IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v84y2023ics0301420723004336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimum thresholds of key ecological attributes facilitate the tracking of mineland restoration

Author

Listed:
  • Castro, Arianne Flexa de
  • Assis, Igor Rodrigues de
  • Caldeira, Cecílio Frois
  • Ramos, Silvio Junio
  • Coelho, Renan Rodrigues
  • Oliveira, Guilherme Corrêa de
  • Medeiros-Sarmento, Priscila Sanjuan
  • Gastauer, Markus

Abstract

The restitution of biodiversity and ecosystem services to premining levels requires long time periods. This paper proposes quantifiable criteria to classify minelands as minimally restored compatible with (pluri)annual corporate budget cycles, reducing the probability of the need for future interventions. For that, we reviewed the scientific literature for key ecological attributes and outlined time frames necessary for compliance with these criteria based on iron mines from Brazil. For minimum restoration, principal soil functions should be initially reestablished and the vegetation cover should be dominated by native zoochoric and animal-pollinated plant species to guarantee connectivity with neighboring areas. Furthermore, areas should be free from the risk of future degradation, and minimum ecosystem functions such as photosynthesis, atmospheric nitrogen fixation, and litter formation should take place in these sites. In accordance with the available literature, we propose response ratios larger than 20% compared to restoration targets for all quantitative environmental indicators to qualify an area as minimally restored. Data from real-world cases show that these criteria can be met in iron minelands after short periods of restoration. Thus, the definition of interim results of the restoration process enables to cope with corporate budget cycles. However, further studies are necessary to outline how minimum restoration standards can be defined for further ores or tailings, and whether compliance with minimum restoration standards in fact promotes successional processes and further development toward restoration targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Castro, Arianne Flexa de & Assis, Igor Rodrigues de & Caldeira, Cecílio Frois & Ramos, Silvio Junio & Coelho, Renan Rodrigues & Oliveira, Guilherme Corrêa de & Medeiros-Sarmento, Priscila Sanjuan & Ga, 2023. "Minimum thresholds of key ecological attributes facilitate the tracking of mineland restoration," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:84:y:2023:i:c:s0301420723004336
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723004336
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ossa-Moreno, Juan & McIntyre, Neil & Ali, Saleem & Smart, James C.R. & Rivera, Diego & Lall, Upmanu & Keir, Greg, 2018. "The Hydro-economics of Mining," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 368-379.
    2. Peter J Carrick & Katherine J Forsythe, 2020. "The species composition—ecosystem function relationship: A global meta-analysis using data from intact and recovering ecosystems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Peck, Philip & Sinding, Knud, 2009. "Financial assurance and mine closure: Stakeholder expectations and effects on operating decisions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 227-233, December.
    4. Moisés Méndez-Toribio & Cristina Martínez-Garza & Eliane Ceccon, 2021. "Challenges during the execution, results, and monitoring phases of ecological restoration: Learning from a country-wide assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Renato Crouzeilles & Michael Curran & Mariana S. Ferreira & David B. Lindenmayer & Carlos E. V. Grelle & José M. Rey Benayas, 2016. "A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Islam, Asif & Hyland, Marie, 2019. "The drivers and impacts of water infrastructure reliability – a global analysis of manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 143-157.
    2. Cao, Jianjun & Wei, Chen & Adamowski, Jan F. & Zhou, Junju & Liu, Chunfang & Zhu, Guofeng & Dong, Xiaogang & Zhang, Xiaofang & Zhao, Huijun & Feng, Qi, 2020. "Could arid and semi-arid abandoned lands prove ecologically or economically valuable if they afford greater soil organic carbon storage than afforested lands in China’s Loess Plateau?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Ronyastra, I Made & Saw, Lip Huat & Low, Foon Siang, 2023. "A review of methods for integrating risk management and multicriteria decision analysis in financial feasibility for post-coal-mining land usage selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    4. Cornelie Crous & John R. Owen & Lochner Marais & Samkelisiwe Khanyile & Deanna Kemp, 2021. "Public disclosure of mine closures by listed South African mining companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1032-1042, May.
    5. Sara Aghakazemjourabbaf & Margaret Insley, 2018. "Optimal timing of harzardous waste clean-up under an environmental bond an a strict liability rule," Working Papers 1803, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised 06 Jan 2018.
    6. Changjun Gu & Pei Zhao & Qiong Chen & Shicheng Li & Lanhui Li & Linshan Liu & Yili Zhang, 2020. "Forest Cover Change and the Effectiveness of Protected Areas in the Himalaya since 1998," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Gregory, Gillian H., 2021. "Rendering mine closure governable and constraints to inclusive development in the Andean region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Araya, Natalia & Ramírez, Yendery & Cisternas, Luis A. & Kraslawski, Andrzej, 2021. "Use of real options to enhance water-energy nexus in mine tailings management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    9. Bong Soon Lim & Jaewon Seol & A Reum Kim & Ji Hong An & Chi Hong Lim & Chang Seok Lee, 2022. "Succession of the Abandoned Rice Fields Restores the Riparian Forest," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Tamba, Yvonne & Wafula, Joshua & Whitney, Cory & Luedeling, Eike & Yigzaw, Negusse & Negussie, Aklilu & Muchiri, Caroline & Gebru, Yemane & Shepherd, Keith & Aynekulu, Ermias, 2021. "Stochastic simulation of restoration outcomes for a dry afromontane forest landscape in northern Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Yang, Peifang & Davis, Graham A., 2021. "Why don't environmental bonds fully cover reclamation costs?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Cristina Martínez-Garza & Eliane Ceccon & Moisés Méndez-Toribio, 2022. "Ecological and Social Limitations for Mexican Dry Forest Restoration: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Allison B. Simler-Williamson & Matthew J. Germino, 2022. "Statistical considerations of nonrandom treatment applications reveal region-wide benefits of widespread post-fire restoration action," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Aghakazemjourabbaf, Sara & Insley, Margaret, 2021. "Leaving your tailings behind: Environmental bonds, bankruptcy and waste cleanup," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    15. Murendeni Kwinda & Stefan John Siebert & Helga Van Coller & Tlou Samuel Masehela, 2024. "Identifying Plant Functional Traits of Weeds in Fields Planted with Glyphosate-Tolerant Maize for Preferable Weed Management Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Crispin Cunya, Marianella & Ponce Oliva, Roberto Daniel & Rendon Schneir, Eric & Arias Montevechio, Esteban Eduardo, 2023. "Modelamiento hidro-económico de los efectos del cambio climático y política en la agricultura andina," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 23(01), June.
    17. Huyen Thi Le & Janet Xuanli Liao & Christopher J. Spray, 2021. "Decommissioning Planning of Offshore Oil and Gas Fields in Vietnam: What Can be Learnt from Mine Closure Planning in Scotland?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 162-174.
    18. Ali, Danish & Ur Rehman, Atta, 2020. "Adoption of autonomous mining system in Pakistan – Policy, skillset, awareness and preparedness of stakeholders," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Collins, Benjamin C. & Kumral, Mustafa, 2020. "Game theory for analyzing and improving environmental management in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Stella Manes & Igor Rodrigues Henud & Kenny Tanizaki-Fonseca, 2022. "Climate change mitigation potential of Atlantic Forest reforestations," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:84:y:2023:i:c:s0301420723004336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.