IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jouret/v100y2024i2p316-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Starbucks effect: When name-based order identification increases customers' store preference and service satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Lim, Sarah
  • van Osselaer, Stijn M.J.
  • Goodman, Joseph K.
  • Fuchs, Christoph
  • Schreier, Martin

Abstract

Retailers traditionally use a number system to match a product or service to a customer, ensuring that the customer receives the right product (e.g., a specific hot drink). However, some retailers have started to match an order by using a customer's name. Six studies, including an incentive-compatible experiment and field study, examine whether, when, and why order identification by a customer's name can either benefit or harm retailers. In contrast to prior research suggesting a negative effect of using a customer's name in marketing communications (e.g., online ads), the current research demonstrates a positive effect of identifying an order by name, which we refer to as the “Starbucks effect.” This positive effect, however, is mitigated or even backfires under specific circumstances. The results suggest that managers can use customers’ names while avoiding the use of numbers to increase customer preference for stores and service satisfaction, but with caution, especially in situations where privacy concerns may arise, even when the customer is only asked for their first name and could provide a fake name.

Suggested Citation

  • Lim, Sarah & van Osselaer, Stijn M.J. & Goodman, Joseph K. & Fuchs, Christoph & Schreier, Martin, 2024. "The Starbucks effect: When name-based order identification increases customers' store preference and service satisfaction," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 316-329.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:100:y:2024:i:2:p:316-329
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2024.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435924000186
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretai.2024.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:100:y:2024:i:2:p:316-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.