IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v90y2020ics030504831830149x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Algorithmic approaches to the multiple knapsack assignment problem

Author

Listed:
  • Martello, Silvano
  • Monaci, Michele

Abstract

We consider a variant of the multiple knapsack problem in which some assignment-type side constraints have to be satisfied. The problem finds applications in logistics sectors related, e.g., to transportation and maritime shipping. We derive upper bounds from Lagrangian and surrogate relaxations of a mathematical model of the problem. We introduce a constructive heuristic and a metaheuristic refinement. We study the computational complexity of the proposed methods and evaluate their practical performance through extensive computational experiments on benchmarks from the literature and on new sets of randomly generated instances.

Suggested Citation

  • Martello, Silvano & Monaci, Michele, 2020. "Algorithmic approaches to the multiple knapsack assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s030504831830149x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.11.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504831830149X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2018.11.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diaz, Juan Esteban & Handl, Julia & Xu, Dong-Ling, 2018. "Integrating meta-heuristics, simulation and exact techniques for production planning of a failure-prone manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 976-989.
    2. Zhen, Lu & Wang, Kai & Wang, Shuaian & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Tug scheduling for hinterland barge transport: A branch-and-price approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 119-132.
    3. Mohamed Esseghir Lalami & Moussa Elkihel & Didier El Baz & Vincent Boyer, 2012. "A procedure-based heuristic for 0-1 Multiple Knapsack Problems," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 214-224.
    4. Alex Fukunaga, 2011. "A branch-and-bound algorithm for hard multiple knapsack problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 97-119, April.
    5. Geir Dahl & Njål Foldnes, 2006. "LP based heuristics for the multiple knapsack problem with assignment restrictions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 91-104, September.
    6. Yamada, Takeo & Takeoka, Takahiro, 2009. "An exact algorithm for the fixed-charge multiple knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 700-705, January.
    7. Dimitrov, Nedialko B. & Solow, Daniel & Szmerekovsky, Joseph & Guo, Jia, 2017. "Emergency relocation of items using single trips: Special cases of the Multiple Knapsack Assignment Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 938-942.
    8. Kataoka, Seiji & Yamada, Takeo, 2014. "Upper and lower bounding procedures for the multiple knapsack assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 440-447.
    9. Pisinger, David, 1999. "An exact algorithm for large multiple knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 528-541, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elias Munapo & Santosh Kumar, 2021. "Reducing the complexity of the knapsack linear integer problem by reformulation techniques," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1087-1093, December.
    2. Mancini, Simona & Triki, Chefi & Piya, Sujan, 2022. "Optimal selection of touristic packages based on user preferences during sports mega-events," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 819-830.
    3. Keskin, Burcu B. & Griffin, Emily C. & Prell, Jonathan O. & Dilkina, Bistra & Ferber, Aaron & MacDonald, John & Hilend, Rowan & Griffis, Stanley & Gore, Meredith L., 2023. "Quantitative Investigation of Wildlife Trafficking Supply Chains: A Review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Fukasawa, Ricardo & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Oliveira, Daniel, 2024. "The price-elastic knapsack problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    5. Stefka Fidanova & Krassimir Todorov Atanassov, 2021. "ACO with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Pheromone Updating Applied on Multiple-Constraint Knapsack Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-7, June.
    6. Alexandros Nikas & Angelos Fountoulakis & Aikaterini Forouli & Haris Doukas, 2022. "A robust augmented ε-constraint method (AUGMECON-R) for finding exact solutions of multi-objective linear programming problems," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1291-1332, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Homsi, Gabriel & Jordan, Jeremy & Martello, Silvano & Monaci, Michele, 2021. "The assignment and loading transportation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 999-1007.
    2. Stefka Fidanova & Krassimir Todorov Atanassov, 2021. "ACO with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Pheromone Updating Applied on Multiple-Constraint Knapsack Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-7, June.
    3. Dell’Amico, Mauro & Delorme, Maxence & Iori, Manuel & Martello, Silvano, 2019. "Mathematical models and decomposition methods for the multiple knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 886-899.
    4. Zhen, Lu & Wang, Kai & Wang, Shuaian & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Tug scheduling for hinterland barge transport: A branch-and-price approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 119-132.
    5. Tomohiko Mizutani & Makoto Yamashita, 2013. "Correlative sparsity structures and semidefinite relaxations for concave cost transportation problems with change of variables," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1073-1100, July.
    6. Mancini, Simona & Ciavotta, Michele & Meloni, Carlo, 2021. "The Multiple Multidimensional Knapsack with Family-Split Penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 987-998.
    7. Diaz, Juan Esteban & Handl, Julia & Xu, Dong-Ling, 2018. "Integrating meta-heuristics, simulation and exact techniques for production planning of a failure-prone manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 976-989.
    8. Olivier Lalonde & Jean-François Côté & Bernard Gendron, 2022. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Multiple Knapsack Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3134-3150, November.
    9. Kataoka, Seiji & Yamada, Takeo, 2014. "Upper and lower bounding procedures for the multiple knapsack assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 440-447.
    10. Karel Ječmen & Denisa Mocková & Dušan Teichmann, 2024. "Solving Transport Infrastructure Investment Project Selection and Scheduling Using Genetic Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, September.
    11. J. Álvaro Gómez-Pantoja & M. Angélica Salazar-Aguilar & José Luis González-Velarde, 2021. "The food bank resource allocation problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 266-286, April.
    12. Mancini, Simona & Triki, Chefi & Piya, Sujan, 2022. "Optimal selection of touristic packages based on user preferences during sports mega-events," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 819-830.
    13. RuiYang Li & Ming He & HongYue He & QiaoYu Deng, 2022. "Heuristic column generation for designing an express circular packaging distribution network," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1103-1126, April.
    14. Wei, Xiaoyang & Jia, Shuai & Meng, Qiang & Tan, Kok Choon, 2020. "Tugboat scheduling for container ports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    15. HOSSAIN, Niamat Ullah Ibne & Amrani, Safae El & Jaradat, Raed & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Buchanan, Randy & Rinaudo, Christina & Hamilton, Michael, 2020. "Modeling and assessing interdependencies between critical infrastructures using Bayesian network: A case study of inland waterway port and surrounding supply chain network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Mhand Hifi & Hedi Mhalla & Slim Sadfi, 2005. "Sensitivity of the Optimum to Perturbations of the Profit or Weight of an Item in the Binary Knapsack Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 239-260, November.
    17. Yang, Zhen & Chen, Haoxun & Chu, Feng & Wang, Nengmin, 2019. "An effective hybrid approach to the two-stage capacitated facility location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 467-480.
    18. Peng Wu & Junheng Cheng & Feng Chu, 2021. "Large-scale energy-conscious bi-objective single-machine batch scheduling under time-of-use electricity tariffs via effective iterative heuristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 471-494, January.
    19. Fazi, Stefano & Fransoo, Jan C. & Van Woensel, Tom & Dong, Jing-Xin, 2020. "A variant of the split vehicle routing problem with simultaneous deliveries and pickups for inland container shipping in dry-port based systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    20. Stefan Hajkowicz & Andrew Higgins & Kristen Williams & Daniel P. Faith & Michael Burton, 2007. "Optimisation and the selection of conservation contracts," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(1), pages 39-56, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s030504831830149x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.