IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v77y2022ics0301420722001180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fast method to develop an optimal operational sublevel stope design

Author

Listed:
  • Morales, Nelson
  • Mancilla, Diego
  • Miranda, Roberto
  • Vallejos, Javier

Abstract

Designing a sublevel stoping mine is a challenging task that requires determining the best layout in terms of economic value while respecting geomechanical constraints that limit the stopes' shape. Because of its relevance and challenging aspects, many authors have proposed methods to approximate or compute optimal stope designs or to provide raw designs that can be used as a guideline. This paper follows previous approaches by approximating the shape of the stopes using the block model as support and working in two stages: first, an enumeration algorithm generates all valid stopes, and second, an optimization model selects the set of stopes with maximum value. However, our approach adds several improvements. Firstly, we ensure that the stopes generated in the first stage are profitable and geotechnically stable. Secondly, the mathematical model of the second stage incorporates the organization of stopes into drifts and levels, which yields a more operational layout. Thirdly, the approach is suitable for algorithmic and theoretical contributions: We propose a fast heuristic algorithm for the general case of the model but also show that in some cases, the optimization problem reduces to finding the shortest path in an ad-hoc graph; thus, its optimum can be computed efficiently. Fourthly, we test our approach on 4 block models involving 84,000 to over 3 million blocks, or about 53,000 to 13.5 million valid stopes, respectively. The resulting optimal layouts are not only operationally feasible, but optimal solutions can be found in less than 1 h using freely available linear programming solvers or in less than a second using a shortest-path algorithm when it applies. Finally, we performed sensibility analyses to assess the variability of the value and geometric location of optimal stopes showing that the solutions are robust and that even with perturbations of 20% in the economic values of the stopes, the value and tonnage of the optimal solutions do not change more than 0.4% and that in most cases, 95% of the extracted blocks remain the same.

Suggested Citation

  • Morales, Nelson & Mancilla, Diego & Miranda, Roberto & Vallejos, Javier, 2022. "A fast method to develop an optimal operational sublevel stope design," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:77:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722001180
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420722001180
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikbin, V. & Ataee-pour, M. & Shahriar, K. & Pourrahimian, Y. & MirHassani, S.A., 2019. "Stope boundary optimization: A mathematical model and efficient heuristics," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 515-526.
    2. O’Sullivan, Dónal & Newman, Alexandra, 2015. "Optimization-based heuristics for underground mine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 248-259.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mousavi, Amin & Sellers, Ewan, 2019. "Optimisation of production planning for an innovative hybrid underground mining method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 184-192.
    2. King, Barry & Goycoolea, Marcos & Newman, A., 2017. "Optimizing the open pit-to-underground mining transition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 297-309.
    3. Nikbin, V. & Ataee-pour, M. & Anani, A., 2020. "Optimization of level intervals in steeply-dipping vein deposits: A two-step approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Moreno, Eduardo & Rezakhah, Mojtaba & Newman, Alexandra & Ferreira, Felipe, 2017. "Linear models for stockpiling in open-pit mine production scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 212-221.
    5. Chung, Joyce & Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali & Topal, Erkan, 2022. "Timing of transition from open-pit to underground mining: A simultaneous optimisation model for open-pit and underground mine production schedules," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Ghorbani, Yousef & Nwaila, Glen T. & Zhang, Steven E. & Bourdeau, Julie E. & Cánovas, Manuel & Arzua, Javier & Nikadat, Nooraddin, 2023. "Moving towards deep underground mineral resources: Drivers, challenges and potential solutions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Chimunhu, Prosper & Topal, Erkan & Ajak, Ajak Duany & Asad, Waqar, 2022. "A review of machine learning applications for underground mine planning and scheduling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Sotoudeh, Farzad & Nehring, Micah & Kizil, Mehmet & Knights, Peter & Mousavi, Amin, 2020. "Production scheduling optimisation for sublevel stoping mines using mathematical programming: A review of literature and future directions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:77:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722001180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.