IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jouret/v93y2017i3p304-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual Control of Salesforce in Partially Integrated Channels

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Stephen K.
  • Tiwana, Amrit

Abstract

A manufacturer using a partially integrated channel (PIC) dispatches its own salesforce to the retailers that it sells through. The manufacturer salesforce in a PIC is simultaneously subject to controls by the manufacturer and the retailer, which we call dual control. Despite its increasing prevalence, how dual control influences salesforce performance remains understudied. We develop a discriminating alignment framework through two steps to answer this question. The first step examines the influence of a controller on the efficacy of a control mechanism. The efficacy of a control mechanism varies with the party that exerts control. The second step expands this logic to dual control. The performance effect of dual control is equivocal: It may have a positive, negative, or no influence on salesforce performance depending on discriminating alignment. To improve salesforce performance, a manufacturer’s control and a retailer’s control must compensate for each other’s weaknesses. Empirical tests based on matched dyadic data of dual control of salesforce by apparel manufacturers and retailers support our predictions with considerable theoretical and managerial implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Stephen K. & Tiwana, Amrit, 2017. "Dual Control of Salesforce in Partially Integrated Channels," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 304-316.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:93:y:2017:i:3:p:304-316
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2017.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435917300325
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretai.2017.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyle J. Mayer & Jack A. Nickerson, 2005. "Antecedents and Performance Implications of Contracting for Knowledge Workers: Evidence from Information Technology Services," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 225-242, June.
    2. Ranjay Gulati & Phanish Puranam, 2009. "Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies Between Formal and Informal Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 422-440, April.
    3. Behrman, Douglas N. & Perreault, William Jr., 1982. "Measuring the performance of industrial salespersons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 355-370, September.
    4. Cravens, David W. & Lassk, Felicia G. & Low, George S. & Marshall, Greg W. & Moncrief, William C., 2004. "Formal and informal management control combinations in sales organizations: The impact on salesperson consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 241-248, March.
    5. Joshi, Ashwin W. & Randall, Sheila, 2001. "The indirect effects of organizational controls on salesperson performance and customer orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-9, October.
    6. William G. Ouchi, 1979. "A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(9), pages 833-848, September.
    7. Gideon Kunda & Stephen R. Barley & James Evans, 2002. "Why Do Contractors Contract? The Experience of Highly Skilled Technical Professionals in a Contingent Labor Market," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 55(2), pages 234-261, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coelho, Filipe J. & Evanschitzky, Heiner & Sousa, Carlos M.P. & Olya, Hossein & Taheri, Babak, 2021. "Control mechanisms, management orientations, and the creativity of service employees: Symmetric and asymmetric modeling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 753-764.
    2. Liang, Xiaoning & Frösén, Johanna, 2020. "Examining the link between marketing controls and firm performance: The mediating effect of market-focused learning capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 545-556.
    3. Biong, Harald & Selnes, Fred, 1995. "Relational selling behavior and skills in long-term industrial buyer-seller relationships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 483-498.
    4. Yang, Feifei & Shinkle, George A. & Goudsmit, Mirjam, 2022. "The efficacy of organizational control interactions: External environmental uncertainty as a critical contingency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 855-868.
    5. Lukas Michel & Johanna Anzengruber & Marco Wölfle & Nick Hixson, 2018. "Under What Conditions Do Rules-Based and Capability-Based Management Modes Dominate?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Sebastian Goebel & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2017. "Effects of management control mechanisms: towards a more comprehensive analysis," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 185-219, February.
    7. David Gaddis Ross, 2014. "An Agency Theory of the Division of Managerial Labor," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 494-508, April.
    8. Spillecke, Susanne B. & Brettel, Malte, 2013. "The impact of sales management controls on the entrepreneurial orientation of the sales department," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 410-422.
    9. Verbeke, W.J.M.I. & Dietz, H.M.S. & Verwaal, E., 2010. "Drivers of Sales Performance: A Contemporary Meta-Analysis," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-031-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Piercy, Nigel F. & Low, George S. & Cravens, David W., 2004. "Examining the effectiveness of sales management control practices in developing countries," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 255-267, August.
    11. Fang, Eric & Evans, Kenneth R. & Zou, Shaoming, 2005. "The moderating effect of goal-setting characteristics on the sales control systems-job performance relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1214-1222, September.
    12. Kim, Changju & Takashima, Katsuyoshi, 2014. "The impact of outcome-based control for retail buyers on organizational performance," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 76-83.
    13. Paul, Michael & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Groth, Markus, 2015. "Tightening or loosening the “iron cage”? The impact of formal and informal display controls on service customers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1062-1073.
    14. Stephen K. Kim & Amrit Tiwana, 2016. "Chicken or egg? Sequential complementarity among salesforce control mechanisms," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 316-333, May.
    15. Christian Jung-Gehling & Erik Strauss, 2018. "A Contemporary Concept of Organizational Control: Its Dependence on Shared Values and Impact on Motivation," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 70(4), pages 341-374, November.
    16. Sebastian Goebel & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2017. "The Relationship Between Informal Controls, Ethical Work Climates, and Organizational Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 505-528, March.
    17. Miao Li & Luluo Peng & Guijun Zhuang, 2020. "Sales Control Systems and Salesperson Commitment: The Moderating Role of Behavior Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Johnson, Jeff S. & Friend, Scott B. & Agrawal, Arvind, 2016. "Dimensions and contingent effects of variable compensation system changes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2923-2930.
    19. Stock, Ruth Maria, 2016. "Understanding the relationship between frontline employee boreout and customer orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4259-4268.
    20. Devesh Baid, 2017. "A Study of Management Control Systems (MCS) and School Performance," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 16(2), pages 92-106, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:93:y:2017:i:3:p:304-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.