IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v104y2022ics0966692322001612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expansion of a small-scale car-sharing service: A multi-method framework for demand characterization and derivation of policy insights

Author

Listed:
  • Narayanan, Santhanakrishnan
  • Antoniou, Constantinos

Abstract

When a car-sharing system is small, at its early stages, the modal split for the service is very low (e.g. <50 trips per day for the entire system). This results in a situation, where it is not possible to account for the demand for the service through traditional mode choice models. In addition, the business model of such a car-sharing service can be designed for serving special trips (e.g., trips to furniture stores). In several cities, this special group of trips are not adequately reflected in the existing demand models. Therefore, the objective of this research is to develop a data-driven methodological framework for finding the demand for such a system and characterise the users. To characterise the users, a multinomial logit model is employed. A linear regression model is used to estimate the average daily demand for the whole system, and a dirichlet regression to distribute the system level daily demand to individual stations. The estimation results of the multinomial logit model indicate the influence of socio-demographic characteristics (age, employment, income, education, household vehicle ownership), use of conventional modes (bicycle, PT and private car) and supply parameter (fleet size). Moreover, the results reveal that the service can improve transport equity. The linear regression model shows that the average daily demand increases with an increase in the number of stations. Furthermore, the demand varies according to days of the week and months (i.e., seasonal variation). Similarly, the shares of demand for individual stations is influenced by days of week. In addition, the shares are affected by the system level daily demand, i.e., as the demand increases, certain stations attract more users. Besides the aforementioned findings, operational and policy measures are suggested under the following categories: (i) Mobility as a Service (MaaS), (ii) Pricing strategy, (iii) Hybrid fleet, and (iv) Campaigns. The contributions from this study enable several cities to characterise the car-sharing service at early stages for expansion and also support the sustainable growth and integration of the service towards MaaS, leading to a better and efficient transportation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Narayanan, Santhanakrishnan & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2022. "Expansion of a small-scale car-sharing service: A multi-method framework for demand characterization and derivation of policy insights," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:104:y:2022:i:c:s0966692322001612
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692322001612
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Narayanan, Santhanakrishnan & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2022. "Electric cargo cycles - A comprehensive review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 278-303.
    2. Karla Münzel & Wouter Boon & Koen Frenken & Taneli Vaskelainen, 2018. "Carsharing business models in Germany: characteristics, success and future prospects," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 271-291, May.
    3. Namazu, Michiko & MacKenzie, Don & Zerriffi, Hisham & Dowlatabadi, Hadi, 2018. "Is carsharing for everyone? Understanding the diffusion of carsharing services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 189-199.
    4. Raux, Charles & Zoubir, Ayman & Geyik, Mirkan, 2017. "Who are bike sharing schemes members and do they travel differently? The case of Lyon’s “Velo’v” scheme," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 350-363.
    5. Becker, Henrik & Balac, Milos & Ciari, Francesco & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 228-243.
    6. Tien Dung Tran & Nicolas Ovtracht & Bruno Faivre D’arcier, 2015. "Modeling Bike Sharing System using Built Environment Factors," Post-Print halshs-01474166, HAL.
    7. Sweet, Matthias N. & Scott, Darren M., 2021. "Shared mobility adoption from 2016 to 2018 in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: Demographic or geographic diffusion?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Shaheen, Susan A & Cohen, Adam P, 2007. "Growth in Worldwide Carsharing: An International Comparison," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2zv240pp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    9. Silvia Ferrari & Francisco Cribari-Neto, 2004. "Beta Regression for Modelling Rates and Proportions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 799-815.
    10. Narayanan, Santhanakrishnan & Gruber, Johannes & Liedtke, Gernot & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2022. "Purchase intention and actual purchase of cargo cycles: Influencing factors and policy insights," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 31-45.
    11. Giulio Giorgione & Francesco Ciari & Francesco Viti, 2020. "Dynamic Pricing on Round-Trip Carsharing Services: Travel Behavior and Equity Impact Analysis through an Agent-Based Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Hamann, Thomas K. & Güldenberg, Stefan & Renzl, Birgit, 2019. "Overshare and collapse: How sustainable are profit-oriented company-to-peer bike-sharing systems?," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 73(4), pages 345-373.
    13. Tang, Jinjun & Gao, Fan & Han, Chunyang & Cen, Xuekai & Li, Zhitao, 2021. "Uncovering the spatially heterogeneous effects of shared mobility on public transit and taxi," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Zhou, Fan & Zheng, Zuduo & Whitehead, Jake & Washington, Simon & Perrons, Robert K. & Page, Lionel, 2020. "Preference heterogeneity in mode choice for car-sharing and shared automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 633-650.
    15. Becker, Henrik & Ciari, Francesco & Axhausen, Kay W., 2017. "Comparing car-sharing schemes in Switzerland: User groups and usage patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 17-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narayanan, Santhanakrishnan & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2023. "Shared mobility services towards Mobility as a Service (MaaS): What, who and when?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Sweet, Matthias N. & Scott, Darren M., 2021. "Shared mobility adoption from 2016 to 2018 in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: Demographic or geographic diffusion?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Golalikhani, Masoud & Oliveira, Beatriz Brito & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José Fernando & Antunes, António Pais, 2021. "Carsharing: A review of academic literature and business practices toward an integrated decision-support framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. María Ampudia-Renuncio & Begoña Guirao & Rafael Molina-Sanchez & Luís Bragança, 2020. "Electric Free-Floating Carsharing for Sustainable Cities: Characterization of Frequent Trip Profiles Using Acquired Rental Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Cláudia A. Soares Machado & Nicolas Patrick Marie De Salles Hue & Fernando Tobal Berssaneti & José Alberto Quintanilha, 2018. "An Overview of Shared Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Doll, Claus & Krauss, Konstantin, 2022. "Nachhaltige Mobilität und innovative Geschäftsmodelle," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 10-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    7. Karla Münzel & Laura Piscicelli & Wouter Boon & Koen Frenken, 2018. "Different business models - different users? Uncovering the motives and characteristics of B2C and P2P carsharing adopters," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 18-01, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Sep 2018.
    8. Cantelmo, Guido & Amini, Roja Ezzati & Monteiro, Mayara Moraes & Frenkel, Amnon & Lerner, Ofer & Tavory, Sharon Shoshany & Galtzur, Ayelet & Kamargianni, Maria & Shiftan, Yoram & Behrischi, Christiane, 2022. "Aligning users’ and stakeholders’ needs: How incentives can reshape the carsharing market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 306-326.
    9. Chicco, Andrea & Diana, Marco & Loose, Willi & Nehrke, Gunnar, 2022. "Comparing car ownership reduction patterns among members of different car sharing schemes operating in three German inner-city areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 370-385.
    10. Jochem, Patrick & Frankenhauser, Dominik & Ewald, Lukas & Ensslen, Axel & Fromm, Hansjörg, 2020. "Does free-floating carsharing reduce private vehicle ownership? The case of SHARE NOW in European cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 373-395.
    11. Lucia Rotaris & Marko Bumbulovic, 2020. "Carsharing: Business models, and role of the decision maker," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 63-94.
    12. Zijlstra, Toon & Durand, Anne & Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Sascha & Harms, Lucas, 2020. "Early adopters of Mobility-as-a-Service in the Netherlands," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 197-209.
    13. Nancy Bocken & Alexandra Jonca & Karolina Södergren & Jenny Palm, 2020. "Emergence of Carsharing Business Models and Sustainability Impacts in Swedish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Rüdiger Hahn & Felix Ostertag & Adrian Lehr & Marion Büttgen & Sabine Benoit, 2020. "“I like it, but I don't use it”: Impact of carsharing business models on usage intentions in the sharing economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1404-1418, March.
    15. Diana, Marco & Chicco, Andrea, 2022. "The spatial reconfiguration of parking demand due to car sharing diffusion: a simulated scenario for the cities of Milan and Turin (Italy)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Weibo Li & Maria Kamargianni, 2020. "Steering short-term demand for car-sharing: a mode choice and policy impact analysis by trip distance," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2233-2265, October.
    17. Willberg, Elias & Salonen, Maria & Toivonen, Tuuli, 2021. "What do trip data reveal about bike-sharing system users?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Wells, Peter & Wang, Xiaobei & Wang, Liqiao & Liu, Haokun & Orsato, Renato, 2020. "More friends than foes? The impact of automobility-as-a-service on the incumbent automotive industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Jean Leroy & Guillaume Bailly & Gérald Billard, 2023. "Introducing carsharing schemes in low‐density areas: The case of the outskirts of Le Mans (France)," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 239-255, April.
    20. Beibei Hu & Yue Sun & Huijun Sun & Xianlei Dong, 2020. "A Contrastive Study on Travel Costs of Car-Sharing and Taxis Based on GPS Trajectory Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-28, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:104:y:2022:i:c:s0966692322001612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.