IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v120y2022ics0264837722003040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European blue and green infrastructure network strategy vs. the common agricultural policy. Insights from an integrated case study (Couesnon, Brittany)

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas, Houet
  • Gaetan, Palka
  • Roberta, Rigo
  • Hugues, Boussard
  • Jacques, Baudry
  • Xavier, Poux
  • Jean-Baptiste, Narcy
  • Manuel, Alvarez Martinez José
  • Stefano, Balbi
  • Cendrine, Mony
  • Lucie, Lecoq
  • Johanna, Beganton
  • José, Barquin

Abstract

Urbanization and agricultural intensification are the main drivers of biodiversity losses through multiple stressors, especially habitat fragmentation, isolation and loss. Designing Blue and Green Infrastructure Networks (BGIN) has been recommended as a potential tool for land-use planning to increase ecosystem services while preserving biodiversity. All municipalities in France are required to perform BGIN planning. This article focuses on the Couesnon watershed (Brittany, France) and the participatory process used to define and analyze five possible pathways of future land-use and land-cover changes that included implementation of BGINs. Impacts on biodiversity were estimated by quantifying the change in landscape connectivity of woodlands, grasslands and wetlands. The effectiveness of BGIN policies was assessed by comparing current landscape connectivity (2018) to those in possible futures. Landscape connectivity referred to functional connectivity for three indicator species (Abax parallelepipedus, Maniola jurtina and Arvicola sapidus) across three landscape features: woodlands, grasslands and wetlands, respectively. Results allowed impacts of urban and agricultural land-use changes to be identified in terms of extent and quality. If BGIN policies were applied effectively to control the expansion of gray infrastructure, they would help increase the area and the quality of grassland and woodland connectivity by no more than 2%. Agricultural land-use and land-cover changes could have more impact on the extent of grassland (−82% to +38%) and wetland (−49% to +47%) connectivity. Current and future trends for hedgerows implied a decrease in woodland connectivity of 9.8–33.8%. Impacts on the quality of landscape connectivity is not proportional with the extent, as a decrease of the latter can have relatively more negative impacts on the former, and inversely. The study highlights that the BGIN strategy can preserve landscape connectivity effectively in urban ecosystems, where human density is higher, but can be threatened by agricultural intensification.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas, Houet & Gaetan, Palka & Roberta, Rigo & Hugues, Boussard & Jacques, Baudry & Xavier, Poux & Jean-Baptiste, Narcy & Manuel, Alvarez Martinez José & Stefano, Balbi & Cendrine, Mony & Lucie, Leco, 2022. "European blue and green infrastructure network strategy vs. the common agricultural policy. Insights from an integrated case study (Couesnon, Brittany)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:120:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003040
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722003040
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. Houet & C. Marchadier & G. Bretagne & P. Moine & Rahim Aguejdad & Vincent Viguie & M. Bonhomme & A. Lemonsu & P. Avner & Julia Hidalgo & V. Masson, 2016. "Combining narratives and modelling approaches to simulate fine scale and long-term urban growth scenarios for climate adaptation," Post-Print hal-01695084, HAL.
    2. Rega, Carlo & Helming, John & Paracchini, Maria Luisa, 2019. "Environmentalism and localism in agricultural and land-use policies can maintain food production while supporting biodiversity. Findings from simulations of contrasting scenarios in the EU," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Jørgen Primdahl & Lone S. Kristensen, 2016. "Landscape strategy making and landscape characterisation—experiences from Danish experimental planning processes," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 227-238, February.
    4. Delattre, Thomas & Pichancourt, Jean-Baptiste & Burel, Francoise & Kindlmann, Pavel, 2010. "Grassy field margins as potential corridors for butterflies in agricultural landscapes: A simulation study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 370-377.
    5. Anne Mimet & Vincent Pellissier & Thomas Houet & Romain Julliard & Laurent Simon, 2016. "A Holistic Landscape Description Reveals That Landscape Configuration Changes More over Time than Composition: Implications for Landscape Ecology Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiao Zhang & Danqing Li & Shuguang Ning & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Sustainable Urban Green Blue Space (UGBS) and Public Participation: Integrating Multisensory Landscape Perception from Online Reviews," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Kuiper, Jan Jurjen & Carpenter-Urquhart, Liam & Berbés-Blázquez, Marta & Rozas, Elisa Oteros & Fredström, Linna & Psiuk, Kinga & Savu, Codruța & Kautsky, Robert & Guerry, Anne & Carpenter, Stephen R., 2023. "Biosphere Futures: a database of social-ecological scenarios," SocArXiv v4ukj, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła & Joanna Pawłowska-Tyszko & Michał Soliwoda, 2021. "Crop Insurance, Land Productivity and the Environment: A Way forward to a Better Understanding," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Paola Gullino & Maria Gabriella Mellano & Gabriele Loris Beccaro & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2020. "Strategies for the Management of Traditional Chestnut Landscapes in Pesio Valley, Italy: A Participatory Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Simon R. Swaffield & Robert C. Corry & Paul Opdam & Wendy McWilliam & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "Connecting business with the agricultural landscape: business strategies for sustainable rural development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1357-1369, November.
    4. Haiyun Xu & Tobias Plieninger & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "A Systematic Comparison of Cultural and Ecological Landscape Corridors in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-32, February.
    5. Casanova Enault, Laure & Popoff, Tatiana & Debolini, Marta, 2021. "Vacant lands on French Mediterranean coastlines: Inventory, agricultural opportunities, and prospective scenarios," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Yingxue Wang & Jiaheng Du & Jingxing Kuang & Chunxu Chen & Maobiao Li & Jin Wang, 2023. "Two-Scaled Identification of Landscape Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Yunnan–Vietnam Railway (Yunnan Section), China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Levin, Gregor & Jepsen, Martin Rudbeck, 2010. "Abolition of set-aside schemes, associated impacts on habitat structure and modelling of potential effects of cross-farm regulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(22), pages 2728-2737.
    8. Coral, Claudia & Bokelmann, Wolfgang & Bonatti, Michelle & Carcamo, Robert & Sieber, Stefan, 2021. "Understanding institutional change mechanisms for land use: Lessons from Ecuador’s history," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Evans, Luke C. & Sibly, Richard M. & Thorbek, Pernille & Sims, Ian & Oliver, Tom H. & Walters, Richard J., 2019. "Quantifying the effectiveness of agri-environment schemes for a grassland butterfly using individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    10. Spyra, Marcin & La Rosa, Daniele & Zasada, Ingo & Sylla, Marta & Shkaruba, Anton, 2020. "Governance of ecosystem services trade-offs in peri-urban landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    11. Hérivaux, C. & Vinatier, F. & Sabir, M. & Guillot, F. & Rinaudo, J.D., 2021. "Combining narrative scenarios, local knowledge and land-use change modelling for integrating soil erosion in a global perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    12. Kassis, Grâce & Bertrand, Nathalie, 2022. "Institutional changes in farmland governance emerging from a collective land preservation procedure upholding local food projects: Evidence from a French case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Elena Cervelli & Ester Scotto di Perta & Stefania Pindozzi, 2020. "Identification of Marginal Landscapes as Support for Sustainable Development: GIS-Based Analysis and Landscape Metrics Assessment in Southern Italy Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Liudmila Tripolskaja & Asta Kazlauskaite-Jadzevice & Virgilijus Baliuckas & Almantas Razukas, 2021. "Natural and Managed Grasslands Productivity during Multiyear in Ex-Arable Lands (in the Context of Climate Change)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Theano S. Terkenli & Aikaterini Gkoltsiou & Dimitris Kavroudakis, 2021. "The Interplay of Objectivity and Subjectivity in Landscape Character Assessment: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Miho Kamei & Alessio Mastrucci & Bas J. van Ruijven, 2021. "A Future Outlook of Narratives for the Built Environment in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Enrico Gottero, 2021. "Rural Landscape Changes in the Piedmont Region (Italy). A Method for the Interpretation of Possible Effects of CAP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Jørgen Primdahl & Sara Folvig & Lone S. Kristensen, 2020. "Landscape Strategy-Making and Collaboration. The Hills of Northern Mors, Denmark; A Case of Changing Focus and Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:120:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.