IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v69y2016i8p2923-2930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dimensions and contingent effects of variable compensation system changes

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Jeff S.
  • Friend, Scott B.
  • Agrawal, Arvind

Abstract

Compensation systems are regarded as one of the best incentives to motivate salespeople. Organizations aim to align compensation incentives with organizational strategies in order to integrate top-level initiatives with ground-floor implementation, often requiring periodic adjustments to reflect fluctuating market conditions. What is not known, however, is to what extent variable compensation system changes (VCSCs) impact the attitudinal and performance outcomes of salespeople. Using a sample of 306 business-to-business salespeople, the authors study the conditional effects of VCSC. Specifically, the authors conceptualize a multi-dimensional assessment of VCSC – frequency, magnitude, and implementation speed – and investigate each dimension's effect on salesperson job satisfaction and performance, contingent upon two environmental conditions—technological turbulence and competitive intensity. Findings show a mixture of accentuating and attenuating effects on both outcomes, allowing future researchers to gain a better understanding of under which conditions VCSCs impact salesperson attitudes and performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Jeff S. & Friend, Scott B. & Agrawal, Arvind, 2016. "Dimensions and contingent effects of variable compensation system changes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2923-2930.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:8:p:2923-2930
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829631500702X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshi, Ashwin W. & Randall, Sheila, 2001. "The indirect effects of organizational controls on salesperson performance and customer orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-9, October.
    2. Fang, Eric & Evans, Kenneth R. & Zou, Shaoming, 2005. "The moderating effect of goal-setting characteristics on the sales control systems-job performance relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1214-1222, September.
    3. Che-Ha, Norbani & Mavondo, Felix T. & Mohd-Said, Saad, 2014. "Performance or learning goal orientation: Implications for business performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2811-2820.
    4. Behrman, Douglas N. & Perreault, William Jr., 1982. "Measuring the performance of industrial salespersons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 355-370, September.
    5. Jagmohan S. Raju & V. Srinivasan, 1996. "Quota-Based Compensation Plans for Multiterritory Heterogeneous Salesforces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(10), pages 1454-1462, October.
    6. Amiya K. Basu & Rajiv Lal & V. Srinivasan & Richard Staelin, 1985. "Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 267-291.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valerie Good & Douglas E. Hughes & Hao Wang, 2022. "More than money: establishing the importance of a sense of purpose for salespeople," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 272-295, March.
    2. Valerie Good & Douglas E. Hughes & Ahmet H. Kirca & Sean McGrath, 2022. "A self-determination theory-based meta-analysis on the differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on salesperson performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 586-614, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biao Luo & Chengyuan Wang & Tieshan Li, 2018. "Inequity-averse agents’ deserved concerns under the linear contract: a social network setting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 129-148, September.
    2. Johannes Habel & Sascha Alavi & Nicolas Heinitz, 2023. "A theory of predictive sales analytics adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 34-54, June.
    3. Kräkel, Matthias & Schöttner, Anja, 2016. "Optimal sales force compensation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 126(PA), pages 179-195.
    4. Tat Y. Chan & Jia Li & Lamar Pierce, 2014. "Compensation and Peer Effects in Competing Sales Teams," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(8), pages 1965-1984, August.
    5. Sanjay Jain, 2012. "Self-Control and Incentives: An Analysis of Multiperiod Quota Plans," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(5), pages 855-869, September.
    6. Doug J. Chung & Thomas Steenburgh & K. Sudhir, 2014. "Do Bonuses Enhance Sales Productivity? A Dynamic Structural Analysis of Bonus-Based Compensation Plans," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 165-187, March.
    7. Selcuk, Cemil & Gokpinar, Bilal, 2022. "Incentivizing flexible workers in the gig economy: The case of ride-hailing," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2022/11, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    8. Jian Chen & He Huang & Liming Liu & Hongyan Xu, 2021. "Price Delegation or Not? The Effect of Heterogeneous Sales Agents," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1350-1364, May.
    9. Panos Kouvelis & Duo Shi, 2020. "Who Should Compensate the Sales Agent in a Distribution Channel?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(11), pages 2437-2460, November.
    10. Lee, Chung-Yee & Yang, Ruina, 2013. "Compensation plan for competing salespersons under asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 570-580.
    11. Kim, Stephen K. & Tiwana, Amrit, 2017. "Dual Control of Salesforce in Partially Integrated Channels," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 304-316.
    12. Oyer, Paul, 2000. "A Theory of Sales Quotas with Limited Liability and Rent Sharing," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(3), pages 405-426, July.
    13. Tinglong Dai & Kinshuk Jerath, 2013. "Salesforce Compensation with Inventory Considerations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(11), pages 2490-2501, November.
    14. Zoha Fatima & Adil Khan & Abdul Saboor Mohammad, 2024. "The Efficacy of Salesforce Control Systems: Their Impact on the Pharmaceutical Industry in India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 49(2), pages 275-292, May.
    15. Dmitri Kuksov & J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2019. "The Performance Measurement Trap," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 68-87, January.
    16. Mohammad E. Nikoofal & Mehmet Gümüş, 2018. "Quality at the Source or at the End? Managing Supplier Quality Under Information Asymmetry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 498-516, July.
    17. Jagmohan S. Raju & Abhik Roy, 2000. "Market Information and Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(8), pages 1075-1084, August.
    18. Wang, Xin & Tao, Zhiying & Liang, Liang & Gou, Qinglong, 2019. "An analysis of salary mechanisms in the sharing economy: The interaction between streamers and unions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 106-124.
    19. Duncan Simester & Juanjuan Zhang, 2014. "Why Do Salespeople Spend So Much Time Lobbying for Low Prices?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 796-808, November.
    20. Joseph Y. Chen & Bruce L. Miller, 2009. "On the Relative Performance of Linear vs. Piecewise-Linear-Threshold Intertemporal Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1743-1752, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:8:p:2923-2930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.