IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v132y2023ics0264837723002880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward constructing an eco-account of cultivated land by quantifying the resources flow and eco-asset transfer in China

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Dan
  • Cao, Yu
  • Wang, Jiayi
  • Fang, Xiaoqian
  • Wu, Qing

Abstract

As an artificial and natural coupling system, cultivated land effectively link the socio-ecosystem by appearing the mixed outcomes from human’s interactions with nature including resource consumption, food security, urban growth, environmental pollution emission, land use change, and developmental policies. However, there still exists many problems that the impacts of human activities on environment are hard to assess and the responsibilities are difficult to allocate when discussing the cultivated land protection, despite the towards constant efforts. This paper tries to construct an eco-account of cultivated land by integrating resources utilization into socio-economic activities, as it indeed provides assistance to practical issues and also is a global trend of environmental-economic accounting. To achieve this, the multi-regional input-output table was used as the important tool that can be considered as the proxy of socio-economic system. The cultivated land is regarded to be embodied and transferred in the economic trade of products and services. We quantify the ecological footprint and ecosystem services flows of cultivated land, build the link between the actual consumption and the physical depletion, and identify the supplier and demander of cultivated land among regions in China. The results show that: 1) The embodied cultivate land in the final consumption presents difference in terms of 31 regions and consumption categories. The developed areas having higher virtual cultivated land consumption and dependence upon others. 2) The north China is mainly the supplier and south is the demander of cultivated land, and the major resources transfer flow is from the north to south and west to east of China. 3) By assessing the eco-value of cultivated land, a revised matrix table containing the account of cultivated land eco-asset transfer for each region is constructed. The framework of this paper can provide aid of assigning responsibilities concerning cultivated land protection and offer a new view to help find a practicable avenue to the eco-compensation or integrated utilization of cultivated land.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Dan & Cao, Yu & Wang, Jiayi & Fang, Xiaoqian & Wu, Qing, 2023. "Toward constructing an eco-account of cultivated land by quantifying the resources flow and eco-asset transfer in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:132:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002880
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723002880
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Bing-Bing & Aggarwal, Rimjhim & Wu, Jianguo & Lv, Ligang, 2021. "Urbanization-associated farmland loss: A macro-micro comparative study in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Heran Zheng & Johannes Többen & Erik Dietzenbacher & Daniel Moran & Jing Meng & Daoping Wang & Dabo Guan, 2022. "Entropy-based Chinese city-level MRIO table framework," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 519-544, October.
    3. Jason Venetoulis & John Talberth, 2008. "Refining the ecological footprint," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 441-469, August.
    4. Franz Hackl & Martin Halla & Gerald J. Pruckner, 2007. "Local compensation payments for agri-environmental externalities: a panel data analysis of bargaining outcomes," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 34(3), pages 295-320, September.
    5. Kunpeng Wang & Minghao Ou & Zinabu Wolde, 2020. "Regional Differences in Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land Protection: An Analysis of Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Bingqin Li, 2018. "Top-down place-based competition and award: local government incentives for non-GDP improvement in China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 397-418, October.
    7. Tim Hayward, 2012. "Climate change and ethics," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 843-848, December.
    8. Shao, Ling & Li, Yuan & Feng, Kuishuang & Meng, Jing & Shan, Yuli & Guan, Dabo, 2018. "Carbon emission imbalances and the structural paths of Chinese regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 396-404.
    9. Erfan Haghighi & Kaveh Madani & Arjen Y. Hoekstra, 2018. "The water footprint of water conservation using shade balls in California," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(7), pages 358-360, July.
    10. Xutong Wu & Bojie Fu & Shuai Wang & Shuang Song & Yingjie Li & Zhenci Xu & Yongping Wei & Jianguo Liu, 2022. "Decoupling of SDGs followed by re-coupling as sustainable development progresses," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 452-459, May.
    11. Peters, Glen P., 2008. "From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 13-23, March.
    12. Qiang, Wenli & Niu, Shuwen & Liu, Aimin & Kastner, Thomas & Bie, Qiang & Wang, Xiang & Cheng, Shengkui, 2020. "Trends in global virtual land trade in relation to agricultural products," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Natasha McDowell, 2002. "Ecological footprint forecasts face sceptical challenge," Nature, Nature, vol. 419(6908), pages 656-656, October.
    14. Yunxiao Bai & Moucheng Liu & Lun Yang, 2021. "Calculation of Ecological Compensation Standards for Arable Land Based on the Value Flow of Support Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Richard B. Bradbury & Stuart H. M. Butchart & Brendan Fisher & Francine M. R. Hughes & Lisa Ingwall-King & Michael A. MacDonald & Jennifer C. Merriman & Kelvin S.-H. Peh & Anne-Sophie Pellier & David , 2021. "The economic consequences of conserving or restoring sites for nature," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 602-608, July.
    16. CAO, Yu & Zou, Jie & Fang, Xiaoqian & Wang, Jiayi & Cao, Yu & Li, Guoyu, 2020. "Effect of land tenure fragmentation on the decision-making and scale of agricultural land transfer in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Yuantao Yang & Shen Qu & Bofeng Cai & Sai Liang & Zhaohua Wang & Jinnan Wang & Ming Xu, 2020. "Mapping global carbon footprint in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    18. Wurtenberger, Laura & Koellner, Thomas & Binder, Claudia R., 2006. "Virtual land use and agricultural trade: Estimating environmental and socio-economic impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 679-697, June.
    19. Rong Tan & Rumei Hu & Arild Vatn, 2021. "What does sustainability demand? An institutionalist analysis with applications to China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 486-514, October.
    20. Hua Li & Dan Su & Yu Cao & Jiayi Wang & Yu Cao, 2022. "Optimizing the Compensation Standard of Cultivated Land Protection Based on Ecosystem Services in the Hangzhou Bay Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    21. Theo Junius & Jan Oosterhaven, 2003. "The Solution of Updating or Regionalizing a Matrix with both Positive and Negative Entries," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 87-96, March.
    22. Jonathan A. Foley & Navin Ramankutty & Kate A. Brauman & Emily S. Cassidy & James S. Gerber & Matt Johnston & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Christine O’Connell & Deepak K. Ray & Paul C. West & Christian Balz, 2011. "Solutions for a cultivated planet," Nature, Nature, vol. 478(7369), pages 337-342, October.
    23. CAO, Yu & Cao, Yu & Li, Guoyu & Tian, Yuhan & Fang, Xiaoqian & Li, Yan & Tan, Yongzhong, 2020. "Linking ecosystem services trade-offs, bundles and hotspot identification with cropland management in the coastal Hangzhou Bay area of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    24. Liao, Xiawei & Zhao, Xu & Liu, Wenfeng & Li, Ruoshui & Wang, Xiaoxi & Wang, Wenpeng & Tillotson, Martin R., 2020. "Comparing water footprint and water scarcity footprint of energy demand in China’s six megacities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    25. Yue Zhao & Feng-ping Wu & Fang Li & Xiang-nan Chen & Xia Xu & Zhi-ying Shao, 2021. "Ecological Compensation Standard of Trans-Boundary River Basin Based on Ecological Spillover Value: A Case Study for the Lancang–Mekong River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liye Wang & Jiwei Xu & Yaolin Liu & Siyu Zhang, 2023. "Spatial Characteristics of the Non-Grain Production Rate of Cropland and Its Driving Factors in Major Grain-Producing Area: Evidence from Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Yang & Junnian Song, 2019. "Depicting Flows of Embodied Water Pollutant Discharge within Production System: Case of an Undeveloped Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Mengyao Han & Shuchang Li, 2021. "Transfer Patterns and Drivers of Embodied Agricultural Land within China: Based on Multi-Regional Decomposition Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Jin, Yi & Behrens, Paul & Tukker, Arnold & Scherer, Laura, 2021. "The energy-water nexus of China’s interprovincial and seasonal electric power transmission," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    4. Giljum, Stefan & Burger, Eva & Hinterberger, Friedrich & Lutter, Stephan & Bruckner, Martin, 2011. "A comprehensive set of resource use indicators from the micro to the macro level," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 300-308.
    5. Antal, Miklós, 2014. "Green goals and full employment: Are they compatible?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 276-286.
    6. Hua Li & Dan Su & Yu Cao & Jiayi Wang & Yu Cao, 2022. "Optimizing the Compensation Standard of Cultivated Land Protection Based on Ecosystem Services in the Hangzhou Bay Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Fabio Monsalve & Mateo Ortiz & María-Ángeles Cadarso & Enrique Gilles & Jorge Zafrilla & Luis-Antonio López, 2020. "Nesting a city input–output table in a multiregional framework: a case example with the city of Bogota," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Xu, Dongxiao & Zhang, Yan & Chen, Bin & Bai, Junhong & Liu, Gengyuan & Zhang, Boyu, 2022. "Identifying the critical paths and sectors for carbon transfers driven by global consumption in 2015," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    9. Xu, Zhongwen & Huang, Liqiao & Liao, Maolin & Xue, Jinjun & Yoshida, Yoshikuni & Long, Yin, 2022. "Quantifying consumption-based carbon emissions of major economic sectors in Japan considering the global value chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 330-341.
    10. Yue Su & Chong Su & Yan Xie & Tan Li & Yongjun Li & Yuanyuan Sun, 2022. "Controlling Non-Grain Production Based on Cultivated Land Multifunction Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Ferng, Jiun-Jiun, 2011. "Measuring and locating footprints: A case study of Taiwan's rice and wheat consumption footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 191-201.
    12. Liu, Xiaoxuan & Yu, Le & Cai, Wenjia & Ding, Qun & Hu, Weixun & Peng, Dailiang & Li, Wei & Zhou, Zheng & Huang, Xiaomeng & Yu, Chaoqing & Gong, Peng, 2021. "The land footprint of the global food trade: Perspectives from a case study of soybeans," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Decun Wu & Jinping Liu, 2016. "Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) Study of the Provincial Ecological Footprints and Domestic Embodied Footprints Traded among China’s 30 Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-31, December.
    14. Kunpeng Wang & Wenjun Wu & Awais Jabbar & Zinabu Wolde & Minghao Ou, 2021. "Dynamic Evolution and Spatial Convergence of the Virtual Cultivated Land Flow Intensity in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Haidi Gao & Alun Gu & Gehua Wang & Fei Teng, 2019. "A Structural Decomposition Analysis of China’s Consumption-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Weidong Xiao & Liquan Qu & Kai Li & Chuanxu Guo & Jie Li, 2022. "An Assessment of the Rational Range of Eco-Compensation Standards: A Case Study in the Nujiang Prefecture, Southwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Bingjiang Luan & Hanshuo Yang & Hong Zou & Xi Yu, 2023. "The impact of the digital economy on inter-city carbon transfer in China using the life cycle assessment model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Zhou, Xiaoyong & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Qunwei & Su, Bin, 2020. "Who shapes China's carbon intensity and how? A demand-side decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Bruckner, Martin & Fischer, Günther & Tramberend, Sylvia & Giljum, Stefan, 2015. "Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 11-21.
    20. Wu, Sanmang & Li, Shantong & Lei, Yalin & Li, Li, 2020. "Temporal changes in China's production and consumption-based CO2 emissions and the factors contributing to changes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:132:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.