IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v117y2023ics0305048322002286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electricity Tariff Design via Lens of Energy Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Hafiz Anwar Ullah
  • Ünel, Burçin
  • Dvorkin, Yury

Abstract

Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) can significantly affect the net social benefit in power systems, raising concerns pertaining to distributive justice and equity. Electricity tariff and DERs share a symbiotic relationship whereby the design of the former directly impacts the economic efficiency and equity in the system. Current tariff design approaches suffer from opaque efficiency-equity trade-offs and are also agnostic of the externalities that affect both economic efficiency and equity. Therefore, this paper develops a justice-cognizant tariff design framework that improves the operational savings in the system without sacrificing distributional equity, and encompasses economic welfare, social costs of environmental and public health impacts, and socio-economic and demographic characteristics of electricity consumers. The proposed framework is based on a Single Leader Single Follower (SLSF) game incorporating a multi-objective optimization problem, and is evaluated on four different tariff structures. The SLSF game is reformulated as a Multi-Objective Problem with Equilibrium Constraints (MOPEC) and is solved by integrating the objective sum method for multi-objective optimization and Scholtes’s relaxation technique for equilibrium constraints. We compare the operational savings and equity of the proposed framework using the 11-zone New York ISO and 7-bus Manhattan power networks. The results demonstrate that justice-cognizant, and spatially- and temporally-granular tariffs ensure equity and increase the operational savings at a lower energy burden to consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Hafiz Anwar Ullah & Ünel, Burçin & Dvorkin, Yury, 2023. "Electricity Tariff Design via Lens of Energy Justice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:117:y:2023:i:c:s0305048322002286
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2022.102822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048322002286
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bridge, Brandon A. & Adhikari, Dadhi & Fontenla, Matías, 2016. "Household-level effects of electricity on income," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 222-228.
    2. Sun, Chuanwang & Ouyang, Xiaoling, 2016. "Price and expenditure elasticities of residential energy demand during urbanization: An empirical analysis based on the household-level survey data in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 56-63.
    3. Rodgers, Mark D. & Coit, David W. & Felder, Frank A. & Carlton, Annmarie, 2018. "Generation expansion planning considering health and societal damages – A simulation-based optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 951-963.
    4. Savelli, Iacopo & Morstyn, Thomas, 2021. "Electricity prices and tariffs to keep everyone happy: A framework for fixed and nodal prices coexistence in distribution grids with optimal tariffs for investment cost recovery," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Mukherjee, Ishani, 2011. "Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5343-5355.
    6. Ansarin, Mohammad & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Ketter, Wolfgang & Collins, John, 2020. "The economic consequences of electricity tariff design in a renewable energy era," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Dworkin, Michael H., 2015. "Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 435-444.
    8. Hoarau, Quentin & Perez, Yannick, 2019. "Network tariff design with prosumers and electromobility: Who wins, who loses?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 26-39.
    9. Liang Liu & Taesung Hwang & Sungwon Lee & Yanfeng Ouyang & Bumsoo Lee & Steven J. Smith & Christopher W. Tessum & Julian D. Marshall & Fang Yan & Kathryn Daenzer & Tami C. Bond, 2019. "Health and climate impacts of future United States land freight modelled with global-to-urban models," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(2), pages 105-112, February.
    10. Rodgers, Mark & Coit, David & Felder, Frank & Carlton, Annmarie, 2019. "Assessing the effects of power grid expansion on human health externalities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 92-104.
    11. Nguyen, Hieu T. & Felder, Frank A., 2020. "Generation expansion planning with renewable energy credit markets: A bilevel programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    12. Tim Schittekatte and Leonardo Meeus, 2020. "Least-cost Distribution Network Tariff Design in Theory and Practice," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 5), pages 119-156.
    13. Heleno, Miguel & Sigrin, Benjamin & Popovich, Natalie & Heeter, Jenny & Jain Figueroa, Anjuli & Reiner, Michael & Reames, Tony, 2022. "Optimizing equity in energy policy interventions: A quantitative decision-support framework for energy justice," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    14. Benjamin K. Sovacool & Raphael J. Heffron & Darren McCauley & Andreas Goldthau, 2016. "Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 1-6, May.
    15. Anna M. Brockway & Jennifer Conde & Duncan Callaway, 2021. "Inequitable access to distributed energy resources due to grid infrastructure limits in California," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 892-903, September.
    16. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Burke, Matthew & Baker, Lucy & Kotikalapudi, Chaitanya Kumar & Wlokas, Holle, 2017. "New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 677-691.
    17. Valentin Robu & Meritxell Vinyals & Alex Rogers & Nicholas B. Jennings, 2018. "Efficient Buyer Groups With Prediction-of-Use Electricity Tariffs," Post-Print cea-01917811, HAL.
    18. Robert L. Fares & Michael E. Webber, 2017. "The impacts of storing solar energy in the home to reduce reliance on the utility," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(2), pages 1-10, February.
    19. Alice Tianbo Zhang & Sasmita Patnaik & Shaily Jha & Shalu Agrawal & Carlos F. Gould & Johannes Urpelainen, 2022. "Evidence of multidimensional gender inequality in energy services from a large-scale household survey in India," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 698-707, August.
    20. Batlle, Carlos & Mastropietro, Paolo & Rodilla, Pablo, 2020. "Redesigning residual cost allocation in electricity tariffs: A proposal to balance efficiency, equity and cost recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 257-266.
    21. Iacopo Savelli & Thomas Morstyn, 2020. "Electricity prices and tariffs to keep everyone happy: a framework for fixed and nodal prices coexistence in distribution grids with optimal tariffs for investment cost recovery," Papers 2001.04283, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    22. Schittekatte, Tim & Momber, Ilan & Meeus, Leonardo, 2018. "Future-proof tariff design: Recovering sunk grid costs in a world where consumers are pushing back," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 484-498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liudong Chen & Bolun Xu, 2024. "Prudent Price-Responsive Demands," Papers 2405.16356, arXiv.org.
    2. Chargui, Kaoutar & Zouadi, Tarik & Sreedharan, V. Raja & El Fallahi, Abdellah & Reghioui, Mohamed, 2023. "A novel robust exact decomposition algorithm for berth and quay crane allocation and scheduling problem considering uncertainty and energy efficiency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaughan, Jim & Doumen, Sjoerd C. & Kok, Koen, 2023. "Empowering tomorrow, controlling today: A multi-criteria assessment of distribution grid tariff designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    2. Lyu, Yuan & He, Yongxiu & Li, Shanzi & Zhou, Jinghan & Tian, BingYing, 2024. "Channeling approach of prosumer connection costs considering regional differences in China — Evolutionary game among distributed photovoltaic entities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    3. Morell-Dameto, Nicolás & Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo & Gómez San Román, Tomás & Schittekatte, Tim, 2023. "Forward-looking dynamic network charges for real-world electricity systems: A Slovenian case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Hendam, Mohamed & Schittekatte, Tim & Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed & Kamh, Mohamed Zakaria, 2022. "Rethinking electricity rate design: Fostering the energy transition in North Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Jeddi, Samir & Sitzmann, Amelie, 2021. "Network tariffs under different pricing schemes in a dynamically consistent framework," EWI Working Papers 2021-1, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    6. Gafa, Dede W. & Egbendewe, Aklesso Y.G. & Jodoin, Laurent, 2022. "Operationalizing affordability criterion in energy justice: Evidence from rural West Africa," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Lyu, Yuan & He, Yongxiu & Zhou, Jinghan & Xie, Yuxin, 2023. "Prosumer standby fee design: Solving the inequity problem of China's county-wide photovoltaic project promotion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 309-320.
    8. Lee, Heerae & Shon, Huijoo, 2024. "Spatial and temporal patterns of energy aid and poverty in four African countries: Focusing on distributive and recognition justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Feenstra, Mariëlle & Özerol, Gül, 2021. "Energy justice as a search light for gender-energy nexus: Towards a conceptual framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Merel Noorman & Brenda Espinosa Apráez & Saskia Lavrijssen, 2023. "AI and Energy Justice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Hennig, Roman J. & Ribó-Pérez, David & de Vries, Laurens J. & Tindemans, Simon H., 2022. "What is a good distribution network tariff?—Developing indicators for performance assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    12. Freitas Gomes, Icaro Silvestre & Perez, Yannick & Suomalainen, Emilia, 2021. "Rate design with distributed energy resources and electric vehicles: A Californian case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Malinauskaite, J. & Jouhara, H., 2019. "The trilemma of waste-to-energy: A multi-purpose solution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 636-645.
    14. Bartiaux, Françoise & Vandeschrick, Christophe & Moezzi, Mithra & Frogneux, Nathalie, 2018. "Energy justice, unequal access to affordable warmth, and capability deprivation: A quantitative analysis for Belgium," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1219-1233.
    15. Jayapalan, C. & Ganesh, L.S., 2019. "Environmentalists and their conflicts with Energy Justice – Concept of “Power-Environ” in the Athirappilly HEPP in Kerala," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 215-229.
    16. Healy, Noel & Barry, John, 2017. "Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 451-459.
    17. Hiteva, Ralitsa & Sovacool, Benjamin, 2017. "Harnessing social innovation for energy justice: A business model perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 631-639.
    18. Alford-Jones, Kelsey, 2022. "How injustice can lead to energy policy failure: A case study from Guatemala," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    19. Zaman, Rafia & Brudermann, Thomas, 2018. "Energy governance in the context of energy service security: A qualitative assessment of the electricity system in Bangladesh," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 443-456.
    20. Park, Seona & Yun, Sun-Jin & Cho, Kongjang, 2024. "Energy justice: Lessons from offshore wind farm siting conflicts in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:117:y:2023:i:c:s0305048322002286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.