IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v38y2017icp81-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets

Author

Listed:
  • Pantano, Eleonora
  • Rese, Alexandra
  • Baier, Daniel

Abstract

Although online stores extend the traditional offer of the brick and mortar ones, the limited possibilities to virtually try the product before the effective buying makes the online purchase decision a complex process for consumers. Therefore, online retailers face new challenges for supporting consumers consisting of the introduction of advanced technologies such as augmented reality systems. The present study investigates the effect of augmented reality technologies on consumer behaviour within the online retail environments, by comparing two different cultural settings. Drawing upon the technology acceptance model (TAM), new constructs related to the technology characteristics (e.g. quality of information, aesthetic quality, interactivity, and response time) developed a new conceptual model. This model has been tested for a new technology for virtual try-on (a smart mirror for virtual glasses). Focusing on young consumers, data collected in Italy and Germany yielding a total of 318 participants was used. Findings across these two markets reflect cross-market similarities, but also dissimilarities, related to consumers’ motivation to employ augmented reality systems for supporting their online purchase decision. These insights should prove helpful to retailers in better manage the online channels, that could be easily extended to the mobile one.

Suggested Citation

  • Pantano, Eleonora & Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel, 2017. "Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 81-95.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:38:y:2017:i:c:p:81-95
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.05.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096969891730098X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.05.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie Beck & Dominique Crié, 2016. "I virtually try it … I want it! Virtual Fitting Room: a tool to increase on-line and off-line exploratory behaviour, patronage and purchase intentions," Post-Print hal-01562981, HAL.
    2. Dennis, Charles & Joško Brakus, J. & Gupta, Suraksha & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2014. "The effect of digital signage on shoppers' behavior: The role of the evoked experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2250-2257.
    3. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    4. Ha, Sejin & Stoel, Leslie, 2009. "Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 565-571, May.
    5. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    6. Porter, Constance Elise & Donthu, Naveen, 2006. "Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 999-1007, September.
    7. Hausman, Angela V. & Siekpe, Jeffrey Sam, 2009. "The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 5-13, January.
    8. Marios Koufaris, 2002. "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 205-223, June.
    9. Tony Chapman & Bill Best & Paul Van Casteren, 2003. "Review of Best Practice," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Executive Coaching, chapter 0, pages 257-268, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Papagiannidis, Savvas & See-To, Eric & Bourlakis, Michael, 2014. "Virtual test-driving: The impact of simulated products on purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 877-887.
    11. Söderlund, Magnus & Julander, Claes-Robert, 2009. "Physical attractiveness of the service worker in the moment of truth and its effects on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 216-226.
    12. Pantano, Eleonora & Servidio, Rocco, 2012. "Modeling innovative points of sales through virtual and immersive technologies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 279-286.
    13. Demirkan, Haluk & Spohrer, Jim, 2014. "Developing a framework to improve virtual shopping in digital malls with intelligent self-service systems," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 860-868.
    14. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman & Yiu-Fai Yung, 2000. "Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 22-42, May.
    15. Choi, Yung Kyun & Totten, Jeff W., 2012. "Self-construal's role in mobile TV acceptance: Extension of TAM across cultures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1525-1533.
    16. Wynne W. Chin & Barbara L. Marcolin & Peter R. Newsted, 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 189-217, June.
    17. Rese, Alexandra & Schreiber, Stefanie & Baier, Daniel, 2014. "Technology acceptance modeling of augmented reality at the point of sale: Can surveys be replaced by an analysis of online reviews?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 869-876.
    18. Holbrook, Morris B & Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1982. "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 132-140, September.
    19. Kim, Jiyeon & Forsythe, Sandra, 2008. "Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 45-59.
    20. Hyunae Lee & Namho Chung & Timothy Jung, 2015. "Examining the Cultural Differences in Acceptance of Mobile Augmented Reality: Comparison of South Korea and Ireland," Springer Books, in: Iis Tussyadiah & Alessandro Inversini (ed.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015, edition 127, pages 477-491, Springer.
    21. Hoffman, Donna L. & Novak, Thomas P., 2009. "Flow Online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 23-34.
    22. Claudio Fassio, 2015. "How Similar is Innovation in German, Italian and Spanish Medium-Technology Sectors? Implications for the Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Distance-to-the-Frontier Perspectives," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 102-125, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel & Geyer-Schulz, Andreas & Schreiber, Stefanie, 2017. "How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 306-319.
    2. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    3. Pillai, Rajasshrie & Sivathanu, Brijesh & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2020. "Shopping intention at AI-powered automated retail stores (AIPARS)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Han, Sang-Lin & An, Myounga & Han, Jerry J. & Lee, Jiyoung, 2020. "Telepresence, time distortion, and consumer traits of virtual reality shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 311-320.
    5. Huang, Yu-Chih & Backman, Sheila J. & Backman, Kenneth F. & Moore, DeWayne, 2013. "Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 490-501.
    6. Domina, Tanya & Lee, Seung-Eun & MacGillivray, Maureen, 2012. "Understanding factors affecting consumer intention to shop in a virtual world," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 613-620.
    7. Arghashi, Vahideh & Yuksel, Cenk Arsun, 2022. "Interactivity, Inspiration, and Perceived Usefulness! How retailers’ AR-apps improve consumer engagement through flow," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Gao, Lingling & Bai, Xuesong, 2014. "Online consumer behaviour and its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online travel agencies in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 653-665.
    9. Ozkara, Behcet Yalin & Ozmen, Mujdat & Kim, Jong Woo, 2017. "Examining the effect of flow experience on online purchase: A novel approach to the flow theory based on hedonic and utilitarian value," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 119-131.
    10. Kang, Hyo Jeong & Shin, Jung-hye & Ponto, Kevin, 2020. "How 3D Virtual Reality Stores Can Shape Consumer Purchase Decisions: The Roles of Informativeness and Playfulness," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 70-85.
    11. Serravalle, Francesca & Vanheems, Régine & Viassone, Milena, 2023. "Does product involvement drive consumer flow state in the AR environment? A study on behavioural responses," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Holdack, Eric & Lurie-Stoyanov, Katja & Fromme, Harro Fabian, 2022. "The role of perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness in assessing the acceptance of AR wearables," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Wu, Ing-Long & Chen, Kuei-Wan & Chiu, Mai-Lun, 2016. "Defining key drivers of online impulse purchasing: A perspective of both impulse shoppers and system users," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 284-296.
    14. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Bhattacharya, Mithu & Trinchera, Laura & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2017. "Role of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in user social media acceptance within workspace: Assessing unobserved heterogeneity," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 1-13.
    15. Julian M. Müller, 2019. "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing—A Study across Europe, China, and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Dehghani, Milad & Lee, Seung Hwan (Mark) & Mashatan, Atefeh, 2020. "Touching holograms with windows mixed reality: Renovating the consumer retailing services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. Jamie Carlson & Natalie Jane Vries & Mohammad M. Rahman & Alex Taylor, 2017. "Go with the flow: engineering flow experiences for customer engagement value creation in branded social media environments," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 334-348, August.
    18. Maria Tsourela & Dafni-Maria Nerantzaki, 2020. "An Internet of Things (IoT) Acceptance Model. Assessing Consumer’s Behavior toward IoT Products and Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, November.
    19. Kerstin Pezoldt & Jana Schliewe, 2012. "Akzeptanz von Self-Service-Technologien: State of the Art," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 205-253, March.
    20. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:38:y:2017:i:c:p:81-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.