IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v88y2024ics0301420723011534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving mineral mining enterprises environmental performance through corporate social responsibility practices in China: Implications for minerals policymaking

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Li
  • Wang, Qianyun

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility of mineral mining sector enterprises is greatly important to understand due to its significant role in the social and environmental footprint of the country. Over the years, the natural resources development sector, especially the mineral mining industry, has shown tremendous growth. Although it brought significant profitability for the enterprise as well as a great contribution to economic growth, However, its social and environmental impacts brought serious challenges for the global community. Therefore, scholars and practitioners in the natural resources management sector, especially the mineral mining sector, call for the importance of corporate social responsibility for enterprises to minimize their social and environmental impact. However, in the context of the mineral mining sector, it is unclear whether corporate social responsibility practices (i.e., environmental conservation, waste reduction and sustainability initiatives) attract stakeholders to participate in corporate social activities and how to improve the environmental performance of mineral mining enterprises. Keeping in mind the limitations of existing research, this paper aims to study the corporate social responsibility and environmental performance of mineral mining firms. In addition, the study incorporates the role of stakeholder engagement as a mediator, which opens a new path for the effective implementation of corporate social responsibility. The study adopted a survey method for data collection, and data was collected from 227 managers that were utilized in this study. The data collected from managers of mineral mining companies was utilized, and we employed structural equation modeling techniques to find robust results. The findings reveal that environmental conservation and waste reduction strategies under the framework of corporate social responsibility directly not influence the environmental performance of the enterprises. However, stakeholder engagement serves as bridge among environmental conservation, waste reduction strategies and environmental performance of the mineral mining enterprises. Whereas sustainability initiative could directly improve environmental performance. The findings of the study provide important insights for mineral policy formulation and managerial decision making to foster environmental performance of mineral mining enterprises in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Li & Wang, Qianyun, 2024. "Improving mineral mining enterprises environmental performance through corporate social responsibility practices in China: Implications for minerals policymaking," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723011534
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723011534
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Bakker, Frank G.A. & Rasche, Andreas & Ponte, Stefano, 2019. "Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives on Sustainability: A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda for Business Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 343-383, July.
    2. George Halkos & Steriani Matsiori & Sophoklis Dritsas, 2019. "Stakeholder engagement for sustainable development and their suggestions for environmental policy: The case of Mediterranean monk seal," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 461-473, May.
    3. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Katia Furlotti, 2020. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 470-484, March.
    4. Ping-Kuo Chen & Itziar Lujan-Blanco & Jordi Fortuny-Santos & Patxi Ruiz-de-Arbulo-López, 2020. "Lean Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability: The Effects of Employee Involvement, Stakeholder Pressure and ISO 14001," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Kui Wang & Shuang Tao, 2023. "Why Do Chinese Private Enterprises Seek Outward Foreign Direct Investment?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(4), pages 200-218, July.
    6. Hannah Jun & Minseok Kim, 2021. "From Stakeholder Communication to Engagement for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Case Study of LG Electronics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    7. McNicholas, Grace & Cotton, Matthew, 2019. "Stakeholder perceptions of marine plastic waste management in the United Kingdom," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 77-87.
    8. Ye Sang & Eunkyoung Han, 2023. "A win‐win way for corporate and stakeholders to achieve sustainable development: Corporate social responsibility value co‐creation scale development and validation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1177-1190, May.
    9. Giovanna Attanasio & Nadia Preghenella & Alberto Felice De Toni & Cinzia Battistella, 2022. "Stakeholder engagement in business models for sustainability: The stakeholder value flow model for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 860-874, March.
    10. Daniel Mercado-Garcia & Thomas Block & Jheni Thalis Horna Cotrina & Nilton Deza Arroyo & Marie Anne Eurie Forio & Guido Wyseure & Peter Goethals, 2023. "Freshwater Management Discourses in the Northern Peruvian Andes: The Watershed-Scale Complexity for Integrating Mining, Rural, and Urban Stakeholders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Huang, Xiao & Huang, Shoujun & Shui, Ailun, 2021. "Government spending and intergenerational income mobility: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 387-414.
    12. Douglas A. Adu & Basil Al‐Najjar & Thitima Sitthipongpanich, 2022. "Executive compensation, environmental performance, and sustainable banking: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1439-1463, May.
    13. Bilal Afsar & Waheed Ali Umrani, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and pro‐environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 109-125, January.
    14. Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Anil Kumar & Arvind Upadhyay, 2023. "How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 551-569, January.
    15. Quan‐Hoang Vuong & Viet‐Phuong La & Hong‐Kong T. Nguyen & Manh‐Tung Ho & Thu‐Trang Vuong & Manh‐Toan Ho, 2021. "Identifying the moral–practical gaps in corporate social responsibility missions of Vietnamese firms: An event‐based analysis of sustainability feasibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 30-41, January.
    16. Thorey S Thorisdottir & Lara Johannsdottir, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Influencing Sustainability within the Fashion Industry. A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-64, November.
    17. Edilson Bacinello & Gérson Tontini & Anete Alberton, 2020. "Influence of maturity on corporate social responsibility and sustainable innovation in business performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 749-759, March.
    18. Fang, Ming & Chang, Chiu-Lan, 2023. "The role of COP26 commitment and technological innovation in depletion of natural resources: Evidence from BRICS countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Adam Arian & John Sands & Stuart Tooley, 2023. "Industry and Stakeholder Impacts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Financial Performance: Consumer vs. Industrial Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Upadhyay, Arvind & Laing, Tim & Kumar, Vikas & Dora, Manoj, 2021. "Exploring barriers and drivers to the implementation of circular economy practices in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    21. Javier Amores‐Salvadó & Gregorio Martin‐de Castro & Elisabeth Albertini, 2023. "Walking the talk, but above all, talking the walk: Looking green for market stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 431-442, January.
    22. Giorgos Papagiannakis & Irini Voudouris & Spyros Lioukas & George Kassinis, 2019. "Environmental management systems and environmental product innovation: The role of stakeholder engagement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 939-950, September.
    23. Xuan Liu & Tianyi Shi & Guohui Zhou & Mingzhe Liu & Zhengtong Yin & Lirong Yin & Wenfeng Zheng, 2023. "Emotion classification for short texts: an improved multi-label method," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    24. Jintao Lu & Mengshang Liang & Chong Zhang & Dan Rong & Hailing Guan & Kristina Mazeikaite & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 686-703, March.
    25. Alves, Wellington & Ferreira, Paula & Araújo, Madalena, 2021. "Challenges and pathways for Brazilian mining sustainability," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    26. Waqar Ahmed & Muhammad Saeed Ashraf & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Simonov Kusi-Sarpong & Francis Kow Arhin & Horsten Kusi-Sarpong & Arsalan Najmi, 2020. "Analyzing the impact of environmental collaboration among supply chain stakeholders on a firm’s sustainable performance," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 4-21, June.
    27. Gao, Huasheng & Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Li, Kai & Zhang, Jin, 2020. "The Real Effect of Smoking Bans: Evidence from Corporate Innovation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(2), pages 387-427, March.
    28. Daniela M. Salvioni & Alex Almici, 2020. "Transitioning Toward a Circular Economy: The Impact of Stakeholder Engagement on Sustainability Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Zhiyong & Wu, Yanhong & Xie, Qinghua, 2024. "Social responsibility, information technology, and high-quality development of mining enterprise using structural equation modeling (SEM)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, He & Zhang, Chunguang, 2024. "Economic policy uncertainty and natural resources commodity prices: A comparative analysis of pre- and post-pandemic quantile trends in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Zeeshan Ullah & Ahmad Arslan & Vesa Puhakka, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility strategy, sustainable product attributes, and export performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1840-1853, November.
    3. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Adnan Ahmed Sheikh & Mubeen Ashraf & Zhang Yu, 2022. "Improving Consumer-Based Green Brand Equity: The Role of Healthy Green Practices, Green Brand Attachment, and Green Skepticism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Zeeshan Ullah & Ahmad Arslan, 2022. "R&D contribution to sustainable product attributes development: The complementarity of human capital," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 902-915, October.
    5. Lingfu Kong & Emrah Sofuoğlu & Balogun Daud Ishola & Shujaat Abbas & Qingran Guo & Khurshid Khudoykulov, 2024. "Sustainable development through structural transformation: a pathway to economic, social, and environmental progress," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-34, April.
    6. Gabriela Almeida Marcon Nora & Anete Alberton & Diego Hernando Florez Ayala, 2023. "Stakeholder theory and actor‐network theory: The stakeholder engagement in energy transitions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 673-685, January.
    7. Celina Bade & Alexandra Olsacher & Philip Boehme & Hubert Truebel & Lena Bürger & Leonard Fehring, 2024. "Sustainability in the pharmaceutical industry—An assessment of sustainability maturity and effects of sustainability measure implementation on supply chain security," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 224-242, January.
    8. Yu, Mengyan & Umair, Muhammad & Oskenbayev, Yessengali & Karabayeva, Zhаnsaya, 2023. "Exploring the nexus between monetary uncertainty and volatility in global crude oil: A contemporary approach of regime-switching," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    9. Li, Yongbo & Barrueta Pinto, Mark Christhian & Kumar, D. Thresh, 2023. "Analyzing sustainability indicator for Chinese mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Samuele Maccioni & Francesca d’Angella & Manuela De Carlo & Bruno Sfogliarini, 2024. "Stakeholder Engagement and Triggers for Sustainable Development in Complex Fragile Ecosystems: Evidence from Alpine Trentino Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-27, November.
    11. Zeeshan Ullah, 2021. "Sustainable product attributes and firm performance: The moderating role of marketing resource intensity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4107-4120, December.
    12. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Adriano Cordisco & Riccardo Melloni & Lucia Botti, 2022. "Sustainable Circular Economy for the Integration of Disadvantaged People: A Preliminary Study on the Reuse of Lithium-Ion Batteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Hongyi Mao & Zongjun Wang & Lin Yi, 2021. "Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Lead to Successful Sustainable Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese Environmentally Friendly Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Lan Guo & Ling Yang, 2023. "The Corporate Economic Influence and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2020. "Book Review of Alexandros Gasparatos and Katherine J. Willis. Biodiversity in the Green Economy. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2015. Version 1," OSF Preprints 3xhrg, Center for Open Science.
    17. Yuemei Ding & Dequan Zheng & Xiaoyu Niu, 2023. "Collaborative Green Innovation of Livestock Product Three-Level Supply Chain Traceability System: A Value Co-Creation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, December.
    18. Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro & J. Alfredo Flores‐Hernández & Lourdes Pérez & Guadalupe Valera‐Blanes, 2020. "CSR and branding in emerging economies: The effect of incomes and education," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2765-2776, November.
    19. Ho, Manh-Toan, 2021. "Video games and scientific research," OSF Preprints cj593, Center for Open Science.
    20. Héloïse Berkowitz & Nils Brunsson & Michael Grothe-Hammer & Mikaela Sundberg & Bertrand Valiorgue, 2022. "Meta-Organizations: A Clarification and a Way Forward," Post-Print hal-03685386, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723011534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.