IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v25y1997i5p585-594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Progressive engineering changes in multi-level product structures

Author

Listed:
  • Ho, C. -J.
  • Li, J.

Abstract

One of the objectives of engineering changes is to redesign product/component parts to perform better or to be produced more efficiently. Frequent engineering changes, however, contribute to scheduling instability in multi-level product structures in addition to obsolete inventories. In this paper, we consider progressive probabilities of engineering changes as opposed to the constant probabilities generally assumed in most related studies. Realistically, the probability of changing a part at a certain level is affected by the changes in its parent levels. Thus, the likelihood of changes may progressively cascade from the top to the bottom of the product structure. An analytical procedure is developed to compute progressive probabilities of engineering changes. Then, a sensitivity analysis is performed to see how the shape of product structure and component commonality affect resultant progressive engineering changes for the lower-level items in the product structure. We find that engineering changes of a component part are affected significantly by the number of immediate parent items and their magnitudes of engineering changes. However, the depth of product structure has no significant impact on the engineering change of any item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho, C. -J. & Li, J., 1997. "Progressive engineering changes in multi-level product structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 585-594, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:25:y:1997:i:5:p:585-594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(97)00020-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David A. Collier, 1982. "Aggregate Safety Stock Levels and Component Part Commonality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(11), pages 1296-1303, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eva Labro, 2004. "The Cost Effects of Component Commonality: A Literature Review Through a Management-Accounting Lens," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 358-367, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wallace J. Hopp & Xiaowei Xu, 2005. "Product Line Selection and Pricing with Modularity in Design," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 172-187, August.
    2. Hillier, Mark S., 2002. "Using commonality as backup safety stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 353-365, January.
    3. Alfaro, José A. & Corbett, Charles J., 2000. "The value of SKU rationalization: the pooling effect under suboptimal inventory policies," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB 9917, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    4. Jeet, Vishv & Kutanoglu, Erhan, 2018. "Part commonality effects on integrated network design and inventory models for low-demand service parts logistics systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 46-58.
    5. Thyssen, Jesper & Israelsen, Poul & Jørgensen, Brian, 2005. "Activity Based Costing as a method for assessing the economics of modularization - a case study and beyond," Management Accounting Research Group Working Papers M-2005-04, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    6. Mohebbi, E. & Choobineh, F. & Pattanayak, A., 2007. "Capacity-driven vs. demand-driven material procurement systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 451-466, June.
    7. Eva Labro, 2004. "The Cost Effects of Component Commonality: A Literature Review Through a Management-Accounting Lens," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 358-367, June.
    8. Narendra Agrawal & Morris A. Cohen, 2001. "Optimal material control in an assembly system with component commonality," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(5), pages 409-429, August.
    9. Ulrich W. Thonemann & Margaret L. Brandeau, 2000. "Optimal Commonality in Component Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Albert Y. Ha, 1997. "Stock‐rationing policy for a make‐to‐stock production system with two priority classes and backordering," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(5), pages 457-472, August.
    11. Mohebbi, E. & Choobineh, F., 2005. "The impact of component commonality in an assemble-to-order environment under supply and demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 472-482, December.
    12. Gonçalves, João N.C. & Sameiro Carvalho, M. & Cortez, Paulo, 2020. "Operations research models and methods for safety stock determination: A review," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    13. Anand Paul & Asoo J. Vakharia, 2006. "Requirements planning for modular products," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(5), pages 418-431, August.
    14. Droge, Cornelia & Vickery, Shawnee K. & Jacobs, Mark A., 2012. "Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 250-262.
    15. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Ruiz-Hernández, Diego & Guimaraes, Renato, 2016. "The component commonality problem in a real multidimensional space: An algorithmic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 105-116.
    16. Mark S. Hillier, 1999. "Product commonality in multiple‐period, make‐to‐stock systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(6), pages 737-751, September.
    17. Israelsen, Poul & Jørgensen, Brian, 2011. "Decentralizing decision making in modularization strategies: Overcoming barriers from dysfunctional accounting systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 453-462, June.
    18. Kevin Weng, Z., 1999. "Risk-pooling over demand uncertainty in the presence of product modularity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 75-85, May.
    19. Kimms, Alf & Drexl, Andreas, 1996. "Multi-level lot sizing: A literature survey," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 405, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    20. Thyssen, Jesper & Israelsen, Poul & Jorgensen, Brian, 2006. "Activity-based costing as a method for assessing the economics of modularization--A case study and beyond," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 252-270, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:25:y:1997:i:5:p:585-594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.