IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v137y2024ics0264837723004386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A conceptual framework for automatic modelling and conflict detection of 3D land-use regulation restrictions to support issuing planning permits

Author

Listed:
  • Emamgholian, Saeid
  • Pouliot, Jacynthe
  • Shojaei, Davood

Abstract

There are a wide variety of Land-use Regulation (LuR) restrictions, ranging from those that need simple 2D spatial analyses to be verified (e.g., area calculation), to those that need complex 3D analyses (e.g., overshadowing and overlooking). Assessing LuR restrictions to automatically detect LuRs’ potential conflicts with physical objects, such as building elements, could be a challenging task in 2D land administration systems relying on 2D drawings and 2D representations, especially when 3D/vertical analyses are required. Land administration systems can include 3D representations of LuR restrictions to identify their impacts on land parcels and vice versa since the LuRs contain legally binding restrictions for all parties including governments and citizens. As part of the transition from the 2D representation of LuR restrictions and manual conflict detection between LuR restrictions and physical objects such as building elements towards a 3D digital representation and automatic conflict detection, this paper proposes a three-stage conceptual framework for automatic 3D modelling and conflict detection of 3D LuR restrictions. The three-stage conceptual framework, as a generic approach, proposes required principles and procedures to automatically (1) model 3D LuR restrictions (called 3D CityLuR), (2) combine them with other sources of information (e.g., zoning maps, 3D city models, and BIM), and (3) detect LuRs’ potential conflicts between the modelled LuRs and physical objects (i.e., proposed/existing building elements). For modelling and verifying 3D LuRs automatically, the framework organises all the required information for IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) as the proposed building, CityGML as the existing buildings, and most importantly, the planning and zoning requirements. It proposes two categories of required information as “level of information need” for (1) modelling and combing 3D CityLuR with other sources of information automatically and (2) automatically detecting potential spatio-semantic conflicts between LuR restrictions and physical objects such as proposed/existing building elements. Based on a case study in Victoria, Australia, 3D LuR restrictions subject to planning approvals and building subdivisions are investigated. The paper concludes with a discussion arguing the feasibility of automating the verification of LuR restrictions to support decision-making in planning permit applications and building subdivisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Emamgholian, Saeid & Pouliot, Jacynthe & Shojaei, Davood, 2024. "A conceptual framework for automatic modelling and conflict detection of 3D land-use regulation restrictions to support issuing planning permits," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:137:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004386
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004386
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barzegar, Maryam & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Atazadeh, Behnam, 2021. "A framework for spatial analysis in 3D urban land administration – A case study for Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Indrajit, Agung & van Loenen, Bastiaan & Suprajaka, & Jaya, Virgo Eresta & Ploeger, Hendrik & Lemmen, Christiaan & van Oosterom, Peter, 2021. "Implementation of the spatial plan information package for improving ease of doing business in Indonesian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Kitsakis, Dimitrios & Kalantari, Mohsen & Rajabifard, Abbas & Atazadeh, Behnam & Dimopoulou, Efi, 2019. "Exploring the 3rd dimension within public law restrictions: A case study of Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 195-206.
    4. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2021. "A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. van Oosterom, Peter & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2020. "3D Land Administration for 3D Land Uses," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Dimitrios Kitsakis & Eftychia Kalogianni & Efi Dimopoulou, 2022. "Public Law Restrictions in the Context of 3D Land Administration—Review on Legal and Technical Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2022. "Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Grgo Dželalija & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Bibliometrics on Public Utilities Registration Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Diana Bobikova & Zofia Kuzevicova & Stefan Kuzevic & Ibrahim Alkhalaf, 2022. "Proposal of a New Approach for Protected Deposit Area Registration in Public Administration Information Systems—A Case Study from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Zhi Zhang & Jenny Paulsson & Jian Gong & Ji’e Huan, 2020. "Legal Framework of Urban Underground Space in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Vladimír Raškovič & Zlatica Muchová & František Petrovič, 2019. "A New Approach to the Registration of Buildings towards 3D Land and Property Management in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Kitsakis, Dimitrios & Dimopoulou, Efi, 2020. "Assessing the environmental impact of 3D public law restrictions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Hossein Komasi & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Olegas Prentkovskis & Paulius Skačkauskas, 2022. "Urban Competitiveness: Identification and Analysis of Sustainable Key Drivers (A Case Study in Iran)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Atazadeh, Behnam & Olfat, Hamed & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Shojaei, Davood & Marjani, Afshin Mesbah, 2021. "Linking Land Administration Domain Model and BIM environment for 3D digital cadastre in multi-storey buildings," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Siham El Yamani & Rafika Hajji & Gilles-Antoine Nys & Mohamed Ettarid & Roland Billen, 2021. "3D Variables Requirements for Property Valuation Modeling Based on the Integration of BIM and CIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Kara, Abdullah & Lemmen, Christiaan & van Oosterom, Peter & Kalogianni, Eftychia & Alattas, Abdullah & Indrajit, Agung, 2024. "Design of the new structure and capabilities of LADM edition II including 3D aspects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Josip Križanović & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Development of a Methodology and Model for Land Administration Data Dissemination Processes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Gkeli, Maria & Potsiou, Chryssy & Ioannidis, Charalabos, 2020. "A technical solution for 3D crowdsourced cadastral surveys," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Mari-Isabella Stan, 2021. "A dynamic image of the final authority act of local public administrations exercised by issuing building permits. Case study: the South-East Development Region of Romania," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 26(1), pages 65-79, Decembrie.
    14. van Oosterom, Peter & Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2022. "The second themed article collection on the land administration domain model (LADM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Chryssy Potsiou & Nikolaos Doulamis & Nikolaos Bakalos & Maria Gkeli & Charalabos Ioannidis & Selena Markouizou, 2022. "A Prototype Machine Learning Tool Aiming to Support 3D Crowdsourced Cadastral Surveying of Self-Made Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Baoshun Wang & Yanfang Liu & Zhaomin Tong & Rui An & Jiwei Xu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamic Characteristics of Land Use Intensity in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas from Urban Underground Space Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2021. "A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Muhammad Sheraz Ahsan & Ejaz Hussain & Zahir Ali & Jaap Zevenbergen & Salman Atif & Mila Koeva & Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Assessing the Status and Challenges of Urban Land Administration Systems Using Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA): A Case Study in Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    19. Jarosław Bydłosz & Agnieszka Bieda, 2020. "Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan & Bennett, Rohan, 2023. "Women’s access to land and the Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Requirements, modelling and assessment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:137:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.