IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v31y2007i2p94-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional changes and fleet structure: Towards the final solution?

Author

Listed:
  • Standal, Dag

Abstract

The introduction of modern trawl fishing in Norway after the Second World War was intended to be the very platform for the modernisation of the fishing industry. Right up to the end of the 1970s, market orientation and the absence of state regulation of fishing were on the agenda. However, the growth of unprofitable overcapacity, increase of international fishing efforts in the Barents Sea and declining resources contributed to the introduction of licences and quotas as a means of control. Within this traditional framework, the introduction of the unit quota system to concentrate the quotas at fewer vessels, have been regarded as the most important policy tool to cut down overcapacity. Even so, one can ascertain today that the unit quota system did not solve the problems with overcapacity, lack of profitability and allocation conflicts in the trawler fleet. This article deals with the content of the unit quota system and we explain how the overall effects deviate from the public goals of the system. Based on these facts, the authorities have launched new and dramatic measures intended to reduce catch capacity. The question now is whether or not the authorities' new strategy will be the final solution for the problems of overcapacity in the trawler fleet.

Suggested Citation

  • Standal, Dag, 2007. "Institutional changes and fleet structure: Towards the final solution?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 94-100, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:31:y:2007:i:2:p:94-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(06)00036-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Standal, Dag & Hersoug, Bjørn, 2014. "Back to square one? Fisheries allocation under pressure," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 236-245.
    2. Standal, Dag & Hersoug, Bjørn, 2015. "Shaping technology, building society; the industrialization of the Norwegian cod fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 66-74.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:31:y:2007:i:2:p:94-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.