IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v121y2022ics0264837722003647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership

Author

Listed:
  • Guler, Dogus
  • Yomralioglu, Tahsin

Abstract

There is an increasing trend for digitalization because of the developments in Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs). One of the topics that digitalization might be helpful is the building permit issuing that has some drawbacks in terms of the duration of finalization, a large number of documents, and the transparency of processes. Another topic is the need for updating three-dimensional (3D) city models that are beneficial for the effective management of urban areas in the sense of a wide range of subjects such as land-use planning, disaster response, and underground infrastructure monitoring. Apart from these topics, 3D land administration that copes with the ownership problems due to the ever-increasing existence of multilayered buildings in the built environment is gaining importance. Many studies mention that the interrelation among these topics can be advantageous because of exploiting the common digital building models namely Building Information Models (BIMs). It is therefore focused on a research question as follows: Is there a potential for integrating the digital building permit procedures, 3D city model updating, and 3D registration of property ownership as a tripartite cycle? This paper accordingly aims to review the scientific literature on the vision of the tripartite cycle to provide an insight into possible integration among its parts. The methodology contains an elaborate examination of the previous research that is collected from scientific databases and is categorized based on aspects of the tripartite cycle. Following the discussion of the literature, the recommendations are provided in the sense of the vision of the tripartite cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2022. "Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:121:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003647
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722003647
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106337?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Felsberger & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Sustainable Industry 4.0 in Production and Operations Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-39, September.
    2. Grant, Donald & Enemark, Stig & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Mitchell, David & McCamley, Geoffrey, 2020. "The Cadastral triangular model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Cemellini, Barbara & van Oosterom, Peter & Thompson, Rod & de Vries, Marian, 2020. "Design, development and usability testing of an LADM compliant 3D Cadastral prototype system," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Gkeli, Maria & Potsiou, Chryssy & Ioannidis, Charalabos, 2020. "A technical solution for 3D crowdsourced cadastral surveys," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Ghawana, Tarun & Sargent, Jason & Bennett, Rohan Mark & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Khandelwal, Pradeep & Rahman, Subu, 2020. "3D Cadastres in India: Examining the status and potential for land administration and management in Delhi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Knoth, Laura & Atazadeh, Behnam & Rajabifard, Abbas, 2020. "Developing a new framework based on solid models for 3D cadastres," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Sladić, Dubravka & Radulović, Aleksandra & Govedarica, Miro, 2020. "Development of process model for Serbian cadastre," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Kitsakis, Dimitrios & Dimopoulou, Efi, 2020. "Assessing the environmental impact of 3D public law restrictions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Vučić, Nikola & Mađer, Mario & Vranić, Saša & Roić, Miodrag, 2020. "Initial 3D cadastre registration by cadastral resurvey in the Republic of Croatia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Larsson, Karolina & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny, 2020. "Representation of 3D cadastral boundaries - From analogue to digital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Kitsakis, Dimitrios & Kalantari, Mohsen & Rajabifard, Abbas & Atazadeh, Behnam & Dimopoulou, Efi, 2019. "Exploring the 3rd dimension within public law restrictions: A case study of Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 195-206.
    12. Maria Gkeli & Chryssy Potsiou & Charalabos Ioannidis, 2019. "Crowdsourced 3D cadastral surveys: looking towards the next 10 years," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 61-87, March.
    13. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2021. "A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Tekavec, Jernej & Lisec, Anka, 2020. "Cadastral data as a source for 3D indoor modelling," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. van Oosterom, Peter & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2020. "3D Land Administration for 3D Land Uses," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Mohamed El-Mekawy & Anders Östman, 2012. "Feasibility of Building Information Models for 3D Cadastre in Unified City Models," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 1(4), pages 35-58, October.
    17. Griffith-Charles, Charisse & Sutherland, Michael, 2020. "3D cadastres for densely occupied informal situations: Necessity and possibility," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarosław Bydłosz & Agnieszka Bieda, 2020. "Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Atazadeh, Behnam & Olfat, Hamed & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Shojaei, Davood & Marjani, Afshin Mesbah, 2021. "Linking Land Administration Domain Model and BIM environment for 3D digital cadastre in multi-storey buildings," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Josip Križanović & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Development of a Methodology and Model for Land Administration Data Dissemination Processes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Emamgholian, Saeid & Pouliot, Jacynthe & Shojaei, Davood, 2024. "A conceptual framework for automatic modelling and conflict detection of 3D land-use regulation restrictions to support issuing planning permits," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Fatih Döner & Samet Şirin, 2020. "3D Digital Representation of Cadastral Data in Turkey—Apartments Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Chryssy Potsiou & Nikolaos Doulamis & Nikolaos Bakalos & Maria Gkeli & Charalabos Ioannidis & Selena Markouizou, 2022. "A Prototype Machine Learning Tool Aiming to Support 3D Crowdsourced Cadastral Surveying of Self-Made Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Muhammad Sheraz Ahsan & Ejaz Hussain & Zahir Ali & Jaap Zevenbergen & Salman Atif & Mila Koeva & Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Assessing the Status and Challenges of Urban Land Administration Systems Using Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA): A Case Study in Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Grgo Dželalija & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Bibliometrics on Public Utilities Registration Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Kara, Abdullah & Lemmen, Christiaan & van Oosterom, Peter & Kalogianni, Eftychia & Alattas, Abdullah & Indrajit, Agung, 2024. "Design of the new structure and capabilities of LADM edition II including 3D aspects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Gkeli, Maria & Potsiou, Chryssy & Ioannidis, Charalabos, 2020. "A technical solution for 3D crowdsourced cadastral surveys," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Małgorzata Buśko & Jacek Zyga & Ľubica Hudecová & Peter Kyseľ & Monika Balawejder & Michal Apollo, 2022. "Active Collection of Data in the Real Estate Cadastre in Systems with a Different Pedigree and a Different Way of Building Development: Learning from Poland and Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Hicret Gürsoy Sürmeneli & Mila Koeva & Mehmet Alkan, 2022. "The Application Domain Extension (ADE) 4D Cadastral Data Model and Its Application in Turkey," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Sun, Jing & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Tarandi, Väino & Harrie, Lars, 2023. "A BIM-based approach to design a lifecycle 3D property formation process: A Swedish case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    14. Julia Velastegui-Cáceres & Víctor M. Rodríguez-Espinosa & Oswaldo Padilla-Almeida, 2020. "Urban Cadastral Situation in Ecuador: Analysis to Determine the Degree of Proximity of the Cadastral Systems to the 3D Cadastral Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2021. "A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Golob, Peter & Lisec, Anka, 2022. "Success factors in cadastral boundary settlements based on land surveyor’s opinions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Gkeli, Maria & Potsiou, Chryssy, 2023. "3D crowdsourced parametric cadastral mapping: Pathways integrating BIM/IFC, crowdsourced data and LADM," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Zhi Zhang & Jenny Paulsson & Jian Gong & Ji’e Huan, 2020. "Legal Framework of Urban Underground Space in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Vladimír Raškovič & Zlatica Muchová & František Petrovič, 2019. "A New Approach to the Registration of Buildings towards 3D Land and Property Management in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    20. Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:121:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.