IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v23y1995i4p391-401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Graph theoretic heuristics for unequal-sized facility layout problems

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, J. -Y.
  • Kim, Y. -D.

Abstract

We consider the unequal-sized facility layout problem with the objective of minimizing total transportation distance. The total transportation distance is defined as the sum of products of flow amounts and rectilinear distances between facilities, where flow amount represents the number of trips per time period between facilities. In the layout problem, it is assumed that shapes of facilities are not fixed and that there is no empty space between facilities in the layout. We propose new graph theoretic heuristics for the problem. In the heuristics, an initial layout is obtained by constructing a planar adjacency graph and then the solution is improved by changing the adjacency graph (not the physical layout). Therefore, these heuristics do not need an initial layout in advance, and sizes and locations of facilities do not have to be considered in the improvement procedure. Computational results showed that the proposed algorithms gave better solutions than those from CRAFT, which is one of the most popular algorithms for unequal-sized facility layout problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, J. -Y. & Kim, Y. -D., 1995. "Graph theoretic heuristics for unequal-sized facility layout problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 391-401, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:23:y:1995:i:4:p:391-401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(95)00016-H
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jouko Seppänen & James M. Moore, 1970. "Facilities Planning with Graph Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 242-253, December.
    2. Harry K. Edwards & Billy E. Gillett & Monta E. Hale, 1970. "Modular Allocation Technique (MAT)," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 161-169, November.
    3. Heragu, Sunderesh S. & Kusiak, Andrew, 1991. "Efficient models for the facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Michael Scriabin & Roger C. Vergin, 1985. "A Cluster-Analytic Approach to Facility Layout," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 33-49, January.
    5. Kusiak, Andrew & Heragu, Sunderesh S., 1987. "The facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 229-251, June.
    6. Frederick S. Hillier & Michael M. Connors, 1966. "Quadratic Assignment Problem Algorithms and the Location of Indivisible Facilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 42-57, September.
    7. Kaufman, L. & Broeckx, F., 1978. "An algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem using Bender's decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 207-211, May.
    8. Janny Leung, 1992. "A New Graph-Theoretic Heuristic for Facility Layout," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 594-605, April.
    9. Green, Rh & Al-Hakim, Lar, 1985. "A heuristic for facilities layout planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 469-474.
    10. Sunderesh S. Heragu & Andrew Kusiak, 1988. "Machine Layout Problem in Flexible Manufacturing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 258-268, April.
    11. Christopher E. Nugent & Thomas E. Vollmann & John Ruml, 1968. "An Experimental Comparison of Techniques for the Assignment of Facilities to Locations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 150-173, February.
    12. Zvi Drezner, 1980. "DISCON: A New Method for the Layout Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1375-1384, December.
    13. Christopher J. Picone & Wilbert E. Wilhelm, 1984. "A Perturbation Scheme to Improve Hillier's Solution to the Facilities Layout Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(10), pages 1238-1249, October.
    14. Eugene L. Lawler, 1963. "The Quadratic Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 586-599, July.
    15. Heragu, Sunderesh S., 1992. "Recent models and techniques for solving the layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 136-144, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Geun-Cheol & Kim, Yeong-Dae, 2000. "Algorithms for adjusting shapes of departments in block layouts on the grid-based plane," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 111-122, February.
    2. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2016. "Experimental examination of facilities layout problems in logistics systems including objects with diverse sizes and shapes," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/16/12, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    3. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2016. "A concept of a flexible approach to the facilities layout problems in logistics systems," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/16/11, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ravi Kumar, K. & Hadjinicola, George C. & Lin, Ting-li, 1995. "A heuristic procedure for the single-row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 65-73, November.
    2. Kazuhiro Tsuchiya & Sunil Bharitkar & Yoshiyasu Takefuji, 1996. "A neural network approach to facility layout problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 556-563, March.
    3. Li, Wu-Ji & Smith, J. MacGregor, 1995. "An algorithm for Quadratic Assignment Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 205-216, February.
    4. Zhongwei Zhang & Lihui Wu & Zhaoyun Wu & Wenqiang Zhang & Shun Jia & Tao Peng, 2022. "Energy-Saving Oriented Manufacturing Workshop Facility Layout: A Solution Approach Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafał Michalski, 2020. "Effects of scatter plot initial solutions on regular grid facility layout algorithms in typical production models," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 601-632, June.
    6. Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Chiang, Chi, 1998. "Intelligent local search strategies for solving facility layout problems with the quadratic assignment problem formulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 457-488, April.
    7. A Diponegoro & B R Sarker, 2003. "Machine assignment in a nonlinear multi-product flowline," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(5), pages 472-489, May.
    8. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2016. "A concept of a flexible approach to the facilities layout problems in logistics systems," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/16/11, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    9. Ignacio Castillo & Thaddeus Sim, 2004. "A spring-embedding approach for the facility layout problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(1), pages 73-81, January.
    10. Loiola, Eliane Maria & de Abreu, Nair Maria Maia & Boaventura-Netto, Paulo Oswaldo & Hahn, Peter & Querido, Tania, 2007. "A survey for the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 657-690, January.
    11. Bolte, Andreas & Thonemann, Ulrich Wilhelm, 1996. "Optimizing simulated annealing schedules with genetic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 402-416, July.
    12. Bazargan-Lari, Massoud, 1999. "Layout designs in cellular manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 258-272, January.
    13. Richárd Molnár-Szipai & Anita Varga, 2019. "Integrating combinatorial algorithms into a linear programming solver," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(2), pages 475-482, June.
    14. André R. S. Amaral, 2008. "An Exact Approach to the One-Dimensional Facility Layout Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 1026-1033, August.
    15. Stefan Helber & Daniel Böhme & Farid Oucherif & Svenja Lagershausen & Steffen Kasper, 2016. "A hierarchical facility layout planning approach for large and complex hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-29, June.
    16. Junqi Liu & Zeqiang Zhang & Feng Chen & Silu Liu & Lixia Zhu, 2022. "A novel hybrid immune clonal selection algorithm for the constrained corridor allocation problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 953-972, April.
    17. Paul D. Dowling & R. F. Love, 1990. "Floor layouts using a multifacility location model," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 945-952, December.
    18. Keller, Birgit & Buscher, Udo, 2015. "Single row layout models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 629-644.
    19. Miguel F. Anjos & Anthony Vannelli, 2008. "Computing Globally Optimal Solutions for Single-Row Layout Problems Using Semidefinite Programming and Cutting Planes," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 611-617, November.
    20. Ball, Michael O. & Kaku, Bharat K. & Vakhutinsky, Andrew, 1998. "Network-based formulations of the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 241-249, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:23:y:1995:i:4:p:391-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.