paloma & Lizcano-Fernández, Emmánuel & Miret-Pastor, Lluís, 2015. "“Us” and “them”. Fishermen from Gandía and the loss of institutional legitimacy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 130-136.
    16. Mehedi Masud & Md. Rakib Hossain, 2021. "Interpreting lived experiences: The dilemmas of public sector leaders," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 180-190, October.
    17. Barnes, Michele L. & Arita, Shawn & Kalberg, Kolter & Leung, PingSun, 2017. "When does it pay to cooperate? Strategic information exchange in the harvest of common-pool fishery resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-11.
    18. Di Lucia, Lorenzo, 2013. "Too difficult to govern? An assessment of the governability of transport biofuels in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 81-88.
    19. Standal, Dag & Sønvisen, Signe Annie & Asche, Frank, 2016. "Fishing in deep waters: The development of a deep-sea fishing coastal fleet in Norway," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-7.
    20. Catalin Chiriac & Nicoleta Rusu, 2011. "International Biomass Trade And Sustainable Development: An Overview," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3(4), pages 488-496, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:43:y:2014:i:c:p:236-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.