IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v134y2023ics0264837723004039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local industrial displacement, zoning conflicts and monozukuri planning in Higashi Osaka, Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Nagao, Kenkichi
  • Edgington, David W.

Abstract

This paper discusses the problems of local industrial displacement by new apartment buildings in a high-density mixed residential and factory zone. Conceptually, we develop a model that underscores the contextual actors and variables shaping the governance of this type of land-use conflict. Empirically, we focus on the Takaida industrial district, Higashi Osaka, Japan. We argue that while there were similarities between our case study and the problems of industrial displacement and land-use and zoning conflicts found in major Western cities, the concerns and planning processes in Takaida reflected a particular Japanese situation. Most notably, decision rules to manage land-use conflicts between residential apartments and factories was overseen initially by a community planning group set up by the Higashi Osaka mayor. Based on field work, we record the twenty-year process to achieve consensus support for formal and informal rules designed to realize juko kyosei, the co-existence of residents and industrial businesses. The community planning group’s proposals were eventually adopted, in large part, by Higashi Osaka city. They were then implemented through a new process of monozukuri planning that combined technological support for local factory upgrading as well as protecting industrial districts from displacement by residential incursion.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagao, Kenkichi & Edgington, David W., 2023. "Local industrial displacement, zoning conflicts and monozukuri planning in Higashi Osaka, Japan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723004039
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004039
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loretta Lees & David Ley, 2008. "Introduction to Special Issue on Gentrification and Public Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2379-2384, November.
    2. David Kucera & William Milberg, 2003. "Deindustrialization and changes in manufacturing trade: Factor content calculations for 1978–1995," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 139(4), pages 601-624, December.
    3. Laura Wolf-Powers & Marc Doussard & Greg Schrock & Charles Heying & Max Eisenburger & Stephen Marotta, 2017. "The Maker Movement and Urban Economic Development," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(4), pages 365-376, October.
    4. Ana Colovic, 2012. "Territorial systems and relocation: Insights from eight cases in Japan," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7-8), pages 589-617, September.
    5. Chris Hamnett & Drew Whitelegg, 2007. "Loft Conversion and Gentrification in London: From Industrial to Postindustrial Land Use," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 106-124, January.
    6. Jessica Ferm & Edward Jones, 2016. "Mixed-use ‘regeneration’ of employment land in the post-industrial city: challenges and realities in London," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1913-1936, October.
    7. Winifred Curran, 2010. "In Defense of Old Industrial Spaces: Manufacturing, Creativity and Innovation in Williamsburg, Brooklyn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 871-885, December.
    8. Kuniko Fujita & Richard Child Hill, 1998. "Industrial Districts and Economic Development in Japan: The Case of Tokyo and Osaka," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 12(2), pages 181-198, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margarida Madaleno & Max Nathan & Henry Overman & Sevrin Waights, 2018. "Incubators, accelerators and regional economic development," CEP Discussion Papers dp1575, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Tanya Tsui & David Peck & Bob Geldermans & Arjan van Timmeren, 2020. "The Role of Urban Manufacturing for a Circular Economy in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Carl Grodach & Liz Taylor & Declan Martin & Joe Hurley, 2023. "Regulating Sustainable Production," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 186-197.
    4. Declan Martin & Carl Grodach, 2023. "RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION IN GENTRIFYING URBAN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS: The Experience of Cultural Manufacturers in San Francisco and Melbourne," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 625-644, July.
    5. Tim Butler, 2007. "Re‐urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 759-781, December.
    6. Antoine Paccoud, 2017. "Buy-to-let gentrification: Extending social change through tenure shifts," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 839-856, April.
    7. Armando J. Garcia Pires & José Pedro Pontes, 2021. "(De)Industrialization, Technology and Transportation," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 527-538, July.
    8. Szymon Marcińczak & Iwona Sagan, 2011. "The Socio-spatial Restructuring of Šódź, Poland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1789-1809, July.
    9. Nathan, Max, 2022. "Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    10. Guillaume Daudin & Sandrine Levasseur, 2005. "Appendix 8 : Measuring the effect of international relocations on French economy," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01073900, HAL.
    11. Mark Davidson, 2008. "Spoiled Mixture: Where Does State-led `Positive' Gentrification End?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2385-2405, November.
    12. Jason S. Spicer, 2020. "Worker and Community Ownership as an Economic Development Strategy: Innovative Rebirth or Tired Retread of a Failed Idea?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(4), pages 325-342, November.
    13. Stefania Fiorentino, 2019. "The Maker Faire of Rome as a window of observation on the new perspectives for local economic development and the new urban entrepreneurial ecosystems," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(4), pages 364-381, June.
    14. Winifred Curran, 2022. "SAYING ‘YES’ TO WHAT?: YIMBY and Urban Redevelopment in Chicago," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 296-300, March.
    15. van Neuss, Leif, 2018. "Globalization and deindustrialization in advanced countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 49-63.
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/693 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:ilo:ilowps:459401 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. David KUCERA & Leanne RONCOLATO, 2011. "Trade liberalization, employment and inequality in India and South Africa," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 150(1-2), pages 1-41, June.
    19. Carl Grodach & Nicole Foster & James Murdoch, 2018. "Gentrification, displacement and the arts: Untangling the relationship between arts industries and place change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 807-825, March.
    20. Rosemary D.F. Bromley & Peter K. Mackie, 2009. "Displacement and the New Spaces for Informal Trade in the Latin American City Centre," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1485-1506, June.
    21. Salone Carlo & Segre Giovanna, 2012. "Culture and Creativity in the Territorial Local Systems. Tales in Search for a Theoretical Scheme," EBLA Working Papers 201201, University of Turin.
    22. Trenessa L. Williams & Charles R. Needham, 2016. "Transformation of a City," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723004039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.