IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v72y2021ics0957178721001004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Malaysia’s electricity market structure in transition

Author

Listed:
  • Sibeperegasam, Mahesvaran
  • Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna Kumaran
  • Walker, Sara
  • Kanesan, Jeevan

Abstract

The Malaysian electricity industry evolved from a vertically integrated utility into a single-buyer model, which considered a precursor to deregulation and a competitive market. This study considers electricity sector reform in Malaysia and proposes a market structure for the industry. We focus on the single-buyer model and the pool model for the analysis with the recommendation on reform stages required to ensure a smooth and successful market transition. A smooth transition from regulated market into deregulated market will ensure market stability and sustainability of the energy market. It will also provide enough time for the market participants to adapt and transit from regulated to deregulated energy market.

Suggested Citation

  • Sibeperegasam, Mahesvaran & Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna Kumaran & Walker, Sara & Kanesan, Jeevan, 2021. "Malaysia’s electricity market structure in transition," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:72:y:2021:i:c:s0957178721001004
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2021.101266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178721001004
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., 2008. "Competitive Electricity Markets: Questions Remain about Design, Implementation, Performance," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 74-87, March.
    2. David M. Newbery, 2005. "Electricity liberalization in Britain: The quest for a satisfactory wholesale market design," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 43-70.
    3. Letova, Ksenia & Yao, Rui & Davidson, Mikhail & Afanasyeva, Ekaterina, 2018. "A review of electricity markets and reforms in Russia," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 84-93.
    4. Paul L. Joskow, 2008. "Lessons Learned From Electricity Market Liberalization," The Energy Journal, , vol. 29(2_suppl), pages 9-42, December.
    5. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., 2006. "Electricity market reform: What has the experience taught us thus far?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 63-75, June.
    6. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., 2006. "Electricity Market Reform: What Have We Learned? What Have We Gained?," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(9), pages 70-83, November.
    7. Laszlo Lovei, 2000. "The Single-Buyer Model : A Dangerous Path toward Competitive Electricity Markets," World Bank Publications - Reports 11409, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schuch, Esther & Apergi, Maria & Chow, Deborah Yik Kuen & Eicke, Laima & Goldthau, Andreas & Kurniawan, Jude H. & Lima-de-Oliveira, Renato & Tan, Zhai Gen & Weko, Silvia, 2024. "Breaking the carbon lock-in: Identifying pathways for Malaysia towards a low-carbon future," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Muhammad Mutasim Billah Tufail & Maawra Salam & Muhammad Shakeel & Ali Gohar, 2022. "Diversified Sustainable Resource Availability by Optimizing Economic Environmental and Supply Risk factors in Malaysia s Power Generation Mix," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 507-516.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2010. "Electricity Market Reform: Lessons for developing countries," MPRA Paper 27317, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Gaffney, F. & Deane, J.P. & Gallachóir, B.P.Ó, 2017. "A 100 year review of electricity policy in Ireland (1916–2015)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 67-79.
    3. Weigt, Hannes, 2009. "A Review of Liberalization and Modeling of Electricity Markets," MPRA Paper 65651, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Carlos Suarez, 2021. "Private management and strategic bidding behavior in electricity markets: Evidence from Colombia," IREA Working Papers 202102, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jan 2021.
    5. Sherzod N. Tashpulatov, 2018. "The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Mukherjee, Shilpi & Dhingra, Tarun & Sengupta, Anirban, 2017. "Status of Electricity Act, 2003: A systematic review of literature," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 237-248.
    7. Cheng, Chuntian & Chen, Fu & Li, Gang & Ristić, Bora & Mirchi, Ali & Qiyu, Tu & Madani, Kaveh, 2018. "Reform and renewables in China: The architecture of Yunnan's hydropower dominated electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 682-693.
    8. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2014. "Investment, security of supply and sustainability in the aftermath of three decades of power sector reform," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Suarez, Carlos, 2022. "Private management and strategic bidding behavior in electricity markets: Evidence from Colombia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    10. André Quites Ordovás Santos & Adriel Rodrigues da Silva & Jorge Javier Gimenez Ledesma & Adriano Batista de Almeida & Marco Roberto Cavallari & Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior, 2021. "Electricity Market in Brazil: A Critical Review on the Ongoing Reform," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Michael G. Pollitt, 2019. "The European Single Market in Electricity: An Economic Assessment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 55(1), pages 63-87, August.
    12. Heffron, Raphael J. & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Sumarno, Theresia & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2022. "How different electricity pricing systems affect the energy trilemma: Assessing Indonesia's electricity market transition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    13. Tooraj Jamasb & Rabindra Nepal & Govinda R. Timilsina, 2017. "A Quarter Century Effort Yet to Come of Age: A Survey of Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    14. She, Zhen-Yu & Meng, Gang & Xie, Bai-Chen & O'Neill, Eoghan, 2020. "The effectiveness of the unbundling reform in China’s power system from a dynamic efficiency perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    15. Pollitt, M. & Dale, L., 2018. "Restructuring the Chinese Electricity Supply Sector - How industrial electricity prices are determined in a liberalized power market: lessons from Great Britain," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1871, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    16. Gencer, Busra & Larsen, Erik Reimer & van Ackere, Ann, 2020. "Understanding the coevolution of electricity markets and regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Štefan Bojnec & Alan Križaj, 2021. "Electricity Markets during the Liberalization: The Case of a European Union Country," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Nepal, Rabindra & Phoumin, Han & Musibau, Hammed & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2022. "The socio-economic impacts of energy policy reform through the lens of the power sector – Does cross-sectional dependence matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Arina Nikandrova & Jevgenijs Steinbuks, 2017. "Contracting for the second best in dysfunctional electricity markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 41-71, February.
    20. Gal, Nurit & Milstein, Irena & Tishler, Asher & Woo, C.K., 2017. "Fuel cost uncertainty, capacity investment and price in a competitive electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 233-240.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:72:y:2021:i:c:s0957178721001004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.