IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v55y2020ics0969698919301481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the link between innovation and mainstream adoption: How to identify consumer trends

Author

Listed:
  • Cloughton, Carol

Abstract

Retailers operate in a very competitive environment and are facing increasing challenges. One such challenge is to anticipate change in their consumers and interpret these into relevant innovative products and service. For retailers, even with a customer centric approach, identifying imminent change in consumer preference and updating and adapting their business models on a continuous basis can create a distinct competitive advantage. Extant literature does not adequately address what methods are available to identify new consumer trends for the retail industry. The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework to assess the market potential of an innovation to be adopted by mainstream markets. The framework has been drawn from exiting methodologies and applied to the emerging trend in horticulture in the UK. The case study analysis provides evidence that there is the opportunity for horticulture to appeal to a broader market sector. This framework provides scholars and marketers with a foundation for a better understanding of the process of identifying innovations for mainstream consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Cloughton, Carol, 2020. "Investigating the link between innovation and mainstream adoption: How to identify consumer trends," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:55:y:2020:i:c:s0969698919301481
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698919301481
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Pretty & J. Peacock & R. Hine & M. Sellens & N. South & M. Griffin, 2007. "Green exercise in the UK countryside: Effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 211-231.
    2. Clark, Kim B., 1985. "The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 235-251, October.
    3. Hubert Gatignon & Xavier Lecocq & Koen Pauwels & Alina Sorescu, 2017. "A marketing perspective on business models," Post-Print hal-01745312, HAL.
    4. John Hauser & Gerard J. Tellis & Abbie Griffin, 2006. "Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 687-717, 11-12.
    5. Peres, Renana & Muller, Eitan & Mahajan, Vijay, 2010. "Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 91-106.
    6. Hubert Gatignon & Xavier Lecocq & Koen Pauwels & Alina Sorescu, 2017. "A marketing perspective on business models," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(3), pages 85-89, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tim Charly Schmacke, Roland Vogt & Roland Vogt, 2023. "Trends of Current and Future Retail Formats Based on Customer Personas. Implications on the Example of the Premium Automotive Retail," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 191-219, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kocaman, Barış & Gelper, Sarah & Langerak, Fred, 2023. "Till the cloud do us part: Technological disruption and brand retention in the enterprise software industry," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 316-341.
    2. O. C. Ferrell, 2018. "Marketing’s identity crisis: it’s complicated," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(1), pages 30-38, June.
    3. Ashkan Negahban & Jeffrey S. Smith, 2018. "A joint analysis of production and seeding strategies for new products: an agent-based simulation approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 41-62, September.
    4. Katharina Elisabeth Fischer & Tom Stargardt, 2016. "The diffusion of generics after patent expiry in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(8), pages 1027-1040, November.
    5. George Bogdan Dragan & Gianita Bleoju, 2019. "Digital Interaction on Eco Label Value Chain," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 510-514.
    6. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    7. Guseo, Renato & Guidolin, Mariangela, 2015. "Heterogeneity in diffusion of innovations modelling: A few fundamental types," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 514-524.
    8. Saurabh Panwar & P. K. Kapur & Ompal Singh, 2019. "Modeling Technological Substitution by Incorporating Dynamic Adoption Rate," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Nejad, Mohammad G. & Amini, Mehdi & Babakus, Emin, 2015. "Success Factors in Product Seeding: The Role of Homophily," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 68-88.
    10. Czinkota, Michael & Kaufmann, Hans Rüdiger & Basile, Gianpaolo & Ferri, Maria Antonella, 2020. "For-Benefit Company (fBComp): An innovative social-business model. The Italian case," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 377-387.
    11. A. Negahban & J.S. Smith, 2016. "The effect of supply and demand uncertainties on the optimal production and sales plans for new products," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(13), pages 3852-3869, July.
    12. Byung Cheol Lee & Christine Moorman & C. Page Moreau & Andrew T. Stephen & Donald R. Lehmann, 2020. "The past, present, and future of innovation research," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 187-198, September.
    13. Shinhye Kim & Melanie Bowen & Xiaohan (Hannah) Wen, 2019. "The ultimate co-creation: leveraging customer input in business model innovation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 339-356, December.
    14. Shi, Xiaohui & Li, Feng & Bigdeli, Ali Ziaee, 2016. "An examination of NPD models in the context of business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2541-2550.
    15. Negahban, Ashkan & Smith, Jeffrey S., 2018. "Optimal production-sales policies and entry time for successive generations of new products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 220-232.
    16. Branstad, Are & Solem, Birgit A., 2020. "Emerging theories of consumer-driven market innovation, adoption, and diffusion: A selective review of consumer-oriented studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 561-571.
    17. Budler, Marko & Župič, Ivan & Trkman, Peter, 2021. "The development of business model research: A bibliometric review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 480-495.
    18. Alina Sorescu & Martin Schreier, 2021. "Innovation in the digital economy: a broader view of its scope, antecedents, and consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 627-631, July.
    19. Karthik Sridhar & Ram Bezawada & Minakshi Trivedi, 2012. "Investigating the Drivers of Consumer Cross-Category Learning for New Products Using Multiple Data Sets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 668-688, July.
    20. Manjit S. Yadav, 2019. "AMS Review: Progress toward a world-class journal dedicated to theory development," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-4, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:55:y:2020:i:c:s0969698919301481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.