IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v90y2020ics0264837719310634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Striving for global cities with governance approach in transitional China: Case study of Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Huanming
  • Cheng, Zhe
  • Zhu, Dajian

Abstract

More and more cities in transitional China (e.g., Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen) have been striving to become global cities in the past three decades. To systematically study global cities, this paper adopted the pressure-state-response (PSR) framework to analyze Shanghai’s global-city development. The findings showed that Shanghai facing unbalanced and inadequate spatial fragmentation problems, such as social wealth gaps between urban and rural areas, and development disparity among different districts within the city. Causes were that urban development strategies (e.g., pursuit of economic growth, and differentiated development strategies between center city and suburban cities) in the past affected the spatial fragmentations. To become an excellent global city, Shanghai’s government is using the pathway of governance to restructure its space and improve its global and regional influence.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Huanming & Cheng, Zhe & Zhu, Dajian, 2020. "Striving for global cities with governance approach in transitional China: Case study of Shanghai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719310634
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719310634
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yehua Dennis Wei & Chi Kin Leung, 2005. "Development Zones, Foreign Investment, and Global City Formation in Shanghai," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 16-40, February.
    2. Todd H. Kuethe, 2012. "Spatial Fragmentation and the Value of Residential Housing," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(1), pages 16-27.
    3. Jianming Cai & Victor F.S. Sit, 2003. "Measuring world city formation – The case of Shanghai," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 37(3), pages 435-446, August.
    4. Jennifer Robinson, 2002. "Global and world cities: a view from off the map," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 531-554, September.
    5. Richard G. Smith, 2014. "Beyond the Global City Concept and the Myth of ‘Command and Control’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 98-115, January.
    6. Carola Fricke, 2015. "Spatial Governance across Borders Revisited: Organizational Forms and Spatial Planning in Metropolitan Cross-border Regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 849-870, May.
    7. K. Landman, 2011. "Urban Fragmentation: Different Views on its Causes and Consequences," Chapters, in: H. S. Geyer (ed.), International Handbook of Urban Policy, Volume 3, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. John Friedmann, 1986. "The World City Hypothesis," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 69-83, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiantian Gu & Shuyu Liu & Xuefan Liu & Yujia Shan & Enyang Hao & Miaomiao Niu, 2023. "Evaluation of the Smart City and Analysis of Its Spatial–Temporal Characteristics in China: A Case Study of 26 Cities in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Zeng, Chen & Yin, Yizhen & Guo, Luyu & Liu, Chenlu & Zhang, Yang & Huang, Zhengxue, 2024. "Integrating the administrative spillover effect into the spatial governance system to revisit land development: A study in urban-rural fringe areas of Wuhan and neighboring cities, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Fei He & Qiuying Lai & Jie Ma & Geng Wei & Weixin Li, 2023. "Design and Application of an Early Warning and Emergency Response System in the Transboundary Area of the Taihu Lake Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Wang, Huanming & Ran, Bing, 2022. "How business-related governance strategies impact paths towards the formation of global cities? An institutional embeddedness perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Ju He & Yunxiao Dang & Wenzhong Zhang & Li Chen, 2020. "Perception of Urban Public Safety of Floating Population with Higher Education Background: Evidence from Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Huanming & Ran, Bing, 2022. "How business-related governance strategies impact paths towards the formation of global cities? An institutional embeddedness perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Karen Lai, 2012. "Differentiated Markets: Shanghai, Beijing and Hong Kong in China’s Financial Centre Network," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 1275-1296, May.
    3. Ben Derudder & Christof Parnreiter, 2014. "Introduction: The Interlocking Network Model for Studying Urban Networks: Outline, Potential, Critiques, and Ways Forward," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(4), pages 373-386, September.
    4. Kathy Pain & Gilles Van Hamme & Sandra Vinciguerra & Quentin David, 2016. "Global networks, cities and economic performance: Observations from an analysis of cities in Europe and the USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1137-1161, May.
    5. Renato A. Orozco Pereira & Ben Derudder, 2010. "Determinants of Dynamics in the World City Network, 2000-2004," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(9), pages 1949-1967, August.
    6. Chengjin Wang & César Ducruet, 2012. "New port development and global city making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan multilayered gateway hub," Post-Print halshs-00717879, HAL.
    7. Vladimir Spiridonov & Salavat Shabiev & Sergei Aliukov, 2022. "Scientific Aspects of the Study of Transcontinental Relations and Global Settlement," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Eugene J. McCann, 2004. "Urban Political Economy Beyond the 'Global City'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(12), pages 2315-2333, November.
    9. Zachary Neal, 2010. "Refining the Air Traffic Approach to City Networks," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(10), pages 2195-2215, September.
    10. Yunsong Chen & Fei Yan & Yi Zhang, 2017. "Local name, global fame: The international visibility of Chinese cities in modern times," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(11), pages 2652-2668, August.
    11. Richard G. Smith, 2014. "Beyond the Global City Concept and the Myth of ‘Command and Control’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 98-115, January.
    12. Allan Watson & Jonathan V. Beaverstock, 2014. "World City Network Research at a Theoretical Impasse: On the Need to Re-Establish Qualitative Approaches to Understanding Agency in World City Networks," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(4), pages 412-426, September.
    13. Miaoxi Zhao & Xingjian Liu & Ben Derudder & Ye Zhong & Wei Shen, 2015. "Mapping producer services networks in mainland Chinese cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(16), pages 3018-3034, December.
    14. Wang, Chengjin & Ducruet, César, 2012. "New port development and global city making: emergence of the Shanghai–Yangshan multilayered gateway hub," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 58-69.
    15. Colin Mcfarlane, 2010. "The Comparative City: Knowledge, Learning, Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 725-742, December.
    16. Swayam Prava Das, 2023. "City connectivity via global intra‐firm linkages: An analysis of Indian cities," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 312-330, March.
    17. Zachary Neal, 2014. "Validity in World City Network Measurements," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(4), pages 427-443, September.
    18. Fenghua Pan & Ziyun He & Cheng Fang & Bofei Yang & Jinshe Liang, 2018. "World City Networks Shaped by the Global Financing of Chinese Firms: A Study Based on Initial Public Offerings of Chinese Firms on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, 1999-2017," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 751-772, September.
    19. Peter J. Taylor, 2014. "A Research Odyssey: from Interlocking Network Model to Extraordinary Cities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(4), pages 387-397, September.
    20. Parnreiter Christof, 2017. "Global Cities, globale Wertschöpfungsketten und wirtschaftliche Governance: konzeptionelle Überlegungen und eine Untersuchung der Rolle Mexico Citys," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 61(2), pages 65-79, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719310634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.