IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v41y2018icp248-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

She loves the way you lie: Size-related self-concept and gender in vanity sizing

Author

Listed:
  • Ketron, Seth
  • Williams, Miranda

Abstract

This work investigates size-related self-concept (SRSC) – the extent to which apparel size defines one's identity – and its relationship to perceived deception of and purchase intentions toward vanity-sized garments. Through the lens of self-enhancement theory, two studies reveal that SRSC exerts a significant influence on perceived deception and purchase intentions in garment size labeling contexts, moderated by gender. Study 1 indicates that among females, SRSC has no influence on perceived deception when a properly-fitting garment is labeled one size smaller than the consumer's typical size. However, when the garment is the same size as the typical, SRSC has a positive relationship with perceived deception. Study 2 shows that gender moderates the effect of SRSC on perceived deception of as well as purchase intentions toward a vanity-sized garment, such that SRSC positively predicts perceived deception among males but not among females, while SRSC positively predicts purchase intentions among females but not among males. This work contributes the concept and role of SRSC to the vanity sizing context, indicating that SRSC is just as important as gender in the vanity sizing discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Ketron, Seth & Williams, Miranda, 2018. "She loves the way you lie: Size-related self-concept and gender in vanity sizing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 248-255.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:41:y:2018:i:c:p:248-255
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698917303569
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denise Janssen & Leonard Paas, 2014. "Moderately thin advertising models are optimal, most of the time: Moderating the quadratic effect of model body size on ad attitude by fashion leadership," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 167-177, June.
    2. Franz, Wan-Ju Iris, 2017. "Economics of vanity sizing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 336-355.
    3. Ketron, Seth, 2016. "Consumer cynicism and perceived deception in vanity sizing: The moderating role of retailer (dis)honesty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 33-42.
    4. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    5. Thompson, Craig J & Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1995. "Understanding the Socialized Body: A Poststructuralist Analysis of Consumers' Self-Conceptions, Body Images, and Self-Care Practices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(2), pages 139-153, September.
    6. Ketron, Seth & Spears, Nancy, 2017. "Liar, liar, my size is higher: How retailer context influences labeled size believability and consumer responses to vanity sizing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 185-192.
    7. Nİlüfer Z. Aydinoğlu & Aradhna Krishna, 2011. "Guiltless Gluttony: The Asymmetric Effect of Size Labels on Size Perceptions and Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(6), pages 1095-1112.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donato, Carmela & Monsurrò, Luigi & Di Cioccio, Martina, 2024. "A matter of identity: Promoting plant-based food among meat-eaters through a common identity priming," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Llamas, Rosa & Thomsen, Thyra Uth, 2016. "The luxury of igniting change by giving: Transforming yourself while transforming others' lives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 166-176.
    3. Sirieix, Lucie & Séré de Lanauze, Gilles & Dyen, Margot & Balbo, Laurie & Suarez, Erick, 2023. "The role of communities in vegetarian and vegan identity construction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Black, Iain & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2017. "Working consumers: Co-creation of brand identity, consumer identity and brand community identity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 416-429.
    5. Cagri Yalkin & Richard Rosenbaum-Elliott, 2014. "Talking Fashion in Female Friendship Groups: Negotiating the Necessary Marketplace Skills and Knowledge," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 301-331, June.
    6. Zhu, Jiang & Jiang, Lan & Dou, Wenyu & Liang, Liang, 2019. "Post, Eat, Change: The Effects of Posting Food Photos on Consumers' Dining Experiences and Brand Evaluation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 101-112.
    7. Soo-Hyun Jun, 2022. "Why Do People Post Photos on Instagram?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Ferreira, Marcia Christina & Scaraboto, Daiane, 2016. "“My plastic dreams”: Towards an extended understanding of materiality and the shaping of consumer identities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 191-207.
    9. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    10. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Chen, Zengxiang & Huang, Yunhui, 2016. "Cause-related marketing is not always less favorable than corporate philanthropy: The moderating role of self-construal," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 868-880.
    12. Cherrier, Helene & Türe, Meltem, 2020. "Value dynamics in ordinary object disposal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 221-228.
    13. Mariek Vanden Abeele & Ralf De Wolf & Rich Ling, 2018. "Mobile Media and Social Space: How Anytime, Anyplace Connectivity Structures Everyday Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 5-14.
    14. Abdelmajid Amine & Audrey Bonnemaizon & Margaret Josion-Portail, 2017. "Tailoring Elderly Patients’ Identities through Healthcare Service Relationships: Toward a Guardian Conception of Vulnerable Publics’ Identities," Post-Print hal-01684147, HAL.
    15. Maystre, Nicolas & Olivier, Jacques & Thoenig, Mathias & Verdier, Thierry, 2014. "Product-based cultural change: Is the village global?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 212-230.
    16. Eva Cerio & Alain Debenedetti, 2019. "From dispossession to objects' reuse: trajectories and practices in the context of clothing," Post-Print hal-02135221, HAL.
    17. Ruvio, Ayalla A. & Shoham, Aviv, 2016. "Consumer arrogance: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3989-3997.
    18. Mikko Kurenlahti & Arto O. Salonen, 2018. "Rethinking Consumerism from the Perspective of Religion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    19. F. Magnoni & Elyette Roux, 2011. "Stretching a luxury brand down: An experimental study of core brand dilution effects," Post-Print halshs-00644899, HAL.
    20. Dietrich, Daniel, 2018. "Digital Brand Disruption - How Opinion Leaders Evoke Unexpected Brand Meanings," Marketing Review St.Gallen, Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Marketing und Customer Insight, vol. 35(2), pages 66-72.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:41:y:2018:i:c:p:248-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.