IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v69y2017icp102-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating driving range variability in network design for refueling facilities

Author

Listed:
  • de Vries, Harwin
  • Duijzer, Evelot

Abstract

To stimulate and facilitate the use of alternative-fuel vehicles, it is crucial to have a network of refueling or recharging stations in place that guarantees that vehicles can reach (most of) their destinations without running out of fuel. Because initial investments in these stations are restricted, it is important to choose their locations deliberately. A fast growing stream of literature therefore analyzes the problem of locating refueling or recharging stations. The models proposed in these studies assume that the driving range is fixed, although reality shows that the driving range is highly stochastic. These models thereby misrepresent the actual coverage a network of refueling stations provides to drivers. This paper introduces two problems that do take the stochastic nature of the driving range into account. We first introduce the Expected Flow Refueling Location Problem, which is to maximize the expected number of drivers who can complete their trip without running out of fuel. The Chance Constrained Flow Refueling Location Problem is to maximize the number of drivers for which the probability of running out of fuel is below a certain threshold. We prove the problems to be strongly NP-hard, propose novel mixed-integer programming formulations for these problems, and show how these models can be extended to the case that the driving range varies during a trip. Furthermore, we extensively analyze and compare our models using randomly generated problem instances and a real life case study about the Florida state highway network. Our results show that taking the stochastic nature of the driving range into account can substantially improve network coverage, that optimal solutions are highly robust with respect to data impreciseness, and that the potential gains of stochastic models heavily depend on the driving range distribution. Based on the results, we discuss policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • de Vries, Harwin & Duijzer, Evelot, 2017. "Incorporating driving range variability in network design for refueling facilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 102-114.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:102-114
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504831630490X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chong, Terence Tai-Leung & Lam, Tau-Hing & Yan, Isabel Kit-Ming, 2012. "Is the Chinese stock market really inefficient?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 122-137.
    2. Capar, Ismail & Kuby, Michael & Leon, V. Jorge & Tsai, Yu-Jiun, 2013. "An arc cover–path-cover formulation and strategic analysis of alternative-fuel station locations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 142-151.
    3. de Vries, H. & van de Klundert, J.J. & Wagelmans, A.P.M., 2014. "The Roadside Healthcare Facility Location Problem," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2014-09, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Romm, Joseph, 2006. "The car and fuel of the future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 2609-2614, November.
    5. Blanchet, Jose & Lam, Henry & Zwart, Bert, 2012. "Efficient rare-event simulation for perpetuities," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 122(10), pages 3361-3392.
    6. Hosseini, Meysam & MirHassani, S.A., 2015. "Refueling-station location problem under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 101-116.
    7. ., 2012. "Efficient Structure of Exchange," Chapters, in: Why is there Money?, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Averbakh, Igor & Berman, Oded, 1996. "Locating flow-capturing units on a network with multi-counting and diminishing returns to scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 495-506, June.
    9. Yıldız, Barış & Arslan, Okan & Karaşan, Oya Ekin, 2016. "A branch and price approach for routing and refueling station location model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 815-826.
    10. Oded Berman & Richard C. Larson & Nikoletta Fouska, 1992. "Optimal Location of Discretionary Service Facilities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 201-211, August.
    11. Kuby, Michael & Lim, Seow, 2005. "The flow-refueling location problem for alternative-fuel vehicles," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 125-145, June.
    12. Núñez Ares, José & de Vries, Harwin & Huisman, Dennis, 2016. "A column generation approach for locating roadside clinics in Africa based on effectiveness and equity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 1002-1016.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quddus, Md Abdul & Kabli, Mohannad & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad, 2019. "Modeling electric vehicle charging station expansion with an integration of renewable energy and Vehicle-to-Grid sources," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 251-279.
    2. Lee, Chungmok & Han, Jinil, 2017. "Benders-and-Price approach for electric vehicle charging station location problem under probabilistic travel range," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 130-152.
    3. Mahmutoğulları, Özlem & Yaman, Hande, 2023. "Robust alternative fuel refueling station location problem with routing under decision-dependent flow uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 173-188.
    4. Li, Lei & Manier, Hervé & Manier, Marie-Ange, 2019. "Hydrogen supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 342-360.
    5. Guo, Fang & Yang, Jun & Lu, Jianyi, 2018. "The battery charging station location problem: Impact of users’ range anxiety and distance convenience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-18.
    6. Yang, Jun & Guo, Fang & Zhang, Min, 2017. "Optimal planning of swapping/charging station network with customer satisfaction," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 174-197.
    7. Li, Lei & Al Chami, Zaher & Manier, Hervé & Manier, Marie-Ange & Xue, Jian, 2021. "Incorporating fuel delivery in network design for hydrogen fueling stations: Formulation and two metaheuristic approaches," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Harwin de Vries & Joris van de Klundert & Albert P.M. Wagelmans, 2020. "The Roadside Healthcare Facility Location Problem A Managerial Network Design Challenge," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1165-1187, May.
    9. Arslan, Okan & Archetti, Claudia & Jabali, Ola & Laporte, Gilbert & Grazia Speranza, Maria, 2020. "Minimum cost network design in strategic alliances," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Quddus, Md Abdul & Shahvari, Omid & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Ekşioğlu, Sandra D. & Castillo-Villar, Krystel K., 2021. "Designing a reliable electric vehicle charging station expansion under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    11. Tran, Cong Quoc & Keyvan-Ekbatani, Mehdi & Ngoduy, Dong & Watling, David, 2021. "Stochasticity and environmental cost inclusion for electric vehicles fast-charging facility deployment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Kınay, Ömer Burak & Gzara, Fatma & Alumur, Sibel A., 2021. "Full cover charging station location problem with routing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-22.
    13. Meysam Hosseini & Arsalan Rahmani & F. Hooshmand, 2022. "A robust model for recharging station location problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 4397-4440, September.
    14. Rostislav Staněk & Peter Greistorfer & Anna Elisabeth Kastner, 2024. "Advanced optimization models for the location of charging stations in e-mobility," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 32(3), pages 737-761, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Vries, H. & Westerink-Duijzer, L.E., 2016. "Incorporating Driving Range Variability in Network Design for Refueling Facilities," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-19, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    2. Arslan, Okan & Karaşan, Oya Ekin, 2016. "A Benders decomposition approach for the charging station location problem with plug-in hybrid electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 670-695.
    3. Taymaz, S. & Iyigun, C. & Bayindir, Z.P. & Dellaert, N.P., 2020. "A healthcare facility location problem for a multi-disease, multi-service environment under risk aversion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Mahmutoğulları, Özlem & Yaman, Hande, 2023. "Robust alternative fuel refueling station location problem with routing under decision-dependent flow uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 173-188.
    5. Joonho Ko & Tae-Hyoung Tommy Gim & Randall Guensler, 2017. "Locating refuelling stations for alternative fuel vehicles: a review on models and applications," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 551-570, September.
    6. Marković, Nikola & Ryzhov, Ilya O. & Schonfeld, Paul, 2017. "Evasive flow capture: A multi-period stochastic facility location problem with independent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 687-703.
    7. Chung, Sung Hoon & Kwon, Changhyun, 2015. "Multi-period planning for electric car charging station locations: A case of Korean Expressways," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 677-687.
    8. Ventura, Jose A. & Kweon, Sang Jin & Hwang, Seong Wook & Tormay, Matthew & Li, Chenxi, 2017. "Energy policy considerations in the design of an alternative-fuel refueling infrastructure to reduce GHG emissions on a transportation network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 427-439.
    9. Yıldız, Barış & Arslan, Okan & Karaşan, Oya Ekin, 2016. "A branch and price approach for routing and refueling station location model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 815-826.
    10. Yıldız, Barış & Olcaytu, Evren & Şen, Ahmet, 2019. "The urban recharging infrastructure design problem with stochastic demands and capacitated charging stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 22-44.
    11. Tran, Trung Hieu & Nagy, Gábor & Nguyen, Thu Ba T. & Wassan, Niaz A., 2018. "An efficient heuristic algorithm for the alternative-fuel station location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 159-170.
    12. Kınay, Ömer Burak & Gzara, Fatma & Alumur, Sibel A., 2021. "Full cover charging station location problem with routing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-22.
    13. Hong, Shuyao & Kuby, Michael, 2016. "A threshold covering flow-based location model to build a critical mass of alternative-fuel stations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 128-137.
    14. Zhang, Anpeng & Kang, Jee Eun & Kwon, Changhyun, 2017. "Incorporating demand dynamics in multi-period capacitated fast-charging location planning for electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 5-29.
    15. Kuby, Michael & Capar, Ismail & Kim, Jong-Geun, 2017. "Efficient and equitable transnational infrastructure planning for natural gas trucking in the European Union," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 979-991.
    16. S. A. MirHassani & R. Ebrazi, 2013. "A Flexible Reformulation of the Refueling Station Location Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 617-628, November.
    17. Monir Sabbaghtorkan & Rajan Batta & Qing He, 2022. "On the analysis of an idealized model to manage gasoline supplies in a short-notice hurricane evacuation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(3), pages 911-945, September.
    18. Hwang, Seong Wook & Kweon, Sang Jin & Ventura, Jose A., 2015. "Infrastructure development for alternative fuel vehicles on a highway road system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 170-183.
    19. Erdoğan, Sevgi & Çapar, İsmail & Çapar, İbrahim & Nejad, Mohammad Motalleb, 2022. "Establishing a statewide electric vehicle charging station network in Maryland: A corridor-based station location problem," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Tanaka, Ken-ichi & Furuta, Takehiro & Toriumi, Shigeki, 2019. "Railway flow interception location model: Model development and case study of Tokyo metropolitan railway network," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:102-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.