IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v109y2021ics0264837721003355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational farm succession: How does gender fit?

Author

Listed:
  • Sheridan, Alison
  • Newsome, Lucie
  • Howard, Tanya
  • Lawson, Andrew
  • Saunders, Skye

Abstract

This article explores gender and intergenerational farm succession, with a particular focus on the Australian context. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of extant research in gender and farm succession patterns internationally, coupled with a systematic sampling of legal databases to see how farm succession has been addressed in the Australian legal system. From the SLR, we established that internationally there are changing roles on farms; proactively addressing succession is recognized as contributing to the ongoing viability of the family farm; gender norms continue to privilege sons and dismiss daughters; and the commitment to maintaining the family farm intact is a priority. From the legal databases we found limited attention has been paid to gender and farm succession in the Australian context. Challenges to legal arrangements for farm succession are usually made on the grounds of unfair distribution of assets between siblings (adequacy of provision) rather than a claim to farm inheritance, and these cases rarely rest on accusations of gender discrimination. We argue that succession disputes are either largely resolved through mediation, or never attempted, as the family farm remaining intact trumps gender in succession planning. Through drawing the SLR and legal cases together, we provide insights for the farm advisory community to better inform future intergenerational farm transfer.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheridan, Alison & Newsome, Lucie & Howard, Tanya & Lawson, Andrew & Saunders, Skye, 2021. "Intergenerational farm succession: How does gender fit?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003355
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721003355
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff Kuehne, 2013. "My decision to sell the family farm," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(2), pages 203-213, June.
    2. Lorraine Balaine, 2019. "Gender and the Preservation of Family Farming in Ireland," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 18(3), pages 33-37, December.
    3. Sarah Fitz-Koch & Mattias Nordqvist & Sara Carter & Erik Hunter, 2018. "Entrepreneurship in the Agricultural Sector: A Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 129-166, January.
    4. Calvin Wang, 2010. "Daughter Exclusion in Family Business Succession: A Review of the Literature," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 475-484, December.
    5. Crockett, Judith, 2004. "The nature of farm succession in three New South Wales communities," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 1, pages 1-13.
    6. Astrachan, Joseph H., 2010. "Strategy in family business: Toward a multidimensional research agenda," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 6-14, March.
    7. Daphna Hacker, 2010. "The Gendered Dimensions of Inheritance: Empirical Food for Legal Thought," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 322-354, June.
    8. Sibabrata Das & Alex Mourmouras & Peter Rangazas, 2018. "Wage and Fertility Gaps in Dual Economies," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Economic Growth and Development, edition 2, chapter 7, pages 191-227, Springer.
    9. Mukhamedova, Nozilakhon & Wegerich, Kai, 2018. "The feminization of agriculture in post-Soviet Tajikistan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 57, pages 128-139.
    10. Barbosa, Roseli Azambuja & Domingues, Carla Heloisa de Faria & Silva, Marcelo Corrêa da & Foguesatto, Cristian Rogério & Pereira, Mariana de Aragão & Gimenes, Régio Marcio Toesca & Borges, João August, 2020. "Using Q-methodology to identify rural women’s viewpoint on succession of family farms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Graeub, Benjamin E. & Chappell, M. Jahi & Wittman, Hannah & Ledermann, Samuel & Kerr, Rachel Bezner & Gemmill-Herren, Barbara, 2016. "The State of Family Farms in the World," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-15.
    12. Berit Brandth, 2019. "Farmers framing fatherhood: everyday life and rural change," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(1), pages 49-59, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiangqiang Zhang & Jiaying Tian & Jie Zheng & Nazir Muhammad Abdullahi & Xuexi Huo, 2022. "How Does Land Tenure Security Affect Farm Succession? Evidence from Apple Growers in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Breitenbach, Raquel & Foguesatto, Cristian Rogério, 2023. "Should I stay or should I go? Gender differences and factors influencing family farm business succession in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Aldrich, Howard E. & Brumana, Mara & Campopiano, Giovanna & Minola, Tommaso, 2021. "Embedded but not asleep: Entrepreneurship and family business research in the 21st century," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1).
    3. Banovic, Marija & Duesberg, Stefanie & Renwick, Alan & Keane, Mark & Bogue, Pat, 2015. "The Field: Land mobility measures as seen through the eyes of Irish farmers," 89th Annual Conference, April 13-15, 2015, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 204200, Agricultural Economics Society.
    4. Heino, Noora & Alimov, Naufal & Tuominen, Pasi, 2024. "Family firm employment behavior during a financial crisis: Does generational stage matter?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    5. Edward Kutsoati & Randall Morck, 2014. "Family Ties, Inheritance Rights, and Successful Poverty Alleviation: Evidence from Ghana," NBER Chapters, in: African Successes, Volume II: Human Capital, pages 215-252, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Luis Bauluz & Yajna Govind & Filip Novokmet, 2020. "Global Land Inequality," PSE Working Papers halshs-03022318, HAL.
    7. Tanja Steiger & Christine Duller & Martin R. W. Hiebl, 2015. "No Consensus in Sight: An Analysis of Ten Years of Family Business Definitions in Empirical Research Studies," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 25-62.
    8. Friedrich Schneider & Mangirdas Morkunas & Erika Quendler, 2021. "Measuring the Immeasurable: The Evolution of the Size of Informal Economy in the Agricultural Sector in the EU-15 up to 2019," CESifo Working Paper Series 8937, CESifo.
    9. Justin R. Hall & Selen Savas-Hall & Eric H. Shaw, 2023. "A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 987-1016, September.
    10. Torres Franco, Nicolás Arturo & Dávalos, Eleonora & Morales, Leonardo Fabio, 2021. "Heterogeneous Effects of Agricultural Technical Assistance in Colombia," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 459-481, November.
    11. Boris Rumanko & Zuzana Lušňáková & Monika Moravanská & Mária Šajbidorová, 2021. "Succession as a Risk Process in the Survival of a Family Business—Case of Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Ayanda Nyambali & Mthunzi Mndela & Tlou Julius Tjelele & Cletos Mapiye & Phillip Evert Strydom & Emiliano Raffrenato & Kennedy Dzama & Voster Muchenje & Ntuthuko Raphael Mkhize, 2022. "Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Economic Viability of Nguni Cattle Fed Diets Containing Graded Levels of Opuntia ficus-indica," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Lude, Maximilian & Prügl, Reinhard, 2021. "Experimental studies in family business research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1).
    14. Anne Jerneck, 2018. "What about Gender in Climate Change? Twelve Feminist Lessons from Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Bövers, Jana & Hoon, Christina, 2021. "Surviving disruptive change: The role of history in aligning strategy and identity in family businesses," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4).
    16. Viviany Moura Chaves & Cecília Rocha & Sávio Marcelino Gomes & Michelle Cristine Medeiros Jacob & João Bosco Araújo da Costa, 2023. "Integrating Family Farming into School Feeding: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Potential Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Herrera, Gabriel Paes & Lourival, Reinaldo & da Costa, Reginaldo Brito & Mendes, Dany Rafael Fonseca & Moreira, Tito Belchior Silva & de Abreu, Urbano Gomes Pinto & Constantino, Michel, 2018. "Econometric analysis of income, productivity and diversification among smallholders in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 455-459.
    18. Maura Pozzi & Carlo Pistoni & Silvio Carlo Ripamonti & Amalia De Leo, 2023. "Generation and Gender Differences in Family Businesses: A New Psychological Perspective," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 919-934, December.
    19. Wouter Broekaert & Petra Andries & Koenraad Debackere, 2016. "Innovation processes in family firms: the relevance of organizational flexibility," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 771-785, October.
    20. Maarten B.T. de Groot & Oli R. Mihalache & Tom Elfring, 2022. "Toward a Theory of Family Social Capital in Wealthy Transgenerational Enterprise Families," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 159-192, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.