IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v141y2024ics0264837724000863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convivial fences? Property, ‘right to wildlife’ and the need for redistributive justice in South African conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Büscher, Bram
  • Thakholi, Lerato

Abstract

In South Africa, fences are ubiquitous. From urban centers to rural landscapes, myriad fences divide properties, fortify estates, and protect private interests. In biodiversity conservation, likewise, fences are instrumental in legally assigning property rights over wildlife. They are furthermore deemed necessary to avoid human-wildlife conflict, save human and animal lives and, most of all, safeguard wildlife properties for the benefit of their state or private owners. This normalization of fences and private property has, in practice, meant that colonial and apartheid-era racialized spatial injustices have not only often been maintained, but also progressively hardened in the democratic era. Overcoming these injustices inevitably means confronting the question of private property and the fences that protect them. This article does so by connecting debates on fences, private property and wildlife protection to emerging discussions around convivial conservation that seek to transform the conservation sector by combining biodiversity conservation with social justice concerns. It asks: can fences ever be convivial? The answer, like fences themselves, is not straightforward. Reflecting on historical, policy and legal discussions, as well as the authors extensive research on the South African conservation sector over the past decades, the article proposes a conceptual heuristic around processes of softening and hardening of both fences and property in order to challenge continuing processes of dispossession, injustice and unsustainable forms of conservation. Based on this heuristic, the article suggests various strategies, including a ‘right to wildlife’ and a ‘wildlife restitution’ process, to support redistributive justice in South African conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Büscher, Bram & Thakholi, Lerato, 2024. "Convivial fences? Property, ‘right to wildlife’ and the need for redistributive justice in South African conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:141:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724000863
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724000863
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith Schleicher & Julie G. Zaehringer & Constance Fastré & Bhaskar Vira & Piero Visconti & Chris Sandbrook, 2019. "Protecting half of the planet could directly affect over one billion people," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 1094-1096, December.
    2. Cherryl Walker, 2012. "Finite Land: Challenges Institutionalising Land Restitution in South Africa, 1995–2000," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 809-826.
    3. David Harvey, 2003. "The right to the city," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 939-941, December.
    4. Lenggenhager, Luregn & Ramutsindela, Maano, 2021. "Property killed a peace park dream: The entanglement of property, politics and conservation along the Gariep," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna, 2016. "City Indicators on Social Sustainability as Standardization Technologies for Smarter (Citizen-Centered) Governance of Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1193-1216, September.
    2. K. C. Ho, 2021. "Land and Housing in Singapore: Three Conversations with Anne Haila," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 325-351, March.
    3. Junxi Qian, 2015. "No right to the street: Motorcycle taxis, discourse production and the regulation of unruly mobility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2922-2947, November.
    4. Carijn Beumer, 2017. "Sustopia or Cosmopolis? A Critical Reflection on the Sustainable City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Anguelovski, Isabelle & Martínez Alier, Joan, 2014. "The ‘Environmentalism of the Poor’ revisited: Territory and place in disconnected glocal struggles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 167-176.
    6. Shakirah Esmail Hudani, 2020. "The Green Masterplan: Crisis, State Transition and Urban Transformation in Post‐Genocide Rwanda," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 673-690, July.
    7. Rasa Pranskuniene & Dalia Perkumiene, 2021. "Public Perceptions on City Landscaping during the Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease: The Case of Vilnius Pop-Up Beach, Lithuania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Alison Brown & Colman Msoka & Ibrahima Dankoco, 2015. "A refugee in my own country: Evictions or property rights in the urban informal economy?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2234-2249, September.
    9. Sören Becker & James Angel & Matthias Naumann, 2020. "Energy democracy as the right to the city: Urban energy struggles in Berlin and London," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1093-1111, September.
    10. Hyun Bang Shin, 2011. "Right to the city and critical reflections on property rights activism in China’s urban renewal contexts," CASE Papers case156, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    11. Gaël Mariani & Fabien Moullec & Trisha B Atwood & Beverley Clarkson & Richard T Conant & Leanne Cullen-Unsworth & Bronson Griscom & Julian Gutt & Jennifer Howard & Dorte Krause- Jensen & Sara M Leavit, 2024. "Co-benefits and trade-offs between Natural Climate Solutions and Sustainable Development Goals," Post-Print hal-04756965, HAL.
    12. Claire Bosmans & Racha Daher & Viviana d’Auria, 2020. "Recording Permanence and Ephemerality in the North Quarter of Brussels: Drawing at the Intersection of Time, Space, and People," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 249-261.
    13. Witten, Karen & Kearns, Robin & Carroll, Penelope, 2015. "Urban inclusion as wellbeing: Exploring children's accounts of confronting diversity on inner city streets," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 349-357.
    14. Idowu Ajibade, 2019. "Planned retreat in Global South megacities: disentangling policy, practice, and environmental justice," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 299-317, November.
    15. Camerin, Federico, 2019. "From “Ribera Plan” to “Diagonal Mar”, passing through 1992 “Vila Olímpica”. How urban renewal took place as urban regeneration in Poblenou district (Barcelona)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Feurer, Melanie & Rueff, Henri & Celio, Enrico & Heinimann, Andreas & Blaser, Juergen & Htun, Aung Myin & Zaehringer, Julie Gwendolin, 2021. "Regional scale mapping of ecosystem services supply, demand, flow and mismatches in Southern Myanmar," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Fleckney, Paul & Bentley, Rebecca, 2021. "The urban public realm and adolescent mental health and wellbeing: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    18. Annisa Pane & Budhi Gunawan & Susanti Withaningsih, 2023. "Development of Kampung Susun Akuarium Based on Sustainable Housing Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Duncan McDuie-Ra, 2013. "Beyond the ‘Exclusionary City’: North-east Migrants in Neo-liberal Delhi," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(8), pages 1625-1640, June.
    20. David W. H. Wong & Harry F. Lee & Simon X. B. Zhao & Andy C. L. Tai, 2022. "Post-2008 Fiscal Stimulus Packages and the Driving Forces for China’s Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:141:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724000863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.