IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13510-d1236476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Back to the New Normal in Engineering Education towards Student-Centered Learning: Remote? In Person? Hybrid?

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullatif A. AlMunifi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Unaizah 56452, Saudi Arabia
    Faculty of Engineering, Sana’a University, Sana’a PO Box 1247, Yemen)

  • Mohammed S. Alfawzan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Unaizah 56452, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Academic institutions are back to normal, but what about students? What were the cultural and lifestyle changes and impacts due to the remote mode of learning? Classes in Saudi universities in the pre-pandemic time were predominantly 100% face to face. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the education sector moved to 100% online and then went through hybrid mode (a mixture of face to face and remote) until the return to the old normal, i.e., 100% in person. Students in the post-pandemic period are wondering “Why are we coming to campus? What is the value in this teaching and learning experience where we have to commute daily?” This research addresses students’ concerns and questions, and it addresses the following questions: to what extent do they prefer learning remotely? In person? Hybrid? Observations and discussions preceded the design of the research instruments. A questionnaire survey that consists of closed-ended and open-ended questions was distributed and received responses from 74 engineering students, at the Qassim University, who were in the last three semesters of their studies and who went through the three modes of learning. To complement the quantitative research and to achieve a better understanding of matters that were revealed through the survey, the results of the analysis were shared through three focus group sessions with students and faculty members. The findings from this mixed methods approach revealed that the hybrid mode of learning is gaining significant preference among students and partial support from the teaching staff. On the other hand, unfavorable perceptions were expressed towards both going back to the old normal or the transition to a completely remote mode of learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullatif A. AlMunifi & Mohammed S. Alfawzan, 2023. "Back to the New Normal in Engineering Education towards Student-Centered Learning: Remote? In Person? Hybrid?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13510-:d:1236476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13510/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13510/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sujeewa Hettiarachchi & BWR Damayanthi & Shirantha Heenkenda & DMSLB Dissanayake & Manjula Ranagalage & Lalith Ananda, 2021. "Student Satisfaction with Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study at State Universities in Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Fatima Riaz & Syed Esam Mahmood & Tahmina Begum & Mohammad Tauheed Ahmad & Ayoub A. Al-Shaikh & Ausaf Ahmad & Ayed A. Shati & Mohammad Suhail Khan, 2023. "Students’ Preferences and Perceptions Regarding Online versus Offline Teaching and Learning Post-COVID-19 Lockdown," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Heiberger, Richard & Robbins, Naomi, 2014. "Design of Diverging Stacked Bar Charts for Likert Scales and Other Applications," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 57(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.
    2. George Mastorakis & Ioannis Kopanakis & John Makridis & Christina Chroni & Katerina Synani & Katia Lasaridi & Konstadinos Abeliotis & Ioannis Louloudakis & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Thrassyvoulos Man, 2024. "Managing Household Food Waste with the FoodSaveShare Mobile Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Maria Ghufran & Khurram Iqbal Ahmad Khan & Fahim Ullah & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat, 2022. "Key Enablers of Resilient and Sustainable Construction Supply Chains: A Systems Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Lui-Kwan Ng & Chung-Kwan Lo, 2022. "Flipped Classroom and Gamification Approach: Its Impact on Performance and Academic Commitment on Sustainable Learning in Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Annchen Mielmann, 2021. "Being Innovative in Running an Online Food Research Project in Consumer Sciences during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Márquez, Luis & Pico, Ricardo & Cantillo, Víctor, 2018. "Understanding captive user behavior in the competition between BRT and motorcycle taxis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Nóra Gombkötő & Iveta Štempeľová & Ondrej Takáč, 2024. "Evaluating Sustainable Online Education: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of IT Device Utilization among Slovakian and Hungarian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-27, January.
    8. Bartkowski, Bartosz, 2017. "Existence value, biodiversity, and the utilitarian dilemma," UFZ Discussion Papers 2/2017, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    9. Dietlmeier, Simon Frederic, 2024. "Industrial Policy for Emerging Technologies: The Case of Narrow AI and the Manufacturing Value Chain as Blueprint for the Industrial Metaverse," MPRA Paper 121183, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Okwori, E. & Viklander, M. & Hedström, A., 2024. "Data integration in asset management of municipal pipe networks in Sweden: Challenges, gaps, and potential drivers," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Amelia A. McNamara, 2019. "Community engagement and subgroup meta-knowledge: some factors in the soul of a community," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1511-1535, December.
    12. Evelyn Eika & Frode Eika Sandnes, 2022. "Starstruck by journal prestige and citation counts? On students’ bias and perceptions of trustworthiness according to clues in publication references," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6363-6390, November.
    13. Pickle, Linda Williams & Pearson, James B. & Carr, Daniel B., 2015. "micromapST: Exploring and Communicating Geospatial Patterns in US State Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i03).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13510-:d:1236476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.