IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v86y2024ics0957178723002011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data integration in asset management of municipal pipe networks in Sweden: Challenges, gaps, and potential drivers

Author

Listed:
  • Okwori, E.
  • Viklander, M.
  • Hedström, A.

Abstract

This study involved a survey of Swedish water utilities to evaluate their pipe-network data-collection objectives, usage, storage, and exchange routines. Factors impacting data integration (and the associated benefits) were also identified. Results showed that current data storage and exchange routines can be augmented to support commonly identified objectives and data utilisation needs, especially in larger water utilities. Levels of awareness of the opportunities for and benefits gained through asset management processes and data integration varied between utilities. Further research on the benefits of data integration in pipe network asset management is required to develop an evidence base on benefits accrued in practice, especially considering metadata, the diversity of legacy systems still in operation, costs and policy use.

Suggested Citation

  • Okwori, E. & Viklander, M. & Hedström, A., 2024. "Data integration in asset management of municipal pipe networks in Sweden: Challenges, gaps, and potential drivers," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:86:y:2024:i:c:s0957178723002011
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2023.101689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178723002011
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Almeida, N. & Trindade, M. & Komljenovic, D. & Finger, M., 2022. "A conceptual construct on value for infrastructure asset management," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Cinzia Daraio & Simone Leo & Monica Scannapieco, 2022. "Accounting for quality in data integration systems: a completeness-aware integration approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1465-1490, March.
    3. Heiberger, Richard & Robbins, Naomi, 2014. "Design of Diverging Stacked Bar Charts for Likert Scales and Other Applications," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 57(i05).
    4. Bennich, Amelie & Engwall, Mats & Nilsson, David, 2023. "Operating in the shadowland: Why water utilities fail to manage decaying infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.
    2. George Mastorakis & Ioannis Kopanakis & John Makridis & Christina Chroni & Katerina Synani & Katia Lasaridi & Konstadinos Abeliotis & Ioannis Louloudakis & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Thrassyvoulos Man, 2024. "Managing Household Food Waste with the FoodSaveShare Mobile Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Maria Ghufran & Khurram Iqbal Ahmad Khan & Fahim Ullah & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat, 2022. "Key Enablers of Resilient and Sustainable Construction Supply Chains: A Systems Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Márquez, Luis & Pico, Ricardo & Cantillo, Víctor, 2018. "Understanding captive user behavior in the competition between BRT and motorcycle taxis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Bartkowski, Bartosz, 2017. "Existence value, biodiversity, and the utilitarian dilemma," UFZ Discussion Papers 2/2017, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    6. Cahn, Amir & Katz, David & Ghermandi, Andrea & Prevos, Peter, 2023. "Initiating data-as-a-service adoption in water utilities: A service design approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Blomkvist, Pär & Karpouzoglou, Timos & Nilsson, David & Wallin, Jörgen, 2023. "Entrepreneurship and alignment work in the Swedish water and sanitation sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Dietlmeier, Simon Frederic, 2024. "Industrial Policy for Emerging Technologies: The Case of Narrow AI and the Manufacturing Value Chain as Blueprint for the Industrial Metaverse," MPRA Paper 121183, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Bennich, Amelie, 2024. "The digital imperative: Institutional pressures to digitalise," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Amelia A. McNamara, 2019. "Community engagement and subgroup meta-knowledge: some factors in the soul of a community," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1511-1535, December.
    11. Evelyn Eika & Frode Eika Sandnes, 2022. "Starstruck by journal prestige and citation counts? On students’ bias and perceptions of trustworthiness according to clues in publication references," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6363-6390, November.
    12. Abdullatif A. AlMunifi & Mohammed S. Alfawzan, 2023. "Back to the New Normal in Engineering Education towards Student-Centered Learning: Remote? In Person? Hybrid?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Pickle, Linda Williams & Pearson, James B. & Carr, Daniel B., 2015. "micromapST: Exploring and Communicating Geospatial Patterns in US State Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i03).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:86:y:2024:i:c:s0957178723002011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.